high quality twitter meltdown when some commie gets asked for a source for that claim

2  2021-01-13 by 600_lbs_of_sin

29 comments

Do you think there's ever a tiny voice in the ideologues' head saying, "hey man, you should probably just log off"?

I’ve fought that one for six years now

A true hero, that Pizzashill, I heard.

yes but it's drowned out by the other voice which says things like "THE PEOPLE I KNOW AND WHO I ASSUME TRUST ME TO NOT JUST MAKE SHIT UP, YOU FUCKS. I AM SICK OF VIRALITY UTTERLY BEYOND MY FUCKING CONTROL AND UTTERLY BEYOND MY ABILITY TO PREDICT SUBJECTING MY TWEETS, AFTER THE FACT, TO RIDICULOUS AND UNJUSTIFIABLE STANDARDS OF VERIFICATION."

I AM SICK OF VIRALITY UTTERLY BEYOND MY FUCKING CONTROL AND UTTERLY BEYOND MY ABILITY TO PREDICT SUBJECTING MY TWEETS, AFTER THE FACT, TO RIDICULOUS AND UNJUSTIFIABLE STANDARDS OF VERIFICATION.

Good morning, I hate wingcucks.

lol this is a top tier meltdown, nice find

Good lord... 5 full hours of ALL CAPS sperging

And that's on a quiet day

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

we need a 280 character version

People saying "I heard.." is how we got into this truly glorious drama smorgasbord we have now.

I heard .013% of the population is responsible for over 50% of internet drama.

Why are twitter people like this?

Twitter caused all the riots. It's psychological poison.

Elon Musk is not a rags to riches story.

I'm confused why this thing everyone already knows caused such an epic fucking meltdown.

Yeah but EMERALDS

Ask the person who wondered if "anti antifa" means fascist if being against pro life people means you're pro death and watch the tears

Hello.

You are receiving this message because you posted in defense of Donald Trump. I no longer provide individual responses on this matter. It has been my experience that Trump supporters are universally incapable of accepting verifiable truths about him and, by extension, themselves, thus rendering discussion pointless and, therefore, a waste of time.

I wish you all the best in your ongoing battle with reality.

Yours respectfully, a logical person.

Snapshots:

  1. high quality twitter meltdown when ... - archive.org, archive.today*

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Is he or she of their assigned gender or is he...the thing I'm not allowed to say?

100% traings

Preferred pronoun is the sound of a brick thru a window. Opinions are not my own. "Mildly mean and slightly revenge-conscious". Sucks dick as praxis.

Here. Someone ELSE was actually decent enough to bother doing some basic investigation of their own initiative. Now leave me alone:

Irony.

i assume by their avatar they are a trex?

everyone on twitter was born male

This almost convinced me to make a Twitter account to ask her for a source.

A teenage Elon Musk once casually walked around with emeralds in his pocket.

once

lmao