Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
Words like “self-confidence”, “self-reliance”, “initiative”, “enterprise”, “optimism”, etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is antiindividualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve every one’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagohistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
Rawls is a brainlet, and I can't believe his theory of uplifting the lowest common denominator jogger at the expense of everyone else gets any more credence than a five-year-old's theory of printing more money and giving it to poor people to solve poverty.
Dipshit kid needs to move his ladder a few feet to the left and he's fine. Instead they've got fucking construction equipment involved warping the tree. Stupid fucking kids.
The 9/11 Vore Conspiracy argues that the twin towers were not hit by planes externally. Instead, planes were built inside the towers, and continually inflated which eventually caused a collapse.
The anonymous theorist, reviewing footage of the 9/11 attack, stops the footage numerous times to point out "weak zones" of the town that gave in as a response to the increasing weight of the internal aircraft.
He highlights areas in the footage that portray people and objects being violently thrown out of the windows with force, as well as small billows of steam and fire, happening at the lower floor levels of one of the towers.
"Look at this shit. You're telling me there's just random ass explosions going on? Down here? We ain't even remotely close to where the plane collided. Bull fucking horse shit.'
The theorist explains that the planes were built by "crazed U.S. government scientists who watched too much Doctor Who, it was like that of a real life TARDIS experiment".
"They built these massive towers, for what? Business? Hell nah, have you seen the economy pre-9/11? It was shit. We didn't have the money nor energy for no goddamn tower of that size, and definitely not two."
We asked why the experiment would take place in the middle of a city as crowded as NYC. The theorist responded:
"It's hidden in plain sight. NYC's got all the resources in the world, right at your disposal. Nah, seriously man, look at these streets, there's a fuckin' garbage pile up just down the road. You know what kind of technology you can find in these piles? There's some fuckin' money to be made. Plus you get to make a nationwide scare if your experiment fucks up, and publicity means more money. They had all to gain and nothing to lose."
The theorist explains that any and all footage taken inside the Twin Towers pre-9/11 was simply simulated, props, or illusion. Footage of NYC recorded in a position respective to which the twin towers overlooked, was created via a clever series of mirrors originally sourcing from the "432 Park Avenue" building.
The theorist claims that any and all footage of the planes are "so fake, it's laughable", he states: "Nobody saw any planes... not in real life. Outside of what the TV stations would tell you, not a single soul saw an actual, physical plane hit the buildings. Hell, you could ask everyone in New York today, you won't find a single person who saw a plane."
Maybe -hear me out- we shouldn't base our political worldviews off of cartoons. Or try to explain complex concepts with cartoons. Is that really so much to ask?
37 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-05-25
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
9 Sprpr 2020-05-25
Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
Words like “self-confidence”, “self-reliance”, “initiative”, “enterprise”, “optimism”, etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is antiindividualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve every one’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagohistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
8 -x4- 2020-05-25
We don't deserve uncle Ted.
4 Usernameof2015 2020-05-25
Rightoids have low IQs - pizzashill
2 oss_spy 2020-05-25
I loved this when I first saw it
2 Babinx 2020-05-25
I heard leftists are the way they are because they're f*ggy little lobster cücks or something but I like your idea too
1 [deleted] 2020-05-25
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2020-05-25
Hi Babinx!
This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.
The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.
Goodbye.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Colbert_ 2020-05-25
Canned myself when I looked where this is from.
1 closedshop 2020-05-25
WORDS WORDS WORDS
1 -x4- 2020-05-25
lefties r сuсks
1 toynbeeidea16 2020-05-25
o i c
1 yocrappacrappa 2020-05-25
Amen
8 kevindurantalt 2020-05-25
Maybe instead of stealing apples from the tree, those kids should get a job
6 tenebrous_cloud 2020-05-25
Just go stand where the apples are falling lmao fucking idiots
1 [deleted] 2020-05-25
[removed]
1 RecallRethuglicans 2020-05-25
What if the kid was blind? Now the scaffolding is a serious hazard
5 Ultrashitposter 2020-05-25
Rawls was a mistake
1 Laca_Shoulda_Started 2020-05-25
Rawls is a brainlet, and I can't believe his theory of uplifting the lowest common denominator jogger at the expense of everyone else gets any more credence than a five-year-old's theory of printing more money and giving it to poor people to solve poverty.
4 Kat_B0T 2020-05-25
Am I a bad person if I hate both Of the sides duking it out 🤔
5 ThinkingOnce 2020-05-25
Hating drama on r/drama.
1 Kat_B0T 2020-05-25
yes
3 heretobefriends 2020-05-25
No, but it does make you very intelligent, Mortimer.
4 OceanGeese 2020-05-25
The best part about these images is that both sides have the obvious handed to them but still get it horribly wrong.
2 hungarianmeatslammer 2020-05-25
Work together and shake the tree r*tards.
1 OceanGeese 2020-05-25
Sell the tree, buy a casino.
1 -Kite-Man- 2020-05-25
you used the words 'both sides' your argument is invalid
4 YourLocalMonarchist 2020-05-25
equality is just a crutch for the weak
4 Crook_and_Crank 2020-05-25
Dipshit kid needs to move his ladder a few feet to the left and he's fine. Instead they've got fucking construction equipment involved warping the tree. Stupid fucking kids.
3 ARMPIT_ENTHUSIAST 2020-05-25
At least it's not the baseball stadium fence one
2 aqouta 2020-05-25
The only thing worse than the people who take obvious propaganda seriously are the people who pretend to not see the obvious propaganda as it is.
1 SnapshillBot 2020-05-25
The 9/11 Vore Conspiracy argues that the twin towers were not hit by planes externally. Instead, planes were built inside the towers, and continually inflated which eventually caused a collapse.
The anonymous theorist, reviewing footage of the 9/11 attack, stops the footage numerous times to point out "weak zones" of the town that gave in as a response to the increasing weight of the internal aircraft.
He highlights areas in the footage that portray people and objects being violently thrown out of the windows with force, as well as small billows of steam and fire, happening at the lower floor levels of one of the towers.
"Look at this shit. You're telling me there's just random ass explosions going on? Down here? We ain't even remotely close to where the plane collided. Bull fucking horse shit.'
The theorist explains that the planes were built by "crazed U.S. government scientists who watched too much Doctor Who, it was like that of a real life TARDIS experiment".
"They built these massive towers, for what? Business? Hell nah, have you seen the economy pre-9/11? It was shit. We didn't have the money nor energy for no goddamn tower of that size, and definitely not two."
We asked why the experiment would take place in the middle of a city as crowded as NYC. The theorist responded:
"It's hidden in plain sight. NYC's got all the resources in the world, right at your disposal. Nah, seriously man, look at these streets, there's a fuckin' garbage pile up just down the road. You know what kind of technology you can find in these piles? There's some fuckin' money to be made. Plus you get to make a nationwide scare if your experiment fucks up, and publicity means more money. They had all to gain and nothing to lose."
The theorist explains that any and all footage taken inside the Twin Towers pre-9/11 was simply simulated, props, or illusion. Footage of NYC recorded in a position respective to which the twin towers overlooked, was created via a clever series of mirrors originally sourcing from the "432 Park Avenue" building.
The theorist claims that any and all footage of the planes are "so fake, it's laughable", he states: "Nobody saw any planes... not in real life. Outside of what the TV stations would tell you, not a single soul saw an actual, physical plane hit the buildings. Hell, you could ask everyone in New York today, you won't find a single person who saw a plane."
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 [deleted] 2020-05-25
[removed]
1 trosdetio 2020-05-25
1 ConfusedLittleChild 2020-05-25
Maybe -hear me out- we shouldn't base our political worldviews off of cartoons. Or try to explain complex concepts with cartoons. Is that really so much to ask?
1 leva549 2020-05-25
Yeah.