I hope that this is the end. r/Drama has a unique way of bringing out the worst in people. It really does, I think. The dynamic here is just so fucking toxic and it turns people into the worst possible people they can be.
Drama is an addiction. It should be classified as something more like heroine or meth than a game.
The legacy of Drama has been written large in blood, quite literally. Several Drama posters have committed mayocide, and this place enabled their downward spirals. u/DarqWolff's insanity was made far worse by this place. I've come to the conclusion that the internet, as a social platform, was a mistake.
It radicalizes people by isolating them with other people just like them and so they spiral into the worst versions of themselves. Drama made me a worse person, and it's made most of you worse people. It's been the breeding ground of pedophile groomers, alt-right killers, and suicidal narcissists. This place is a total fucking shithole and I spent three years of my life that I'll never get back immersed in it. It was a total waste and I'm going to regret this period of my life for the rest of my existence as will most of you.
Even the most moral people have been made worse for being here. I think that the fundamental issue with Drama is that due to the way reputations work, betrayal, secret cabals, two-faced bs, and bad faith negotiation isn't just prioritized, it's the only effective way to operate. Being a huge piece of shit to everybody around you and tearing them down like crabs in a bucket isn't just a viable strategy, it's actually the only viable strategy once Drama reached a certain size. It's all just a bunch of assholes circlejerking over how bad all the other assholes are, because it's impossible to do anything else short of outright genociding anybody who poses any sort of threat to Drama's security and dominance.
For a while before arr drama basically referred to them both as Dementia Daddy without distinction. You'd see a thread talking about Dementia Daddy and you'd have no idea at first glance which one they were talking about.
Some of the Trump lawsuits have been r-slurred in the extreme, but the ruling out of WI is a bit ridiculous. They're tossing it out because the campaign didn't complain sooner, but if the campaign had filed a suit before or during the election the court would have tossed it and said they didn't have standing because they hadn't suffered any harm. It's kind of a catch 22.
You may have a point. If anything, filing suit citing the possibility of harm and having it tossed for standing would at least make it difficult to toss the case a second time after harm actually occurs on the basis of laches.
How about if the evidence can only be AFTER the counting has taken place? For example, if you're seeing ballots rescanned in multiple times instead of just once (like the alleged Fulton County footage I'm seeing on th£donald.win right now), you can't predict they're going to do that before it's actually taken place. The crime has to have taken place. That's how judgement usually works (unless thought crime counts).
It's ridiculous in my view. Cases are being thrown out on procedural grounds rather than merit.
I'd post it here, but I'm wary that Reddit will censor me or worse (articles of elecSion fraud are banned, not sure about videos directly). The video is on the you-know-where win site though with the title beginning: "7 min Video from GA hearing today includes".
To be clear, I'm not sure the aforementioned video is proving anything - I was just using it as an example where if there WERE fraud going on, it would have to taken up after the crime was committed. It seems preposterous the judges wouldn't consider such cases.
Maybe, maybe not, but it's one thing to refuse to hear the case, and another thing to hear it, with the public listening and making its own judgments, and making an actual ruling. Like I said, some of the Trump lawsuits have been r-slurred in the extreme, which is why it's curious that instead of letting Trump's legal team (and others filing these suits) make fools of themselves in full view of the public courts are going out of their way to avoid hearing these cases.
24 comments
8 ExtremelyOnlineG 2020-12-30
If they stop filing these it'll be harder for them to embezzle money out of his re-election/election-defense fund.
This is the only reason these keep happening.
7 RecallRethuglicans 2020-12-30
I disagree. Rudy may just actually be retarded enough to believe this.
6 The_Dramanomicon 2020-12-30
May? This ni🅱️🅱️a went on tv leaking motor oil and shit.
1 Ed__ButteredToast 2020-12-30
Lol
4 BroboxylicAcid 2020-12-30
Heh.
2 SnapshillBot 2020-12-30
I hope that this is the end. r/Drama has a unique way of bringing out the worst in people. It really does, I think. The dynamic here is just so fucking toxic and it turns people into the worst possible people they can be.
Drama is an addiction. It should be classified as something more like heroine or meth than a game.
The legacy of Drama has been written large in blood, quite literally. Several Drama posters have committed mayocide, and this place enabled their downward spirals. u/DarqWolff's insanity was made far worse by this place. I've come to the conclusion that the internet, as a social platform, was a mistake.
It radicalizes people by isolating them with other people just like them and so they spiral into the worst versions of themselves. Drama made me a worse person, and it's made most of you worse people. It's been the breeding ground of pedophile groomers, alt-right killers, and suicidal narcissists. This place is a total fucking shithole and I spent three years of my life that I'll never get back immersed in it. It was a total waste and I'm going to regret this period of my life for the rest of my existence as will most of you.
Even the most moral people have been made worse for being here. I think that the fundamental issue with Drama is that due to the way reputations work, betrayal, secret cabals, two-faced bs, and bad faith negotiation isn't just prioritized, it's the only effective way to operate. Being a huge piece of shit to everybody around you and tearing them down like crabs in a bucket isn't just a viable strategy, it's actually the only viable strategy once Drama reached a certain size. It's all just a bunch of assholes circlejerking over how bad all the other assholes are, because it's impossible to do anything else short of outright genociding anybody who poses any sort of threat to Drama's security and dominance.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
2 tenebrous_cloud 2020-12-30
Phew I was worried dad might not be president in a couple weeks but this will be the one that overturns the tyranny of the majority
2 EarlCampbellsMeat 2020-12-30
We are tired of being called lunatics...we have the receipts...!!!!
1 aqouta 2020-12-30
Ok, I'm going to admit it, I never know what DDR stood for and I'm too afraid to ask.
4 -M-o-X- 2020-12-30
Dementia dad republican vs dementia dad democrat
3 BroboxylicAcid 2020-12-30
For a while before arr drama basically referred to them both as Dementia Daddy without distinction. You'd see a thread talking about Dementia Daddy and you'd have no idea at first glance which one they were talking about.
2 ExtremelyOnlineG 2020-12-30
calling them both dementia daddy was a solid bit
1 Doesnt_Draw_Anything 2020-12-30
That was part of the fun
1 StrategicReserve 2020-12-30
1 jubbergun 2020-12-30
Some of the Trump lawsuits have been r-slurred in the extreme, but the ruling out of WI is a bit ridiculous. They're tossing it out because the campaign didn't complain sooner, but if the campaign had filed a suit before or during the election the court would have tossed it and said they didn't have standing because they hadn't suffered any harm. It's kind of a catch 22.
1 -M-o-X- 2020-12-30
You can cite future harm as an injury in courts you just have to have a good case.
2 jubbergun 2020-12-30
You may have a point. If anything, filing suit citing the possibility of harm and having it tossed for standing would at least make it difficult to toss the case a second time after harm actually occurs on the basis of laches.
1 RedPillDessert 2020-12-30
How about if the evidence can only be AFTER the counting has taken place? For example, if you're seeing ballots rescanned in multiple times instead of just once (like the alleged Fulton County footage I'm seeing on th£donald.win right now), you can't predict they're going to do that before it's actually taken place. The crime has to have taken place. That's how judgement usually works (unless thought crime counts).
It's ridiculous in my view. Cases are being thrown out on procedural grounds rather than merit.
1 -M-o-X- 2020-12-30
Well if you have video evidence I look forward to that being submitted in their next court filing 👀🍿
1 RedPillDessert 2020-12-30
I'd post it here, but I'm wary that Reddit will censor me or worse (articles of elecSion fraud are banned, not sure about videos directly). The video is on the you-know-where win site though with the title beginning: "7 min Video from GA hearing today includes".
To be clear, I'm not sure the aforementioned video is proving anything - I was just using it as an example where if there WERE fraud going on, it would have to taken up after the crime was committed. It seems preposterous the judges wouldn't consider such cases.
1 somestupidname1 2020-12-30
It's not like the case would have gone anywhere if they had heard it.
1 jubbergun 2020-12-30
Maybe, maybe not, but it's one thing to refuse to hear the case, and another thing to hear it, with the public listening and making its own judgments, and making an actual ruling. Like I said, some of the Trump lawsuits have been r-slurred in the extreme, which is why it's curious that instead of letting Trump's legal team (and others filing these suits) make fools of themselves in full view of the public courts are going out of their way to avoid hearing these cases.
1 Babybear_Dramabear 2020-12-30
You can have standing before the election. There's tons of litigation going on in Georgia right now.
1 somestupidname1 2020-12-30
They realized they don't have receipts so are now hoping the Supreme Court can use their membership card to look through their recent transactions.