I mean it’s pretty obvious that women would have most of the blame there if you want to go the “everything is a social construct” route. In burger land people see their fathers for a fraction of the time they spend with mothers, plus the majority of teachers being women. Foids created these moids.
I wonder if they're even capable of entertaining the idea that it may not be possible to dismantle the patriarchy as they see it. That some things may not be a societal construct.
Like especially with epigenetics, you can change a lot in just a few generations. If women want to make men into those deep sea fish where the female absorbs the male and it becomes nothing but a sperm sack, they should start by selecting the most small, spineless.
It basically means that the language we use surrounding what we call patriarchy might not be the most productive.
On the threshold of an absolutely galaxy brained breakthrough here. Possibly the breakthrough of the new century. Could the incredibly demeaning and hostile way this is presented be a problem?
Also a smugpost halfway down about how smart the subreddit is by commenting on methodology. Most of those comments make it very clear that the person did not even read the abstract of the study.
10 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-03-04
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
3 TaysSecondGussy 2020-03-04
I mean it’s pretty obvious that women would have most of the blame there if you want to go the “everything is a social construct” route. In burger land people see their fathers for a fraction of the time they spend with mothers, plus the majority of teachers being women. Foids created these moids.
3 trexmundi 2020-03-04
I wonder if they're even capable of entertaining the idea that it may not be possible to dismantle the patriarchy as they see it. That some things may not be a societal construct.
2 Orbidorpdorp 2020-03-04
I don’t get why they don’t try to actually tweak.
Like especially with epigenetics, you can change a lot in just a few generations. If women want to make men into those deep sea fish where the female absorbs the male and it becomes nothing but a sperm sack, they should start by selecting the most small, spineless.
2 SnapshillBot 2020-03-04
Congratulations! I do not often downvote. You have earned mine.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
2 trexmundi 2020-03-04
On the threshold of an absolutely galaxy brained breakthrough here. Possibly the breakthrough of the new century. Could the incredibly demeaning and hostile way this is presented be a problem?
Also a smugpost halfway down about how smart the subreddit is by commenting on methodology. Most of those comments make it very clear that the person did not even read the abstract of the study.
1 Ultrashitposter 2020-03-04
Surprised that thread isnt locked yet
1 [deleted] 2020-03-04
[removed]
1 Alicesnakebae 2020-03-04
This really gonna fuck them in the head
"Women bad" how will they cope