Rofl at all the MSM articles trying to explain how frozen wind turbines aren't to blame for what's happening in TX
1 2021-02-18 by UpvoteIfYouDare
I literally just want to know what percentage of total wind power generation was lost because of inadequate weather-proofing. These fucking morons are so eager to try to control the narrative that they are getting in the way of inquiry into how to improve Texas wind power generation.
The MSM is so fucking stupid.
44 comments
6 Galatians_416 2021-02-18
This is agendaposting, but since I agree, I'll let it slide
There is absolutely nothing I hate more than journos
4 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
Actually, it's not. I want to know about wind turbine failure because I'm genuinely interested in how much of a difference weather-proofing could have made. These idiots are so fixated on their narrative that they impede honest inquiry. The same happens when trying to look up subjects that rightoid media has been crowing about recently. American media is just that stupid, except only the MSM is trying to market itself as representing the views of a wider swath of the country, so they're an easier target.
2 Galatians_416 2021-02-18
It seems the freezing weather fucked up all energy sources, not just the turbines https://www.bbc.com/news/world-56085733
If texas wasn't retarded and wasn't the only state to have its own seperate power grid, other states could've probably bailed it out of this situation lol
3 The_White_Light 2021-02-18
nice.
-2 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
Jesus Christ, you're even doing it.
I know that cold weather fucked up energy sources across the board. I want to know about wind power specifically.
3 Galatians_416 2021-02-18
Bruh idk what to tell u, of course if they made sure the turbines didnt freeze (idk how), the situation would be better
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
Being connected to the energy grids of neighboring states that were also dealing with winter storms would not have saved Texas. The overwhelming cause of this is a lack of winter infrastructure.
I want to know about the turbines because that is a far easier metric to gather, considering one can literally just count the number of operational turbines.
5 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2021-02-18
Actually, it does work that way because federal regulations of electric grids only applies to the ones that cross state lines (and ERCOT is entirely contained within Texas). Had they been connected to one of the two main electric grids in the country they would have had to follow rules about weather proofing their power stations and what not.
So yes, had a system that was literally designed to avoid federal regulators not been used, this probably would not be a problem.
-1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
That's not the same argument. Having better infrastructure would have helped much more than drawing on power from neighboring states. What specific federal regulations would have compelled them to implement sufficient weather-proofing? I doubt federal regulation would have been near enough. The key issue is that Texas has not faced weather like this in a very long time, well before the development of much of its current infrastructure.
4 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2021-02-18
They were faced with weather just like this 10 years ago and were warned it could happen again in fact, but ERCOT didn’t do anything about it
4 million people without power just like this time.
1 [deleted] 2021-02-18
[deleted]
-1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
No, that storm was not nearly as wide-ranging as this one.
1 AntiLuke 2021-02-18
Not as wide ranging, but still exposed the unaddressed weakness.
2 Galatians_416 2021-02-18
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/frozen-wind-turbines-texas-power-outages-b1802596.html
So about 48% lost bc of bad weather-proofing, is that what you wanted to know about ?
3 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
Yes lol. That's actually more than I thought. I figured maybe 25% at most was lost.
2 Galatians_416 2021-02-18
It seems they never thought this scenario would've ever happened
3 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
I've lived in Texas for a little under 30 years and this is, by far, the worst winter storm I've ever witnessed. The closest I remember was a storm back in 2014 that knocked power out in a couple areas for a night.
For a state that has not really dealt with something of this magnitude for decades, and with a technology that has only really gained momentum over the past decade, it's somewhat understandable.
3 Galatians_416 2021-02-18
Ok boomer
0 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
Tbf I've only lived outside of Texas for maybe 4 years of my life in terms of total time.
1 Arachnotron69 2021-02-18
Yeah, you went to college out of state at the same time an ice storm knocked out the power of 20% of the state ten years ago. Same areas were affected too.
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
The 2011 storms did not hit the entire state with such severity. The only way shit gets done about stuff like this is when a large majority of the constituency is affected. I.e., you have to light a fire under a lot of asses to renovate the infrastructure across an area as big as Texas to cover an edge case. This is probably a big enough fire.
1 [deleted] 2021-02-18
[deleted]
1 WeWuzKANG5 2021-02-18
Wind turbines run fine worldwide in Arctic temperatures, wonder what happened to the ones in Texas...
1 adminsare55IQ 2021-02-18
There have been articles about this exact thing.
Basically, wind turbines had little to nothing to do with it and other power sources failed in even more extreme ways:
If anything the media is to blame for pushing the bullshit narrative about "frozen turbines."
The reason people are firing back in relation to the turbines is because almost right away a bunch of poorly educated conservative grifters started trying to blame wind turbines when in reality wind turbines had almost nothing to do with it.
This isn't even getting into the fact trying to blame wind turbines for freezing is like trying to blame the roads because the government didn't salt them.
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
I know why they're "firing back". I'm tired of it and I think it makes them look stupid. The people that want to blame wind turbines are going to do so regardless.
1 adminsare55IQ 2021-02-18
You can't let rightoids spew their bullshit unchallenged.
1 Leylinus 2021-02-18
It's contrary to the agenda I've come to expect from him though, so it's radically centrism.
2 onafriday 2021-02-18
Imagine caring about poors or Texans lol
Also Houston is a shithole
1 respaaaaaj 2021-02-18
I mean the issue is that the Texan electric grid in general doesn't have a whole bunch of regulations that the national one does, including weather proofing for freak weather, like say snow in Texas. People should be pointing out that and making fun of claims that it was only wind power when natural gas and nuclear plants got fucked too, but people would rather kneejerk mock fossil fuel lovers than Texans in general for some weird reason.
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
Pretty much. Texas has a fucking stupid pseudo-privatization setup. They should stop jerking off to their moronic conception of the free market so much and just accept that a natural monopoly requires sufficient regulation and public control.
3 respaaaaaj 2021-02-18
Btw there are ways to weather proof solar and wind power production as basically every state north of Texas already does (same with other power sources). This is pure self inflicted wounds in the name of owning the libs and regulators
3 wizdumb337 2021-02-18
solar panel weatherproofing
1 Hamalama 2021-02-18
too much work, I just cover mine with trash bags whenever they are outside all day. But remember folks these panels are not meant to be left unattended for too long, they need lots of love and attention! ☀🌞☀🌞
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
No, it's self-inflicted wounds because of cost-saving measures. Do you really think the goal is to "own the libs and regulators", lol? It's about money, plain and simple.
2 pepperouchau 2021-02-18
why not both
3 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
Typically the "fuck the libs" impulse stems from said "libs" inability to comprehend the fact that stuff costs resources.
1 idio3 2021-02-18
As do lifeboats on ships, despite a fairly decent chance that they'll never end up being used at all. Nonetheless - they're still put on them for some reason...
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
Did you reply to the wrong comment?
1 idio3 2021-02-18
I don't think so?..
Well... lifeboats cost resources too, right? I don't want to take the side of libs on pretty much anything, if I can help it, but in this case - the resource argument is a bit ridiculous...
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
I was speaking much more generally.
1 adminsare55IQ 2021-02-18
You know what else also consumes a lot of resources?
1 Tobyghisa 2021-02-18
If anyone ever doubts that a lot of americans are dumb on economic matters, remember that someone downvoted the comment above
2 UpvoteIfYouDare 2021-02-18
No, I think they're downvoting because I'm a contrarian pain-in-the-ass.
2 Galatians_416 2021-02-18
They don't dare