He is going to play the retard and say shit like "oh no I'm going to lose guys :(" so that your average Norman decides not to vote him out because "drumpf is going to lose anyway". 2d chess
"Why!?!? Why won't Daddy run on his weak points instead of against our weak points?!? How dare he!"
As if anyone with half a brain couldn't see that the unflinching, uncritical support for rioting and looting wasn't a political gift to El Trumpo Grande.
Distraction fron that nearly 10% gdp hit. Suggesting something the most conservative scotus wouldn't let happen in a thousand years, yet will absolutely dominate the narrative the next few days.
Pants on head retarded, no doubt. Unfortunately it is matched by the retardedness of the other adults in the room.
Damn, he really manipulated the media by changing the narrative from "Economic growth slows down during global health crisis" to "Sitting President floats the idea of delaying elections indefinitely"
Good thing he still has other moves like "reveal a pro-choice stance", "push for stricter gun control", and "increase taxes" in his "distractions that won't make me bleed moderates" pile.
Maybe next time he has some mildly negative coverage he can come out as an atheist. That will definitely give the media something to talk about and will have no other consequences whatsoever.
And those children don't get shipped off to a parallel dimension when the school year starts. They interact with teachers, custodial and administrative staff, and their families.
The conservatard wheel of political spin has a few screws loose it seems.
I believe Daddy's point is that he'd rather consider canceling elections rather than have mail-in voting, which he has spoken out against many times. He would be fine with in-person elections, but COVIDcels are against it because we need muh eternal lockdown.
Of course, he worded it much less eloquently than I.
Yes, it's not that he's consistently been doing badly in the polls for 4 years, nothing he does is helping, and he's in a panic now. It's actually 4D chess!
Polling, especially online is flawed. It almost always favours the left-wing parties. Not to mention that there was some research recently in which 70% of conservatives said that theyāre afraid to make their political affiliations known.
National polls were spot on in 2016 you dumb cunt. It was only state polls that were that inaccurate, and there is no way around this, an 8 point polling deficit is bad. Hillary only had a lead that big for a few weeks.
Anything can technically happen, but is it likely to happen. And with 29% youāre not really placing too much of a possibility on it actually happening.
I never said itās immpossible you snarky dumbass, I said that itās unlikely. When discussing probabilities, a 30% probability is considered to be low, especially when discussing elections, due to the calculations which are performed.
Your understanding of statistics is literally below that of a 4th grader. This is astounding.
And no it wonāt literally happen 3/10 times.
On average, it will happen 3 out of 10 times. that is the expected value.
For the dice, the expected value is 1 out of 6 times. Rolling 3 ones on six rolls doesn't prove that wrong.
538 has a whole segment on the way they do it, read up a bit.
It's extremely obvious you are confusing polling in the 30% range to the models predicting a 30% chance to win. If Trump was polling in the 30% range, he would have a 100% chance to lose. They are two completely different things. You do understand that right?
The expected value doesnāt necessarily correlate with the actual results.
It should with a large enough sample size.
That's what you don't seem to get Nate Silver is literally just saying with these polling numbers based on historical results, we would expect Trump to win this % of the time.
And a 30% is not low at all. It's roughly equivalent to being down 8 points at halftime in a basketball game.
Also, comparing the probabilities of a basketball game and a presidential election donāt really make sense. Technically itās the same probability, but not really.
Also, comparing the probabilities of a basketball game and a presidential election donāt really make sense. Technically itās the same probability, but not really.
It's the same. Probability is probability.
It sounds like you are complaining that basketball has a higher sample size, while Nate Silver's model does not.
A model is only as good as the data put into it. Maybe Nate Silver's model is flawed, but Trump winning with a projected 30% chance doesn't prove that. We have no way of knowing. So people who say that Nate Silver's model was wrong because Trump won are idiots.
We do know form all the congressional races and governor races that Nate Silver's models are fairly accurate.
Itās not the same due to all the different variables which can potentially impact the election and the ones that can impact a basketball game.
Let me ask you this, you keep saying that 30% is a really high chance; would you put all of your life savings and everything you own on a bet that has a 30% probability of you winning?
Let me ask you this, you keep saying that 30% is a really high chance; would you put all of your life savings and everything you own on a bet that has a 30% probability of you winning?
Depends on the odds, obviously.
But a better example would be, if you took a bet that was 50/50 for even odds, and it sank to 30% odds, would you give up hope? if it went up to 70% would you get cocky, or would you still be worried?
I'm not saying 30% is high. I'm saying it's not low. You wouldn't be surprised if something with a 30% chance happened.
30% probability with 5 to 1 odds, just like Trump had. Would you make that bet?
I wouldn't bet my life savings on it, because I'm not one to take risks or gamble in general, but if the Vegas odds were 5 to 1 and Nate Silver's model was projecting a 30% chance to win, I'd certainly choose that side of the odds.
Still a lot of time though. If the economy and COVID get under control Trump could see a surge.
But I suspect it would also require something like the Comey memo a week before the election. Bill Barr seems to be willing to bullshit something like that up, so we will see.
But regardless,, Trump has an uphill battle solely because Biden simply just isn't hated as much as Hillary or he is.
Yeah. I'm interested too. There was been very little back and forth between the two candidates so far. Trump really hasn't been attacking Biden very much.
I think he's having a tough time finding something that sticks. With Hillary it was a lot easier. People would believe anything about her.
Not to mention that there was some research recently in which 70% of conservatives said that theyāre afraid to make their political affiliations known.
That wasn't on the first page of results so I posted the wrong thing to do the bookmark joke. The actual graphs are on your side but you still have the wrong sexual orientation.
Such a disappointing end to Ed's story, just like the show he constantly shit posts about.
I will miss his interactions with grandpa tick tock and how Ed and Circo used make each other seethe so hard while always pretending they were the calm one.
Ed angered numerous people just by existing. The amount of spergouts he caused was top tier, he was a once in a generation dramatard and will go down as an all time great
Ed is all around in the dark. He's everywhere, wherever you look. Wherever there's a fight so bored people have lolcows, he's there. Wherever there's an Iowa boomer reporting a guy, he's there. He's in the way guys š“š“š“ when they're not impressed. He's in the way kids laugh when they know there's a Marsey coming.
Literally everyone (with money) is looking at the GDP numbers lol. I'm ngl, this tweet just sticks out as another retarded thing our resident retard has said. Where's that okayretard.jpg?
Both. This will be in the news for a couple weeks, then the GDP hit and coronavirus numbers will surge back because neither of those will be going away anytime soon. The same thing that's happened with every other flash-in-the-pan Trump event over the past few months.
Oh, yeah, spinning the narrative away from something everyone already knew by saying shit that will drive more Democrats to the booths while further alienating moderates and fence-sitters. Genius!
I think he just says random shit and things end up working out . That or people end up not caring because it's either vote for him or let the MA'AM burn down their house for the black people.
It's less 4D chess and more likely a magical toupee which he bought from one of those 1980's movie NY chinese merchants.
You don't have to be a chess master to be able to predict exactly how the liberal media is gonna react to you in every circumstance, though. They're painfully predictable.
And that tweet is such obvious bait. Some big "fish" is going to bite with a "we can do both (hold the election and secure the mail-in vote)" and Trump's going to respond with a "that's what I've been saying about preventing covid and reopening the schools/economy."
God dammit I wish I could throw out random shit on twitter and do these things. I hope he just shitposts on twatter for the rest of his days and everyone has a meltdown. I wish he would post like a day later with "haha trolled" just for the responses.
There were very many angry leftoids even so far as calling holding an election during a pandemic murder. Surely they will remain ideologically consistent and maintain that holding a presidential election during a pandemic amounts to murder.
195 comments
1 ItsSugar 2020-07-30
This topic is currently causing a rift between cultists and "law and order" conservatives over at /r/IWasntBreastfed
Loving all the censorship, btw
3 rocksoliddesu 2020-07-30
He is going to play the retard and say shit like "oh no I'm going to lose guys :(" so that your average Norman decides not to vote him out because "drumpf is going to lose anyway". 2d chess
1 foodporn_mods_r_nazi 2020-07-30
My title was better but I'm not an approved submitter š.
This should generate good drama. I'm sure /r/politics will respond rationally and calmly.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
22 minutes ago, and already three awards. The leftoids at r/politics sure like spending their parents money on imaginary shit.
1 foodporn_mods_r_nazi 2020-07-30
/r/politics/new has this about 100 times.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Of course it does. At this point, I think heās just feeding of their hate.
1 Platycel 2020-07-30
So do I tbh
1 cfbWORKING 2020-07-30
But will auto mod anything remotely against the narrative as already submitted
1 jimmerz28 2020-07-30
Sweaty please.
We all know they spend a lot of it on funko pops.
And they certainly don't spend it on paying rent!
1 MegaDace 2020-07-30
Why would they gift a fucking repost of a news article? It's not like the OP created content or anything, they literally just linked a news article.
I really hope I don't catch the brainworms that reddit spreads.
1 VidiotGamer 2020-07-30
r/politics is so hilariously unhinged.
Here they are taking umbrage at Daddy for capitalizing on the "mostly peaceful protests" that have been happening for like 2 months now:
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/i0jpsh/donald_trumps_campaign_is_pretending_theres_no/
"Why!?!? Why won't Daddy run on his weak points instead of against our weak points?!? How dare he!"
As if anyone with half a brain couldn't see that the unflinching, uncritical support for rioting and looting wasn't a political gift to El Trumpo Grande.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Daddy always knew how to make people mad in 260 characters or less.
3 tereria85 2020-07-30
He wants to lose, he hates being president, you can tell.
0 [deleted] 2020-07-30
[deleted]
1 CommissarCletus 2020-07-30
Maybe his next suggestion should be to up the character maximum.
1 -M-o-X- 2020-07-30
Only for his account though
4 TrailerParkRide 2020-07-30
Daddy gets two scoops š
1 -M-o-X- 2020-07-30
Distraction fron that nearly 10% gdp hit. Suggesting something the most conservative scotus wouldn't let happen in a thousand years, yet will absolutely dominate the narrative the next few days.
Pants on head retarded, no doubt. Unfortunately it is matched by the retardedness of the other adults in the room.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Yeah, heās spinning the narative away from the GDP, and they donāt even realize it.
2 ItsSugar 2020-07-30
FTFY
3 jffnc11 2020-07-30
You mean daddy is the only person capable of outsmarting daddy? Heās two steps ahead of himself?
woah
1 ItsSugar 2020-07-30
Damn, he really manipulated the media by changing the narrative from "Economic growth slows down during global health crisis" to "Sitting President floats the idea of delaying elections indefinitely"
Good thing he still has other moves like "reveal a pro-choice stance", "push for stricter gun control", and "increase taxes" in his "distractions that won't make me bleed moderates" pile.
Maybe next time he has some mildly negative coverage he can come out as an atheist. That will definitely give the media something to talk about and will have no other consequences whatsoever.
5 Whaddaulookinat 2020-07-30
I'm waiting for CNN to drone on trying to analyze a random anime gif from him
3 stupidpolpot 2020-07-30
We're in the middle of a pandemic, are you willing to accept all the deaths your "freedom to die of covid" elections will cost this country?
4 ItsSugar 2020-07-30
Pretty hard to justify pushing for schools to reopen while simultaneously declaring the situation too dangerous to hold elections š¤š¤š¤
4 stupidpolpot 2020-07-30
Children are much more resilient than voters.
2 ItsSugar 2020-07-30
And those children don't get shipped off to a parallel dimension when the school year starts. They interact with teachers, custodial and administrative staff, and their families.
The conservatard wheel of political spin has a few screws loose it seems.
2 stupidpolpot 2020-07-30
Teachers can wear masks. It worked for protestors.
2 DefectiveDelfin 2020-07-30
Voters can wear masks.
Just admit you're simpin for donnie
1 stupidpolpot 2020-07-30
Masks choke voters
1 TonyDanzaClaus 2020-07-30
Voters can wear masks, you wonderful genius.
1 stupidpolpot 2020-07-30
Masks restrict voter respiration.
1 TonyDanzaClaus 2020-07-30
It's a good thing children don't live with adults. Otherwise they could bring the virus home to them.
1 stupidpolpot 2020-07-30
Parents can quarantine children in the backyard.
1 genuinegrill 2020-07-30
I believe Daddy's point is that he'd rather consider canceling elections rather than have mail-in voting, which he has spoken out against many times. He would be fine with in-person elections, but COVIDcels are against it because we need muh eternal lockdown.
Of course, he worded it much less eloquently than I.
1 TonyDanzaClaus 2020-07-30
I think his point is that he'd rather cancel an election he might lose instead of having it and risk humiliation.
2 Al-Farouq-Aminu 2020-07-30
Only the weak will die anyways
2 stupidpolpot 2020-07-30
Shit, it makes some people hella strong. You never know.
1 thajugganuat 2020-07-30
Yet you brought it up and the top comment on the megathread brought up the gdp
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Iām talking about the media companies, CNN has got it on their front page since he made the tweet.
1 cfbWORKING 2020-07-30
ddf coping on boomer droppings
6 DuckSosu 2020-07-30
Literally more delusional than /r/politics. Impressive.
1 GeauxHouston22 2020-07-30
I just got banned there for trolling that big ass q anon thread again after repeated warnings
F
2 DannyLee90 2020-07-30
The beauxmers lost a real one. š
1 Ingelri 2020-07-30
Thank u for ur sacrifice moran
1 mustaamustempi 2020-07-30
screens or stfu
1 Redactor0 2020-07-30
Wow, he exudes this aura of masculine confidence. We won so much that we're just getting tired of winning.
1 GoodFaithGregory 2020-07-30
FourMoreMonths
1 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
This guy is such a baiter.
He's basically getting MSM to campaign for him by making sure they amplify his "concern" to the level necessary for Trumpists to mobilize.
The whole "I'm in trouble" shtick is a ruse.
1 Redactor0 2020-07-30
Yes, it's not that he's consistently been doing badly in the polls for 4 years, nothing he does is helping, and he's in a panic now. It's actually 4D chess!
1 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
Voting mobs is what counts.
Reddit snickering, counts not.
1 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2020-07-30
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/national/
3 DuckSosu 2020-07-30
Holy shit, given the response to this it seems /r/Drama really is filled with innumerate brainlets.
1 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2020-07-30
Yeah this sub is dumb as fuck sometimes, lol.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Remember how well those polls did in 2016?
Polling, especially online is flawed. It almost always favours the left-wing parties. Not to mention that there was some research recently in which 70% of conservatives said that theyāre afraid to make their political affiliations known.
1 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2020-07-30
National polls were spot on in 2016 you dumb cunt. It was only state polls that were that inaccurate, and there is no way around this, an 8 point polling deficit is bad. Hillary only had a lead that big for a few weeks.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Your mommaās a dumb cunt for letting you on the internet without supervision.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
538 had Clinton at a 5 point lead. And her odds at 71%.
1 dampon 2020-07-30
Everyone knows something with a 29% chance can't happen!!!!
No one has ever flipped a coin and had it land on heads 2 times in a row!!
God, no wonder rightoids lose their jobs to illegals.
2 Eva_TryNotBeinRacist 2020-07-30
TIL the election was a random coin toss and not a mass collective of people's conscious decisions
3 dampon 2020-07-30
A child's understanding of predictive modeling right here.
Good job.
1 Eva_TryNotBeinRacist 2020-07-30
yes, i did correctly identify your post as such.
it was nothing, really
3 dampon 2020-07-30
No u.
There. We reached the logical conclusion of this conversation.
1 Eva_TryNotBeinRacist 2020-07-30
bruh you know you made it seem like the election was determined via a coin toss by Allah xerself
1 dampon 2020-07-30
I was explaining how percents and probability work to rightoids.
You know very well anything beyond flipping a coin would be too complicated for them to grasp.
I mean look at you right now. Having trouble grasping what an analogy is.
1 Eva_TryNotBeinRacist 2020-07-30
i know what a bad analogy is
and thats why i replied lol
1 dampon 2020-07-30
I look forward to your research paper on the intricacies of predictive modeling in your next comment.
1 Eva_TryNotBeinRacist 2020-07-30
it's coming out about a week after yours about the benefits of daily dilation
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Anything can technically happen, but is it likely to happen. And with 29% youāre not really placing too much of a possibility on it actually happening.
2 dampon 2020-07-30
LOL.
Almost a third of a chance isn't likely?
That's nonsense. If you had a third of a chance of getting injured doing something, would you do it?
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Depends on the injury.
1 dampon 2020-07-30
Clearly you already have brain damage, so this shouldn't come as shock.
Russian roulette only has a 16.7% chance of killing you. If 29% is almost zero chance, 16.7% must be literally impossible! You should try it tonight!
I hear if you play it 6 times by yourself it can really be fun!
2 jffnc11 2020-07-30
I never said itās immpossible you snarky dumbass, I said that itās unlikely. When discussing probabilities, a 30% probability is considered to be low, especially when discussing elections, due to the calculations which are performed.
1 dampon 2020-07-30
30% is 30% you dumbass.
Doesn't matter if it's an election or a fucking dice roll. It's the same god damn chance, which is pretty high.
It'll literally happen 3 out of 10 times.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
It matters idiot, due to the way itās calculated. 538 has a whole segment on the way they do it, read up a bit.
In which universe is 3 out of 10 times considered high? And no it wonāt literally happen 3/10 times.
The probability of getting a 1 on a dice roll is technically 1/6, but try rolling the dice 6 times and see what you get.
0 dampon 2020-07-30
Holy shit...
Your understanding of statistics is literally below that of a 4th grader. This is astounding.
On average, it will happen 3 out of 10 times. that is the expected value.
For the dice, the expected value is 1 out of 6 times. Rolling 3 ones on six rolls doesn't prove that wrong.
It's extremely obvious you are confusing polling in the 30% range to the models predicting a 30% chance to win. If Trump was polling in the 30% range, he would have a 100% chance to lose. They are two completely different things. You do understand that right?
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
The expected value doesnāt necessarily correlate with the actual results.
No you fucking retard, Iām talking about their forecasting model for predicting the voting results, not about the polling numbers.
2 dampon 2020-07-30
It should with a large enough sample size.
That's what you don't seem to get Nate Silver is literally just saying with these polling numbers based on historical results, we would expect Trump to win this % of the time.
And a 30% is not low at all. It's roughly equivalent to being down 8 points at halftime in a basketball game.
https://imgur.com/RS2pmss
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Key word āshouldā.
Also, comparing the probabilities of a basketball game and a presidential election donāt really make sense. Technically itās the same probability, but not really.
2 Doesnt_Draw_Anything 2020-07-30
Just admit that statistics confuse you
1 dampon 2020-07-30
It's the same. Probability is probability.
It sounds like you are complaining that basketball has a higher sample size, while Nate Silver's model does not.
A model is only as good as the data put into it. Maybe Nate Silver's model is flawed, but Trump winning with a projected 30% chance doesn't prove that. We have no way of knowing. So people who say that Nate Silver's model was wrong because Trump won are idiots.
We do know form all the congressional races and governor races that Nate Silver's models are fairly accurate.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Itās not the same due to all the different variables which can potentially impact the election and the ones that can impact a basketball game.
Let me ask you this, you keep saying that 30% is a really high chance; would you put all of your life savings and everything you own on a bet that has a 30% probability of you winning?
1 dampon 2020-07-30
Depends on the odds, obviously.
But a better example would be, if you took a bet that was 50/50 for even odds, and it sank to 30% odds, would you give up hope? if it went up to 70% would you get cocky, or would you still be worried?
I'm not saying 30% is high. I'm saying it's not low. You wouldn't be surprised if something with a 30% chance happened.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
30% probability with 5 to 1 odds, just like Trump had. Would you make that bet?
I probably would give up.
1 dampon 2020-07-30
I wouldn't bet my life savings on it, because I'm not one to take risks or gamble in general, but if the Vegas odds were 5 to 1 and Nate Silver's model was projecting a 30% chance to win, I'd certainly choose that side of the odds.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Interesting.
On a serious note. Who do you think will win this year?
1 dampon 2020-07-30
If polls hold, Biden.
Still a lot of time though. If the economy and COVID get under control Trump could see a surge.
But I suspect it would also require something like the Comey memo a week before the election. Bill Barr seems to be willing to bullshit something like that up, so we will see.
But regardless,, Trump has an uphill battle solely because Biden simply just isn't hated as much as Hillary or he is.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Yeah, I think if the economy and pandemic get somewhat better it might be a tight squeeze in Trumpās favor.
I just hope thereāll be debates, thatāll be a goldmine for this sub.
1 dampon 2020-07-30
Yeah. I'm interested too. There was been very little back and forth between the two candidates so far. Trump really hasn't been attacking Biden very much.
I think he's having a tough time finding something that sticks. With Hillary it was a lot easier. People would believe anything about her.
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
True.
2 shitpersonality 2020-07-30
Uhhhh what?
1 kratoswithcappuccino 2020-07-30
literally what are you talking about now you sound legitimately tarded
0 S-K_123 2020-07-30
Rightoids can't do math exhibit 12384743930
1 leopold_leopoldovich 2020-07-30
Cope
3 dampon 2020-07-30
Rightoid: A 29% chance will never happen!
Also Rightoid: Can't wait to spend $50 on scratchers tonight!
1 leopold_leopoldovich 2020-07-30
Seethe
1 Canadapoli 2020-07-30
You got trounced
1 PlacatedPlatypus 2020-07-30
This has already been posted in this very thread
0 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2020-07-30
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Most of the adjusted polls had her at 5 points.
0 Kayayak 2020-07-30
Lmao you linked sources that proves the other guy right you dum dum hahahahahahahahahah
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
And what does it say below that? Do they maybe adjust it for the national level?
1 Kayayak 2020-07-30
Yikes imagine using the downvote button because you're that mad that you're a dum dum
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Imagine calling others a dum dum and not reading that even though itās based on state polls, that itās adjusted for the national level.
Also, I didnāt downvote you. You are aware that there are other people using this site?
1 unapprovedcel 2020-07-30
Conservatives are pussies confirmed
1 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
https://e.huffpost.com/pollster/share/2016-general-election-trump-vs-clinton.png?1490979763
1 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2020-07-30
Anything Huffpost says should be disregarded on sight.
2 AIDS_IS_A_CHOICE 2020-07-30
https://i.imgur.com/CIT1SNv.png
3 Blizzxx 2020-07-30
The actual fuck are those folders? I geninuely hope you included those just to troll cause jesus christ
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-07-30
The "Blood (other)" is especially disconcerting
8 jubbergun 2020-07-30
The funny one is the last one. After all that stuff you finally get a folder that says "Gross Stuff," LOL.
1 Bummunism 2020-07-30
Came here to say this
2 ReddneckwithaD 2020-07-30
Good shit right there
3 onafriday 2020-07-30
Degenerate
1 hmunkey 2020-07-30
Thatās chance of winning lol, not the actual poll figures. Winning with a 30% chance of winning could just mean you were down 1-2% in the polls.
I know youāre not that dumb.
1 AIDS_IS_A_CHOICE 2020-07-30
That wasn't on the first page of results so I posted the wrong thing to do the bookmark joke. The actual graphs are on your side but you still have the wrong sexual orientation.
1 totalrandomperson 2020-07-30
They still show 49 Hilldawg - 41 Trump in August. with 8 percent for Gary Johnson. The winner is not certain yet.
1 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
1 YoshFromYsraelDntBan 2020-07-30
cope seethe dilate have sex
1 Corporal-Hicks 2020-07-30
hes going to drop out any day now
2 SnideBumbling 2020-07-30
increasingly nervous man
1 FagglePuss 2020-07-30
Oh no not the polls!
1 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2020-07-30
https://imgur.com/8HnT78H
5 ShitTornadoToOz 2020-07-30
This never gets old.
4 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2020-07-30
I think it might be an Ed original TBH, I got to keep his spirit living on.
6 ShitTornadoToOz 2020-07-30
These streets have taken too many dramatards from us. 2019 was especially rough.
2 CriticalAttempt2 2020-07-30
What happened to Ed in the end? Thereās no way he had the mental restraint to just stop posting
5 Matues49 2020-07-30
It seems he has semi-retired and now spents most of his time shitposting on GOT subreddits, of all places.
9 DuckSosu 2020-07-30
Such a disappointing end to Ed's story, just like the show he constantly shit posts about.
I will miss his interactions with grandpa tick tock and how Ed and Circo used make each other seethe so hard while always pretending they were the calm one.
3 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2020-07-30
He came back but we scared him away.
2 SweatDrinker 2020-07-30
Who cares, Ed was just another gimmickposter among others.
7 CriticalAttempt2 2020-07-30
Honestly would pick him over most modern day dramatards, you included, you massive f slur
3 SweatDrinker 2020-07-30
Thanks, it means alot to me
2 CriticalAttempt2 2020-07-30
uwu
6 804-929-4988 2020-07-30
Ed angered numerous people just by existing. The amount of spergouts he caused was top tier, he was a once in a generation dramatard and will go down as an all time great
2 600_lbs_of_sin 2020-07-30
š“š“š“
2 Redactor0 2020-07-30
Ed is all around in the dark. He's everywhere, wherever you look. Wherever there's a fight so bored people have lolcows, he's there. Wherever there's an Iowa boomer reporting a guy, he's there. He's in the way guys š“š“š“ when they're not impressed. He's in the way kids laugh when they know there's a Marsey coming.
4 CriticalAttempt2 2020-07-30
God bless his heart I miss his suspiciously agenda oriented snooze posting
1 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Heās spinning the narative away from the bad GDP numbers, and theyāre all just eating it up.
Classic daddy.
5 WistopherWalken 2020-07-30
Except here we are talking about both the shit GDP numbers and his retarded election comments. 200iq
3 jffnc11 2020-07-30
And what do you think the news is going to focus on?
4 WistopherWalken 2020-07-30
Probably both, you god damn idiot. Where the fuck do you think you heard about the GDP numbers in the first place?
4 jffnc11 2020-07-30
Or theyāll probably focus mainly on the tweet, instead of the GDP numbers, as theyāre already doing. Look at CNNs frontpage, fucktard.
2 WistopherWalken 2020-07-30
Literally everyone (with money) is looking at the GDP numbers lol. I'm ngl, this tweet just sticks out as another retarded thing our resident retard has said. Where's that okayretard.jpg?
-1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2020-07-30
Trump tweets stick around for a week or two. GDP numbers are here until the end of the year.
4D chess!
0 UpvoteIfYouDare 2020-07-30
Both. This will be in the news for a couple weeks, then the GDP hit and coronavirus numbers will surge back because neither of those will be going away anytime soon. The same thing that's happened with every other flash-in-the-pan Trump event over the past few months.
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2020-07-30
Oh, yeah, spinning the narrative away from something everyone already knew by saying shit that will drive more Democrats to the booths while further alienating moderates and fence-sitters. Genius!
1 wabasada 2020-07-30
I think he just says random shit and things end up working out . That or people end up not caring because it's either vote for him or let the MA'AM burn down their house for the black people.
It's less 4D chess and more likely a magical toupee which he bought from one of those 1980's movie NY chinese merchants.
2 SnideBumbling 2020-07-30
Imagine being Donald Trump and your ineptitude doesn't matter at all because your enemies are so fucking retarded that they ended up working for you.
6 CRYSTAL_HYPOTHESIS 2020-07-30
He's got a lucky rabbits foot on his key ring
4 Platycel 2020-07-30
On his cock ring, the last thing capable of maintaining his erection.
1 Platycel 2020-07-30
Daddy is a reincarnation of the God of Luck.
1 leopold_leopoldovich 2020-07-30
You don't have to be a chess master to be able to predict exactly how the liberal media is gonna react to you in every circumstance, though. They're painfully predictable.
4 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
That's the best part.
The eagerness with which they go for it, from any angle imaginable, it's really amazing.
1 RedPillDessert 2020-07-30
The Man versus the Ma'am.
1 Alicesnakebae 2020-07-30
i wonder if he wishes he was as smart as people say he is
1 toughen-up_buttercup 2020-07-30
No way, why would he wish something like that? He already knows that he's a very stable genius.
1 wwaalleess 2020-07-30
Trump: says some retarded shit
Rightoids: ackshually what he meant is genius
It must be exhausting spending all day defending every dumb thing he says.
0 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
Saying someone made a good tactical move in the context of the game played does not mean you defend the guy who made the move.
You need dial down your over-socialized bullshit.
1 wwaalleess 2020-07-30
Imagine having a fanbase that's so fickle that you have to whine like a bitch in order to get them to vote for you lol
3 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
Hey, dont hold back, man...
2 Platycel 2020-07-30
š¤
1 GeauxHouston22 2020-07-30
LMAO goddamn
2 PlacatedPlatypus 2020-07-30
Unironic 5dchessposting, never thought I'd see it.
1 tereria85 2020-07-30
Get the fuck out, lmao.
1 S-K_123 2020-07-30
Just because he traded queens in chess with uncle joe doesn't undo the fact that daddy donald is still down a dozen pieces, conservalarp
2 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
Listen, I cannot wait for the debates bc Biden is even worse than Hillary.
If you thought "you'll be in jail" was petty, you haven't seen anything yet.
/r/drama will link up to at least 5 SRD meltdowns daily
/r/politics will explode
It will be glorius.
5 S-K_123 2020-07-30
I just wanna see two senior citizens fight why do I have to watch them try to debate reeeee
1 Lehk 2020-07-30
Dementia can cause violent behavior, there is no guarantee the debates won't devolve into a brawl on air.
1 TonyDanzaClaus 2020-07-30
He may even go so far as to lose the election so that the media will talk about his loss instead of Biden's win.
1 newcomer_ts 2020-07-30
Holy smokes... /r/politics is leaking lmao
As a white man, I dont care who wins elections.
1 sheepgobaaaaaaaaa 2020-07-30
can you teach me to be this based?
1 [deleted] 2020-07-30
[removed]
1 Matues49 2020-07-30
0 jubbergun 2020-07-30
And that tweet is such obvious bait. Some big "fish" is going to bite with a "we can do both (hold the election and secure the mail-in vote)" and Trump's going to respond with a "that's what I've been saying about preventing covid and reopening the schools/economy."
1 MR_T_POWER_SLAM 2020-07-30
Quite literally the end of Democracy apparently
Jesse Pinkman weighs in
1 Jerouva 2020-07-30
oh god oh fuck. I must post to r /AskTrumpSuppprters askimg them of how they think of this
BRB
1 Lysis10 2020-07-30
God dammit I wish I could throw out random shit on twitter and do these things. I hope he just shitposts on twatter for the rest of his days and everyone has a meltdown. I wish he would post like a day later with "haha trolled" just for the responses.
1 DongoDongoP 2020-07-30
I don't know why this interjection is so funny to me.
1 chuck_portis 2020-07-30
That's the good mail
1 The_Live_Ghost 2020-07-30
Absentee voting is very legal and very cool
1 wwaalleess 2020-07-30
Imagine trying to make people believe that these are different things and people are so retarded that it works.
6 AIU-comment 2020-07-30
ACA vs Obamacare again. Except now in ONE idiotic tweet.
1 [deleted] 2020-07-30
[removed]
1 Manchu_Fist 2020-07-30
DADDY NOOOOOOO! WE CANT DELAY THE VOTERINOS!!!!!
1 samuelelbongo 2020-07-30
He couldn't delay without house approval anyway. Of course various retards will take the bait and think it's the apocalypse regardless.
1 newtoandroidGMU 2020-07-30
what a fucking idiot, even the conservative sub is saying as much
1 Vegan_doggodiddler 2020-07-30
Anyone remember when reddit was seething over the Wisconsin governor not being able to delay the supreme court election a few months ago?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/comments/fwa0sf/wisconsin_supreme_court_blocks_order_to_postpone
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/fw8qqp/wisconsin_election_back_on_for_tuesday_in_the
2 Redactor0 2020-07-30
Imagine thinking that's in any way comparable to the US presidential election. š
1 Vegan_doggodiddler 2020-07-30
Cope.
1 BigBrownDog12 2020-07-30
That's because those roids thought they were going to win
1 Vegan_doggodiddler 2020-07-30
There were very many angry leftoids even so far as calling holding an election during a pandemic murder. Surely they will remain ideologically consistent and maintain that holding a presidential election during a pandemic amounts to murder.
1 Giulio-Cesare 2020-07-30
Delay it by 45 minutes.
1 tiptopkitkat 2020-07-30
Imagining a person who bankrupt casinos being able to keep an economy from not tanking bigly.
1 Chuck-Brown 2020-07-30
So, uh...
Maybe that's why he's suggesting it.
1 KingRuler07 2020-07-30
Alex Jones was right all along we own him a big apology.