Yeesh. Buy them if you think JKR needs the money (one of the best things about her is that she has voluntarily gone from billionaire to centimillionaire by giving tons of it away) but do yourself a favour and don't read the fscking things.
This might come as a shock to you, but I do not care about your opinions, your ignorance or failure to comprehend the research, or what you believe. The only thing I care about, and I can not stress this enough, is what the empirical research says. And it says you are wrong.
Your personal opinion? worth as much as a pile of dog shit on the sidewalk to me. That is the absolute extent to which I care about what you think. This is where I stopped reading. I do not entertain the economic illiteracy of far leftists or far right-wing tards.
Both are equally misinformed on average, both are failures.
She is actively contributing to trans oppression. She doesn't even believe trans people are oppressed.
You ever noticed how it's always non-passing mtfs who claim oppression? Low effort lou ferrigno looking mother fuckers have to blame something for not attracting a lipstick lesbian.
Psst...guys...she didn't "just say most trans women are biological men". She devalued the existence of transgender people and questioned the legitimacy of their individual experiences and biology leading to them living their lives as another gender.
And if people don't want to be associated with a publisher that proudly boasts their objectively transphobic star client, that's entirely their decision. Just like it is the decision of the publisher to retain Rowling as a client for no reason besides the fact that she takes in a wild amount of money for them.
If you think Rowling was just explaining the difference between sex and gender, you're wrong.
If you think the publisher is championing an opposition to the "woke crowd", you're wrong.
If you think that spending energy toward commenting on a thread about this issue while clearly not understanding any aspect of the situation is worth it, you're still wrong.
EDIT: Lol okay everyone. Anyone want to explain how I'm wrong in either of those points? /r/books I'm disappointed in you. Guess being well-read doesn't mean anything for how you view the world.
9 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-06-23
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
2 tereria85 2020-06-23
This, sucks, now i have to read Harry Potter.
3 YourGreatDarshFace 2020-06-23
Yeesh. Buy them if you think JKR needs the money (one of the best things about her is that she has voluntarily gone from billionaire to centimillionaire by giving tons of it away) but do yourself a favour and don't read the fscking things.
2 Hell0Everyone 2020-06-23
Anytime I see the term "transphobia" - opinion immediately discarded.
3 sjmilty 2020-06-23
Ikr. Like why would I be scared of a man in a dress
1 SnapshillBot 2020-06-23
This might come as a shock to you, but I do not care about your opinions, your ignorance or failure to comprehend the research, or what you believe. The only thing I care about, and I can not stress this enough, is what the empirical research says. And it says you are wrong.
Your personal opinion? worth as much as a pile of dog shit on the sidewalk to me. That is the absolute extent to which I care about what you think. This is where I stopped reading. I do not entertain the economic illiteracy of far leftists or far right-wing tards.
Both are equally misinformed on average, both are failures.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 Neon_needles 2020-06-23
You ever noticed how it's always non-passing mtfs who claim oppression? Low effort lou ferrigno looking mother fuckers have to blame something for not attracting a lipstick lesbian.
1 ponypopper 2020-06-23
checkmate transfobes
1 [deleted] 2020-06-23
[removed]