Mommy DeVos improves Title IX by requiring accusers to be cross-examines by the accused, and folks who hate due process are *mad* - search ‘DeVos’ for more!

1  2020-05-06 by ShemaleSlammer

48 comments

We are reading the 2,000+ page rule so you don’t have to

Big red flag.

Less time reading WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS and more time playing le ebic switcherino!!!!!! :DDDD

The review must go on

Apparently all the commenters are interpreting the law so we do have to as well. There a bunch of people saying that cross examination of your accuser under the 6th amendment only applies to courts. They are very wrong. Due process requirements extend to a lot of government action(for example, firing a teacher or other state employee , etc.). Devos has expanded the requirements for title IX claims.

It is ridiculous. We are supposed to be protecting victims. All cross-examinations do is give abusers another chance to abuse.

I can imagine it now:

​

"HA-HA REMEMBER THAT TIME I RAPED YOU???? HAHAHAHA"

​

Those poor women.

Rape is a myth

I’m sorry you disagree with due process, that must be tough for you.

Fair is fair.

He's just looking out for people like me

How could a king like yourself get raped?

Especially by r-tards?

r-tards cant consent

It's cool baby -- my uncle is a lawyer

JFG please

I was referring to his reference to abusers 😉

We should give accusers a chance to rape the accused

Based

Yes, it is very sad that now the accused will have the opportunity to waste their one chance at redeeming themselves and saving their professional lives to admit they in fact did sexually assault the accuser, and rub it in their face in front of the panel charged with expelling them.

Ok, talk me through it here buddy. How does this interaction go in your head? What kind of abuse can happen in front of a jury?

There are no juries. This is about college kicking out rapists

falling for bait from RecallRethuglicans

🙄

So you've outed yourself as a freedom hating commie, got it

Yes I understand that. Thanks for clarifying and arguing semantics here - there are clearly a panel to witness the cross-examination, it's not just the abuser and the abused alone in a room.

Explain how, in front of this panel, the abuser would abuse her victim again? Please, I'm interested in the logistics of this.

Hoes mad

If you didn't hate em yesterday, you're gonna hate em tomorrow morning.

literally the only good thing that snake, devos, has done.

My god I just checked your post history. There is no shaming you. This is literally your life. Just imagine how much you could accomplish if you weren’t addicted to Reddit. You’re making a difference, though!

Snapshots:

  1. Mommy DeVos improves Title IX by re... - archive.org, archive.today

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

[removed]

Hi Seattle_Bussy_Lmao!

This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.

The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.

Goodbye.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

Hi gurthanix!

This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.

The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.

Goodbye.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

"""survivors"""

[removed]

Hi ProEvilOperations!

This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.

The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.

Goodbye.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Up near the top of the thread:

Believe all wome n! wome n never lie about r@pe

Further down someone mentions how Bide n and Trum p are r@pists

Tar a Read e falsely accused Bide n of r@pe that's what the evidence points to!

🤔

She accused him of sexual assault. Women lie about that but not about rape.

Oh yeah, apparently she should be sexually abused!

These people are whack.

Tbh that account might be a bot, but it’s ridiculous nonetheless

Kennan, you dirty dog😧

It's terrible. Apparently she's never been sexually abused. Apparently she should be, if only to open her eyes to this horrific act.

This is so rslurred. “Take r4pe “””survivors””” seriously! But also get r4ped if you haven’t yet so you know how bad it is to be r4ped!”

I remember some redditors doing some mental gymnastics a couple of years ago when some QB that was expelled from a Montana school (I think) sued the school and it came out the accuser was texting her girlfriend about hooking up with him and the friend goes "well if he won't get together with you again just say he raped you". School still expelled him for it and redditors tried to explain about how we had to believe accusers.

it came out the accuser was texting her girlfriend about hooking up with him and the friend goes “well if he won’t get together with you again just say he raped you”.

How is that relevant?

This is why you only ever hook up with sl*ts

Backdoors hide scores anal babies arent real in lalaland ronanaids is like buttfood