Psychologists talk about the inkell menace a.k.a. menacels; virgins, feminists and menslibbers attack each other, mods delete comments

1  2020-05-28 by SomeTurdInTheWind

42 comments

do not comment or vote in linked threads

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

that whole thread boils down to "well these guys have mental health issues and as we know mental health issues are super-duper bad but they manifest as anti-fslur and anti-minority (lolwut) so fuck those guys amirite"

r psychology has to be one of the strongest cases against calling psychology a science

Blame mrsamsa for that

My problem with this...men are feeling left behind ideology is that a large part of their frustration that is that they feel they are losing power. What they perceive as losing power is actually women finally being able to speak for themselves and can speak up when treated poorly.

Well, this sounds very scientific and not at all as ideological bullshit dogma.

Womn have always been the primary victims of mn killing themselves.

They want this so much to be true, for incls to be a side effect of things getting better. It's lost on them that incls never held any power at all, or that things could actually be more complicated than that everything flows downstream of the central power dynamic of mn oppressing womn.

[removed]

Hi aqouta!

This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.

The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.

Goodbye.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I only follow the patriarchal aspects of Islam. Not the aspects that make you a cuck e.g. Abstaining from womanising, penetrating a sweet trap virgin ass and lowering your gaze.

Snapshots:

  1. Psychologists talk about the inkell... - archive.org, archive.today

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Snappy is a mūslimcêl? Inshallah

Funny to see them all dance around the problem and mrsamsa typically deleting anything that goes against his narrative.

Gold mine of deleted comments. The guy deleting comments for being unscientific is peak irony. Its fucking psychology.

Social👏 science👏is👏FAKE👏 science 👏

As someone with a degree in the social science... Yes.

Serious posting for a second, why is it a fake science? Are the studies done not scientific? If they are, why do we continue to take them seriously?

I should say that the vast majority of it is fake science. Most of the studies are built to show what the "researchers" want them to show. Want to show a gender wage gap? design a study that eliminates certain data points and then you can show that there is a 27% wage gap! Want to show that women are being sexually assaulted in large numbers, redefine what the definition of "assault" is, ask women a bunch of questions, apply your definition of assault to their answers, then publish. The fact that the women you interviewed don't view it as assault has no bearing on the findings, you've proved your point.

Seriously, as long as you include your definition of the "assault" in the study somewhere (usually buried in the middle), you can get away with this and the academics see this as legitimate. It's literally how we got the "1 in 4 college women are raped" statistic.

Another one that really kills me in the social sciences is that there are a bunch of studies that just get dropped because they didn't show what the researchers wanted them to show. When I was in my Masters program I worked on a research project for over a year. Until the data got parsed.

We were doing a ground breaking meta data study. We were going to PROVE that minorities are over represented in crime statistics because of economic factors. We controlled for every variable you could think of, geographic, income, parents, ect. Well the numbers showed that it isn't that it isn't minorities who are over represented, it is men who grew up without fathers. No matter the color of their skin, community they grew up in, or how rich/poor their parents were.

That study died immediately, because it didn't fit the narrative.

"The only sociologist who doesn't hate themself is one who hasn't finished their undergraduate studies yet."

Fields like psychology and sociology are notoriously bad at being scientifically rigorous, have a lot of bias and agenda in them, and there's a lot of misuse of statistics in the field. Iirc some group tried to reproduce a bunch of psychology experiments and about a third couldn't be reproduced and another third showed a much smaller impact than the original experiment.

Social science is called fake because of a few factors.

  1. Replication issues
  2. The nature of psychological testing makes it less robust then other sciences

Largely pre-supposed outcomes. Lack of statistical knowledge despite empirical papers depending on statistical significance. Cherry picking for empirical evidence, and ignoring counter evidence.(this is a big one).

Well it's also human nature.

An atom can't lie to you. A human being can.

Like let's take smoking in pregnant mothers.

A good mother who's pregnant and smokes is likely to lie and say they don't smoke (because they're ashamed) while the shitty ones don't give a fuck.

This leads into a situation where the only data you get is tainted

As someone who is currently working on a degree in a social science... Uh oh.

Dude, my many condolences. I feel extra stupid because it took me seeing the obvious bias and fraud to wake up, but by then I was less than a year from my MS so I finished it. Then I went into IT and haven't used my degrees at all.

I'm eventually hoping to become a psychiatrist, so I see psychology as a stepping stone to an end goal, and my classes are easy so I'll probably stick with it.

Good for you. I actually know two different husband and wife combos who are psychiatrist/psychologist pairs. The wives do the therapy portion and the husbands do the prescriptions. They are incredibly effective at treating some hard cases.

Oh, and Psychiatry is not soft science. It's emerging science. We still know so little about how the brain works.

Palahniuk wrote Fight Club in 1996. We now have internet porn, online dating, and an overall decrease in social capital among young people. The world is in for a wild ride.

But Tyler Durden says that self-improvement is masturbation

tyler Durden isn't a role model, he's the opposite end of the spectrum of pathetic materialist drone that the main character starts out as. The story is attempting to establish that there is a middle ground between nihilistic chaos and mindless order and you need to find that middle ground for yourself.

Yeah he sure is cool haha

in our peer reviewed research

.

we reviewed what the preceptors posted on ïncel forums

Imagine calling browsing ïncel forums "research". No quantitative analysis, no robust methodology, just "feelings"-- might as well be an op-ed.

Psychology is such a joke.😡

[deleted]

If something is peer-reviewed then it is irrefutably true. It's basically on the same level as 2+2=4 at that point.

Social science is for people who are not smart enough to study real science/ engineering but not pretentious/ highbrow to study arts/ business.

That's why journalism/ psychology/ gender studies majors should either learn👏to👏code👏 or work in McDonalds for the rest of their lives

I hate the 'learn to code' meme, I don't want to see the abominations these idiots cook up when they try to code, 80% of people who actually wanted to be programmers are incapable of producing good code, I can't imagine with your average activism major would produce.

[removed]

Hi Laca_Shoulda_Started!

This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.

The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.

Goodbye.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Psychology has a replication rate of less than 50%. I’m going to err on the side of common sense that everyone there is wrong.

I don’t get why they put marry older men as a complaint. Woman are the ones who choose, they want an older mate. You’d think scientists would understand evolutionary bio

don't call them scientists.

[removed]

Hi GitGudScrubzzz!

This is libel, and harassment - a civil tort, and a violation of the Reddit Content Policies.

The comment has been reported to Reddit administration. You have been banned from this subreddit. I reserve the right to sue you to reclaim damages to my reputation, and to pursue criminal charges against you. Reddit is likely to suspend your account.

Goodbye.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[deleted]