The funniest thing about a slut shaming complaint imo is that it doesn't even deny that the person in question is a stinky-pussied puta, they just don't think that you should experience any social consequences from being a human petri dish. It's literally the exact opposite sentiment of FrEeDoM oF sPeEcH dOeSn'T mEaN fRoM cOnSeQuEnCeS.
I personally don't care who anyone wants to fuck, but to try and change the opinions of the people who do care rather than opting to keep quiet about your history as the neighborhood bicycle just seems absurdly unrealistic. This is the problem with the internet. Jannitor culture has taught people that you should be able to delete anything that makes you unhappy, and then they don't know how to handle it when that doesn't work in meatspace. Outside of fantasies about going back to dialup or confiscating smartphones and executing Tim Apple, I honestly think the best thing for the youth of today would be to start teaching CBT in school so that they're capable of dealing when their expectations don't match their reality.
I vaguely remember. I don't think we came to agreement. I would hate to ask but what is the jurisprudence regarding this? Pretty sure businesses/corporations have the right to remove person's from their property as they are legally individuals?
It's not something to agree or disagree on, it happened with company towns and farms that had housing for migrant workers already.
It hasn't been applied to the internet yet, but it's already been established by the Supreme Court that free speech protections can be applied to private property.
I had to look this up, and the guidance generally this is a no. Makes sense. It's like how some states have obscenity laws or how you cannot state fire in a packed theatre. Just like social media you cannot spread misinformation or hatred. I don't see it happening. And my personal opinion is speech should be just for your government, we should have rules to ensure the civil conduct of society and we already do (slander, defmation, Harassment (civil))
As pointed out, it's already the law. It just hasn't been applied to social media. Well, actually several states are in the process of doing so now, but that hasn't gone to court yet.
personal opinion
Well yeah, you're a leaf. You guys have hate speech laws and shit.
But don't worry, you can just use a Canadian social media platform!
I do respect that they try to counter thot patrol her and she essentially tells them to eat shit. (Also that guy trying to use "you showed a small bit of cleavage on cam once" as ammo is a transcendent level of pathetic).
Also Twitch is dumb enough as is, the fact they allow pseudo cam whoring/irl shit is comedy.
33 comments
11 trailerparkmalarkey 2021-03-29
The funniest thing about a slut shaming complaint imo is that it doesn't even deny that the person in question is a stinky-pussied puta, they just don't think that you should experience any social consequences from being a human petri dish. It's literally the exact opposite sentiment of FrEeDoM oF sPeEcH dOeSn'T mEaN fRoM cOnSeQuEnCeS.
I personally don't care who anyone wants to fuck, but to try and change the opinions of the people who do care rather than opting to keep quiet about your history as the neighborhood bicycle just seems absurdly unrealistic. This is the problem with the internet. Jannitor culture has taught people that you should be able to delete anything that makes you unhappy, and then they don't know how to handle it when that doesn't work in meatspace. Outside of fantasies about going back to dialup or confiscating smartphones and executing Tim Apple, I honestly think the best thing for the youth of today would be to start teaching CBT in school so that they're capable of dealing when their expectations don't match their reality.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
5 Leylinus 2021-03-29
It could all be solved very easily by imposing free speech requirements on major social media platforms.
1 __TIE_Guy 2021-03-29
There businesses. That would be asinine.
5 Leylinus 2021-03-29
American law has already done it to businesses in the past, leaf. We've been over this.
5 __TIE_Guy 2021-03-29
I vaguely remember. I don't think we came to agreement. I would hate to ask but what is the jurisprudence regarding this? Pretty sure businesses/corporations have the right to remove person's from their property as they are legally individuals?
3 Leylinus 2021-03-29
It's not something to agree or disagree on, it happened with company towns and farms that had housing for migrant workers already.
It hasn't been applied to the internet yet, but it's already been established by the Supreme Court that free speech protections can be applied to private property.
0 __TIE_Guy 2021-03-29
I had to look this up, and the guidance generally this is a no. Makes sense. It's like how some states have obscenity laws or how you cannot state fire in a packed theatre. Just like social media you cannot spread misinformation or hatred. I don't see it happening. And my personal opinion is speech should be just for your government, we should have rules to ensure the civil conduct of society and we already do (slander, defmation, Harassment (civil))
2 Leylinus 2021-03-29
I have no idea what this means.
As pointed out, it's already the law. It just hasn't been applied to social media. Well, actually several states are in the process of doing so now, but that hasn't gone to court yet.
Well yeah, you're a leaf. You guys have hate speech laws and shit.
But don't worry, you can just use a Canadian social media platform!
1 cheeZetoastee 2021-03-29
parklife
7 ShitTornadoToOz 2021-03-29
"A coomer and his money are soon departed"
I respect the hustle. As long as coomers and simps keep giving these girls an audience then they'll always exist.
7 Leylinus 2021-03-29
Agree 100%. Though I also believe that people that pay for shit like only fans should not qualify as thinking humans with rights.
Porn is free, if you're going to pay for something you may as well just rent some actual pussy.
5 ShitTornadoToOz 2021-03-29
Yup, if you're willing to waste your money on e-thots then those girls are far more deserving of your money than you are.
4 HyperIceCube 2021-03-29
Sure but those guys shouldn’t be allowed to vote, they should lose human rights and are forbidden to own land
2 Leylinus 2021-03-29
Based.
3 SnappyIsMyWaifu 2021-03-29
Almost as pathetic as the people who spend money on reddit
7 Shubard75 2021-03-29
Wow, a woman being jealous of other women for getting more attention. What a rare event.
6 __TIE_Guy 2021-03-29
She does have a great point though. Twitch as a business is not gonna grow very much if all it is known for is e-thots
5 Shubard75 2021-03-29
Everyone knows sex doesn't sell
3 __TIE_Guy 2021-03-29
Great point. It depends on their revenue streams. For advertising twitch can corner the adult market.
2 lol_te_gusto 2021-03-29
Twitch should splinter off to a coomerbate clone
2 __TIE_Guy 2021-03-29
I think Onlyfans could easily overtake them. Have an adult segment and a non adult segment.
2 RecallRethuglicans 2021-03-29
Because porn is a dying business
2 __TIE_Guy 2021-03-29
Traditional porn is yes. Which is a good thing.
2 HyperIceCube 2021-03-29
I would be upset too, there’s no way you can amateur cam girl bait
1 Osterion 2021-03-29
Hard to compete as a vaguely normie woman when have thots around
3 FreeDory 2021-03-29
And now you know why its actually women who hate sluts the most.
5 busslordlowkeybussin 2021-03-29
Slut shaming accusations:
https://twitter.com/Pokket/status/1376278934023733249?s=19
https://twitter.com/itsCharleyytho/status/1376308045874135041?s=19
Big simpin and a throwback to OP's own ethottery:
https://twitter.com/diegosaurs/status/1375962463003242496?s=19
Simped:
https://twitter.com/SlaterRecordsTV/status/1376308101364785153?s=19
Another OP ethottery throwback:
https://twitter.com/MsBananasTS/status/1376523028012675073?s=19
Only hoes can call themselves hoes, leads to some whataboutposting:
https://twitter.com/rim_aj/status/1376539162099208199?s=19
Come on girl start your own platform:
https://twitter.com/krissiyells/status/1376296271980457989?s=19
The best advice:
https://twitter.com/sloppynineties/status/1375985045899513857?s=19
Wholesome:
https://twitter.com/im_trashleyyy/status/1375879669505875970?s=19
Some dweeb shows up with the rule book:
https://twitter.com/TheGuruOfFish/status/1376587054709149699?s=19
Dramaexpress still rolling:
https://twitter.com/MsBananasTS/status/1376607778362560518?s=20
Check yo privilege:
https://twitter.com/ReallyRisu/status/1376303211947102225?s=20
Internalized misogyny:
https://twitter.com/HeyMeowdy/status/1376313124366680066?s=20
Whatever this is:
https://twitter.com/bcca222/status/1376328472436514820?s=20
Dramachads know how to finish this sentence:
https://twitter.com/MsBananasTS/status/1376175994604781570?s=19
6 __TIE_Guy 2021-03-29
Yo boss great work.
1 Babybear_Dramabear 2021-03-29
There is a whole lotta gymnastics in those replies tryna justify that twitch thots are basically using sex to cultivate an audience of children.
OP thot has a point.
4 WeWuzKANG5 2021-03-29
That's some good whore bait.
4 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2021-03-29
I do respect that they try to counter thot patrol her and she essentially tells them to eat shit. (Also that guy trying to use "you showed a small bit of cleavage on cam once" as ammo is a transcendent level of pathetic).
Also Twitch is dumb enough as is, the fact they allow pseudo cam whoring/irl shit is comedy.
2 Lysis10 2021-03-29
I thought Twitchoes got told no titty shirts?
2 Spysix 2021-03-29
Lol.