Howard Zinn admitted to not caring about the truth.

1  2021-03-31 by 911roofer

41 comments

I [28F] let a college professor [87M] cum inside me twice this morning with no protection [MF]

I [28F] have been sleeping with [87M] for a few years, beginning soon after he published A Young People's History of the United States. Last night, he came over and we fooled around - just some mutual oral and a little ass play. He stayed the night, and as I awoke next to him this morning, he whispered in my ear, "I'm so fucking mad about the illegal Zionist occupation of Palestine." I'm always super horny in the mornings and my pussy was getting drenched as I rubbed his ten-inch, proletarian cock beneath the sheets until he demanded me to get on my knees. He fucked me with exuberance from behind, pumping his cock into me over and over, until he asked if he could cum inside of me...

I'm not on any form of birth control and haven't been for years, but I was too goddamn horny to say no and I craved the feeling of being bred. "Mmm, yes, baby, cum inside of me," I managed to say, and I immediately felt his cock stiffen, growing ever so slightly harder, then pulsating multiple times as he unloaded himself inside of my dripping wet pussy.

We collapsed onto the bed briefly as I let him regain his breath before having him lick my clit, all the while telling him what a good champion of the people he is. I came so fucking hard, my orgasm washing over me as I thought about him overthrowing capitalist tyranny, his hot cum still leaking out of my freshly fucked pussy. By this time, his cock is hard as a rock and ready to fuck some more. He starts to pound me in a sideways position, both of us lying down. After fucking me continuously, he begins to tell me about the Haitian revolution. I want it just as badly and tell him yes, and, once again, his 87-year-old cock erupts into my 28-year-old pussy, both of us moaning and panting as he pumps his seed into me.

We lie down next to each other for awhile, both of us in post-coital bliss. Soon, though, I have him leave so that he's not late for his first lecture of the day. I went about the rest of my morning as usual, but with the utter satisfaction of having his load in me, slowly leaking out as I considered the role of the CIA in overthrowing the democratically elected Chilean government of Salvador Allende. This wasn't the first time I've allowed him to cum in me, and it certainly won't be the last. ;)

Going back to your Zinnposting roots I see.

Someone mentioned Howard Zinn. I can't stop. Please help me.

I saw Howard Zinn at a grocery store in Los Angeles yesterday. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother him and ask him for photos or anything.

He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?”

I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued with my shopping, and I heard him chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw him trying to walk out the doors with like fifteen Milky Ways in his hands without paying.

The girl at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Sir, you need to pay for those first.” At first he kept pretending to be tired and not hear her, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter.

When she took one of the bars and started scanning it multiple times, he stopped her and told her to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me. I don’t even think that’s a word. After she scanned each bar and put them in a bag and started to say the price, he kept interrupting her by yawning really loudly.

Zinn is the exact reason behind why china will win.

You can't build a strong country when half the country hate the country.

It's more than half the country now!

The left always hated the country because of Zinn and other historical quibbles like taking too long to circumcise every male child and slavery.

Now the rightoids have learned to hate America too!

Oh no.

Anyways.

Why would I care about a strong country and why would I not hate this country?

Either way, it's also impossible to have a strong country when nearly half of your population is in a prophecy cult that thinks a TV grifter is a messiah.

It's impossible to have a strong country when large percentages of it are unaware of basic history, try to deny basic history, and ignore faults.

It’s hard to have a strong country when half of the population (maybe you included) have an IQ under 100. We used to restrict voting rights with land ownership, hoping that if you were smart enough to be a landchad you wouldn’t fuck everyone else over. Then landchads started basing their identity off slaves so fuck that. Now we’re screwed. Basically, slaveowners fucked the country and now stupid mayos can vote.

I have multiple degrees from a better school than you could dream of getting into.

I'm not a big fan of IQ, but statistically, my IQ is probably higher than yours. More confirmation of this is the fact you're a navy poor.

Tbf I graduated from one of the top 5 of one of these schools and I definitely loose IQ points as I get more drunk (aka right now) but I’m employed and don’t have time for more than one degree rn so I’ll let you have this one pizza.

It's ok, won't be long before a naval cel such as yourself gets blasted by the Chinese navy.

God I hope so

Real talk tho how do you guys feel about the chinese pumping out parity destroyers at a much faster rate than the US predicted?

Obviously I’m not allowed to speak in any official capacity. My own personal opinion, which is not the opinion of the US Navy or DoD, is that ship numbers only mean something if your equipment and training mean something. We spend money on non-lead-based paint to ensure that Sailors don’t get poisoned, they say fuck it and use the lead based paint and save money to pump out ships that still don’t have air radars that compare to SPY-1 which we invented in the fuckin 80s. They will never have the Blue Water capacity and expertise we do, will never have the Carrier power we do, but they aren’t playing by the same game we are, so idgaf about their destroyers, I’m worried about the international community’s acquiescence to their illegal claims in the South China Sea and their economic imperialism. They play by the rules we played by in the 19th century and just don’t care what people have to say because what are they going to do about it? Unless they invade Taiwan, we won’t see a kinetic war.

Yeah I mean I'm not just talking about numbers.

I mean they're producing parity-level ships at a much faster rate than the US can.

I believe even the navy was shocked at how fast they had those destroyers being produced.

Obviously they're dealing with way less political gridlock and red tape than we are, but it does raise some questions about our procurement methods in the face of country like China, which will invariably reach naval parity within the next 30 years.

Obviously the US still has a serious doctrine advantage over China as it stands, but that probably won't last forever and the US won't be able to contest China in the south China sea forever.

Not without a serious allied naval build up at least.

Yeah I really can’t say anything more to that. As far as parity, their platforms are more advanced than they were before but once again it’s an apples to oranges game because I don’t think personally that we have the same strategies in mind. And finally, on a totally separate point, how in gods name can we be outspending them in defense if they’re building ships like this. DDGs cost a billion a pop, so they’re either falsifying their defense spending (likely) or they’re building paper ships and claiming that they have advanced capability (less likely)

Well, it costs a lot more to build a ship in the US than it does in China.

they're also ripping a lot of technology off which greatly reduces prices.

It's also not like they're spending small amounts on their navy, the naval budget is over 200 billion a year already.

A big issue with US defense spending is the "every district gets something" mindset congress has, so you end up with inefficient spending patterns, a problem China doesn't really have.

A lot of the defense industry guys seem to believe the ships are the real deal, though.

I know for a fact Pizza did not go to college.

I find that hard to believe.

Do you know who you are?

Because a strong country mean a strong people. And as surprising as this might be, you are people.

Idaf about this country. I'm gonna get myself banned from reddit and go back to collecting guns and hanging out in the woods.

I'm checking out.

Enjoy being wacco'ed

Idgaf.

I wonder how it get to this part. Self-criticism is a noble trait to have, and I think people like Chomsky had some good point regarding America being in too many people's business.

How did it get to the point that a left-leaning individual is supposed to think the United States is the embodiment of all evils.

Self criticism is not noble, it's scuicidal ideation but for a state.

I don't see how being aware of our past mistake and not shying away from saying "yes that was wrong, so we will not be repeating that" is suicidal.

Because people are stupid and manichean. If the average man consider the state did bad thing they will assume the state is bad, thus weakening the nation.

This is due to our society did not properly imprint the idea of self-criticism into our general conscience.

Confucius said: "A gentleman does not promote a person because he spoke eloquently, nor does he disregard an advice due to the speaker's moral failings."

This man was promoting critical thinking long before the phrase came to be. I'm sure there are many other great thinkers who spoke of something like this.

I have been pushing the idea that America is most deserving of taking up the name of "China," rather than let it tarnished by the CCP. I propose that American youths should read Confucius at a young age, along with the Bible, to learn the two best moral systems of the world.

Confucius said: "A gentleman does not promote a person because he spoke eloquently, nor does he disregard an advice due to the speaker's moral failings."

I am not gonna take advice from someone who got mad af about the number of dancers some noble had.

I have been pushing the idea that America is most deserving of taking up the name of "China," rather than let it tarnished by the CCP. I propose that American youths should read Confucius at a young age, along with the Bible, to learn the two best moral systems of the world.

Confucianist smh. Remplace confucius by lao tseu and it would be based tho.

I am not gonna take advice from someone who got mad af about the number of dancers some noble had.

Fair enough.

Remplace confucius by lao tseu and it would be based tho.

My Basketball.

I do prefer Daodejing over the Analects, but I thought it would be better to know both. So the kids learn the Analects and the Bible first to establish an idea of rule and stuff, then learn the joy of freedom from Daodejing. Daodejing should also mesh pretty well with the small-government types.

Ok, nvmd that is a based take. If I ever take over some meme country I will make you my education minister.

SAVE US CHINA! SAVE US FROM THE GLOBOHOMOPEDO-ORANGEQTARD FASCIST ELITES!!! put us out of our misery

🙏🙏🙏

Also, just to make sure I don't post this elsewhere, here's the wikipedia discussion page for Howard Zinn's book of lies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A_People%27s_History_of_the_United_States

I didn’t read Zinn in college. I read Zinn in HIGH SCHOOL because my AP US History teacher was a self declared communist. I still am not sure how I got an A in that class, but I do know that I built my base as a dramanaught then.

That was an excellent read. I have been reading it all wrong till now.

Reason is a libertarian magazine.

Howard Zinn hated America.

I know who I trust more.

You did this already