Pure libertarianism and pure socialism are two ends of the same horseshoe that will never work for the same reasons.
Libertarianism requires 100% of the population to be capable enough to support themselves as individuals.
Socialism requires 100% of the population to be capable enough to support their neighbors.
Since 80% of burgers are clinically r_tarded, both systems are mathematically impossible here.
It also doesn't help that libertarian candidates operate on libertarian principles, meaning they have just slightly less morals than your average red or blue politician, and will post some stupid shit on Twitter for a handful of cash.
Yes, that's exactly why the party will never succeed, because anytime a candidate gains traction they will happily kill their own campaign for the first cash offer they get from the DNC or GOP.
#BlackLivesMatter means standing in solidarity with a mourning black community as we fight together to end qualified immunity, police brutality, sentencing disparities, and the war on drugs, not support of any “organization” by that name.
I guess not supporting any organisation means you can keep it nice and vague and keep changing what you 'really' mean whenever something unfortunate happens.
Every fucking time. "X isn't an organization, it's a grassroots movement/front/whatever that blahblahblah you can't hold responsible for the actions of individuals under its banner. What? No you can't defend yourself against them either you racist/sexist/whatever"
This might come as a shock to you, but I do not care about your opinions, your ignorance or failure to comprehend the research, or what you believe. The only thing I care about, and I can not stress this enough, is what the empirical research says. And it says you are wrong.
Your personal opinion? worth as much as a pile of dog shit on the sidewalk to me. That is the absolute extent to which I care about what you think. This is where I stopped reading. I do not entertain the economic illiteracy of far leftists or far right-wing tards.
Both are equally misinformed on average, both are failures.
24 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-07-11
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
16 D_Legare 2020-07-11
Pure libertarianism and pure socialism are two ends of the same horseshoe that will never work for the same reasons.
Libertarianism requires 100% of the population to be capable enough to support themselves as individuals.
Socialism requires 100% of the population to be capable enough to support their neighbors.
Since 80% of burgers are clinically r_tarded, both systems are mathematically impossible here.
It also doesn't help that libertarian candidates operate on libertarian principles, meaning they have just slightly less morals than your average red or blue politician, and will post some stupid shit on Twitter for a handful of cash.
8 iWasMolestedByElmo 2020-07-11
Isn’t the point of libertarianism having less morals and doing stupid shit for a handful of cash?
8 D_Legare 2020-07-11
Yes, that's exactly why the party will never succeed, because anytime a candidate gains traction they will happily kill their own campaign for the first cash offer they get from the DNC or GOP.
5 AnotherLibtardRekt 2020-07-11
Yeah basically, but they'll deny this.
11 SlowlyDying- 2020-07-11
Libertarian is meme ideology 🥰
7 aqouta 2020-07-11
All ideologies are memeplexes.
6 SlowlyDying- 2020-07-11
🔫 I will grill
1 BroughtToYouBySprite 2020-07-11
OOGA BOOGA
4 heretobefriends 2020-07-11
A libertarian is a blue-state Republican.
5 stalin_kulak 2020-07-11
How dare you tell me not be a racist ? A true libertarian would support an individual's freedom to be racist .
8 D_Legare 2020-07-11
Unironically though.
1 stalin_kulak 2020-07-11
This subreddit will be banned in the next banwave , unironically .
3 D_Legare 2020-07-11
I can only hope so, then I can finally have an excuse to stop using Reddit.
1 Platycel 2020-07-11
It's only after I stopped using Discord I realised how much time I've wasted watching the lowest of humanity having intellectual discussions
1 Platycel 2020-07-11
Yes
4 fuckedupridiculant 2020-07-11
I guess not supporting any organisation means you can keep it nice and vague and keep changing what you 'really' mean whenever something unfortunate happens.
2 Shitposting_Skeleton 2020-07-11
Every fucking time. "X isn't an organization, it's a grassroots movement/front/whatever that blahblahblah you can't hold responsible for the actions of individuals under its banner. What? No you can't defend yourself against them either you racist/sexist/whatever"
2 Fletch71011 2020-07-11
That's my future president!
1 SnapshillBot 2020-07-11
This might come as a shock to you, but I do not care about your opinions, your ignorance or failure to comprehend the research, or what you believe. The only thing I care about, and I can not stress this enough, is what the empirical research says. And it says you are wrong.
Your personal opinion? worth as much as a pile of dog shit on the sidewalk to me. That is the absolute extent to which I care about what you think. This is where I stopped reading. I do not entertain the economic illiteracy of far leftists or far right-wing tards.
Both are equally misinformed on average, both are failures.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 [deleted] 2020-07-11
[removed]
1 MrRightIsWhite 2020-07-11
This but unironically. I haven't heard one single word from this literally-who in support of repealing AoC laws. Fake libertarian.
1 ABaadPun 2020-07-11
ooowiw owwweeiiie my presidential.canadite told me not to be rawcist! This infringes on my liwberities so much i think I'm gonna shit and cum