This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
I like the part when they make fun of the guy with 'Kant' flair and then end up with a douchebag debate about Kant as if.
Imagine saying about probably the most insightful philosopher of our time
Also yeah, Heidegger sucks and his politics are mostly just a mix of fun and meaningless poetry, veiled nazi propaganda, and an unwillingness to comprehend his own involvement.
Philosophers are all dumb fart-sniffing bitches oh hmm we live in a society how insightful and have you ever considered that there's no such thing as good and evil and that people will justify their actions to themselves hmmm
Especially considering they're so r-slur'd that they don't even realize that NL is more focused on Kant's political philosophy, i.e. the world should be nothing but capitalist constitutional republics because that incentivizes peace, trade, freedom, and rule of law.
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
It's fairly obvious to anyone with a high school education that no one in that thread has even read a single word of Kant beyond the categorical imperative, and exactly none of them has read Heidegger obviously. Literally the only reason why they namedrop Heidegger is so they can repost lame cold takes they heard from Contrapoints while masturbating to her sh*tty videos. Wow, a famous and influential philosopher was also a g*mer, how shocking! Bet you'll take a better look on all your heroes now since people who spend their free time commenting on S*D instead of partaking in society in an even remotely useful way like everyone else are obviously a million times more better people than any of these philosophers.
Sure, both Kant and Heidegger were German philosophers, and yes, both wrote about topics that are widely considered to be part of however philosophers define the field of "Ontology" within philosophy, but other than that there's pretty much zero overlap between these two people and there's no reason anyone would mix them up, since Kant today is pretty much only known for being that famous moral philosopher with the hilarious surname who came up with the categorical imperative.
Heidegger on the other hand, is mostly just known as an old N*zi who had a co*k big enough to make Hannah Ar*ndt squ*rt when they were having s*x, which is something she never could get over with, which is the reason why she wasted the rest of her life r*ging against le evil N*zis and c*ping with her failure to keep the man who could fill her smelly g*ssy up like no one else ever could.
Aside from bringing up Heidegger being the cheapest and laziest way to gain karma in that trashcan of a subreddit, it's also utterly unnecessary, even from the average S*Dine's point of view, since there's already plenty of material from Kant to criticize from a leftist, anti-imperialist, and certainly from an anti-r*cist perspective. There are literally thousands of pages of shitty papers from philosophy undergrads about Kant's implicit or explicit endorsements of coloni*lism, imp*rialism, and r*cism, and most of them aren't even mentioning the fact that he was basically 18th century's biggest i*c*l.
But it's not like anyone in that thread has read anything beyond the categorical imperative, so whatever ret*rd*tion that happens in the comments over there is not suprising in the least.
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
You have 4 links and not one of them is to information. The signal to noise ratio of the shit I've read from your links is absolutely abysmal, nobody with a working brain would put time into reading such drivel, let alone attempt to use it in place of information sources. If basic income actually failed, you could give at least some semblance of a concise explanation of the failure, or at least have one of your four links lead to something data-focused, instead of being like "here's an opinion, now immerse yourself in verbose repititions of that opinion for a half hour since hopefully that's enough to make you agree with it." You are a prime brainwashee and the reason Trump will win again.
So... if Ford was a democrat that would've been be a strike against her? Seriously?
Yuuuuup, you hit the nail on the nail there. I'm taking a very realpolitik line here
More like the brainlet line. I only support the candidate that can dole out the most drama, so I won't have to feel morally responsible for the asshole I help elected.
43 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-29
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
9 Comprehensive_Ocelot 2020-04-29
I'm just amazed at the mental gymnastics to say Reade isn't credible, but Ford was. I mean dude r@pe lmao
6 hyphenjack 2020-04-29
Especially because a couple of people have corroborated Reade's story, while everyone around Ford turned out to be obviously lying
Neither story has any hard evidence and never will, but one of them has a teeny tiny edge
4 Doesnt_Draw_Anything 2020-04-29
Yeah the only thing to conclude is that they're both lying
1 betterdeadthenfed 2020-04-29
This but unironically
6 jaredschaffer27 2020-04-29
No women are credible
1 [deleted] 2020-04-29
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-29
Hi languidhorse!
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
Goodbye.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
7 Neon_needles 2020-04-29
Let me break down this whole thread.
SRD: believe all women... except this one. And any others I guess who accuse blue.
Normies: isn't that hypocritical?
SRD: please stop trolling me, Russian bot.
2 diggity_md 2020-04-29
Also: It was Liz's turn
6 i_Chapo-d_my_pants 2020-04-29
uh
6 hyphenjack 2020-04-29
Well they are correct. The true purpose of SRD is to jack off your ego and get mad at T3RFs and what have you
5 strumyabird 2020-04-29
The ultra c*pe is glorious.
N-n-no we're champions of justice and defenders of the weak ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
3 Lord_Sticky 2020-04-29
R/selfawarewolves amirite?
1 [deleted] 2020-04-29
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-29
Hi strumyabird!
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
Goodbye.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
5 newcomer_ts 2020-04-29
I like the part when they make fun of the guy with 'Kant' flair and then end up with a douchebag debate about Kant as if.
Imagine saying about probably the most insightful philosopher of our time
You can spot a Marxist parrot from a mile.
5 mcbrd 2020-04-29
Philosophers are all dumb fart-sniffing bitches oh hmm we live in a society how insightful and have you ever considered that there's no such thing as good and evil and that people will justify their actions to themselves hmmm
1 St0neA 2020-04-29
hmmmm
4 diggity_md 2020-04-29
Heidegger is a bunch of unintelligible horseshit though, no lie
2 gilmore606 2020-04-29
wrong. Hegel is that, though. fight me.
3 THOT-AUDITOR 2020-04-29
My metric for how much a philosopher pushes unintelligible horseshit is how often Slavoj Zizek references them in his works.
So Hegel only baaaarely edges past Kant in terms of opaqueness.
2 gilmore606 2020-04-29
I like this because it's the philosophical equivalent of inverting /r/wallstreetbets .
1 TheLordHighExecu 2020-04-29
Why, are you going to get your spooky world ghost to punch me
2 Fletch71011 2020-04-29
I cannot imagine anything more worthless than a philosopher.
1 Commy_Mommy_Rises 2020-04-29
Especially considering they're so r-slur'd that they don't even realize that NL is more focused on Kant's political philosophy, i.e. the world should be nothing but capitalist constitutional republics because that incentivizes peace, trade, freedom, and rule of law.
Which is unironically based and Kant-pilled.
1 [deleted] 2020-04-29
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-29
Hi ZumWegwerfenBitte!
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
Goodbye.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 ZumWegwerfenBitte 2020-04-29
It's fairly obvious to anyone with a high school education that no one in that thread has even read a single word of Kant beyond the categorical imperative, and exactly none of them has read Heidegger obviously. Literally the only reason why they namedrop Heidegger is so they can repost lame cold takes they heard from Contrapoints while masturbating to her sh*tty videos. Wow, a famous and influential philosopher was also a g*mer, how shocking! Bet you'll take a better look on all your heroes now since people who spend their free time commenting on S*D instead of partaking in society in an even remotely useful way like everyone else are obviously a million times more better people than any of these philosophers.
Sure, both Kant and Heidegger were German philosophers, and yes, both wrote about topics that are widely considered to be part of however philosophers define the field of "Ontology" within philosophy, but other than that there's pretty much zero overlap between these two people and there's no reason anyone would mix them up, since Kant today is pretty much only known for being that famous moral philosopher with the hilarious surname who came up with the categorical imperative.
Heidegger on the other hand, is mostly just known as an old N*zi who had a co*k big enough to make Hannah Ar*ndt squ*rt when they were having s*x, which is something she never could get over with, which is the reason why she wasted the rest of her life r*ging against le evil N*zis and c*ping with her failure to keep the man who could fill her smelly g*ssy up like no one else ever could.
Aside from bringing up Heidegger being the cheapest and laziest way to gain karma in that trashcan of a subreddit, it's also utterly unnecessary, even from the average S*Dine's point of view, since there's already plenty of material from Kant to criticize from a leftist, anti-imperialist, and certainly from an anti-r*cist perspective. There are literally thousands of pages of shitty papers from philosophy undergrads about Kant's implicit or explicit endorsements of coloni*lism, imp*rialism, and r*cism, and most of them aren't even mentioning the fact that he was basically 18th century's biggest i*c*l.
But it's not like anyone in that thread has read anything beyond the categorical imperative, so whatever ret*rd*tion that happens in the comments over there is not suprising in the least.
1 [deleted] 2020-04-29
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-29
Hi ANonUSs!
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
Goodbye.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
3 HodorLePortePorte 2020-04-29
It's a nonargument because Biden didn't rape anyone. His fetish is sniffing.
3 Yeetsauce100 2020-04-29
Reade just doesn't think it would be believable to tell people that biden forcibly inserted his nose into her pussy
3 thoroughlythrown 2020-04-29
imagine the smell 🤤
2 Neon_needles 2020-04-29
Honestly, biden is a victim of possible fart rape and should be considered a hero.
1 Bummunism 2020-04-29
🤔
3 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2020-04-29
1 SnapshillBot 2020-04-29
You have 4 links and not one of them is to information. The signal to noise ratio of the shit I've read from your links is absolutely abysmal, nobody with a working brain would put time into reading such drivel, let alone attempt to use it in place of information sources. If basic income actually failed, you could give at least some semblance of a concise explanation of the failure, or at least have one of your four links lead to something data-focused, instead of being like "here's an opinion, now immerse yourself in verbose repititions of that opinion for a half hour since hopefully that's enough to make you agree with it." You are a prime brainwashee and the reason Trump will win again.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 Standard12 2020-04-29
https://www.reddit.com/r/subredditdrama/comments/ga6koh/_/foy5sej
Russian agents.
https://www.reddit.com/r/subredditdrama/comments/ga6koh/_/foy28w4
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2020-04-29
Good newsThat asteroid didn't wipe us all out yesterday.1 Pepperglue 2020-04-29
More like the brainlet line. I only support the candidate that can dole out the most drama, so I won't have to feel morally responsible for the asshole I help elected.
3 -saren- 2020-04-29
Except she was a democrat. Day of the can WHEN