You gotta add a depreciation factor in there for each year Carly ages and remains single.

Also do not make the mistake of thinking this is linear, OP. The function has a right fat tail.

The function has a right fat tail.

No matter how "out of his league" Carly might be Hank wouldn't bother if that wasn't the case.

Yep.

Probably throw in Heavyside step function for the wall.

Personally, I think this is a wonderful development. Any objective look at casual sex relationships will quickly demonstrate the superiority of prostitution.

This, but unironically.

Snapshots:

1. Be like Carly, ladies 💅🏻 - archive.org, archive.today*

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

This isnt icarly

Hank sounds like perfect simp material.

Hank is a LVM.

Hey, post the full thing. This seems like an interesting scenario and I want to work through it.

As soon as I read it, I immediately knew it either came out of UChicago or MIT

No but I briefly extended my post-undergrad studies at a school two stops further down the Red Line. (El Jefé's >>> Felipe's if you're ever in the Square, btw!)

I got a whole lotta love for those nerds off Kendall, though! Their party scene is actually way more lit, believe it or not

My buddy goes to University of California - hicago for undergrad and HLS for a JD. I sense that his social life massively improved at the Law School, not even kidding

That's to say: I'm sorry. Unless you're an econ major, in which case congratulations and someday I'll hate what you do on the Fed Reserve Board

Which is it?

[deleted]

Thanks!

hah i would be so bitter if i saw this on an exam. Like, can we take this a little seriously please?

Lagrangian

triggered.jpg

I should know how to do this, and I have a piece of paper proving I once knew, but I can't remember anything at all.

In an nonlinear optimisation scenario the lagrangian is just f(x) + sum {u_i* c(x)_i} where f(x) is the cost/objective function that you're minimizing and c(x) is the set of constraints (either = 0 or <= 0). Fundamentally, it's a dual of the core/primal problem, and a minimizer for lagrangian can be verified as the minimizer for the primal if it satisfies the kkt conditions.

in practice tho, u just plug ur data into excel (using the solver add in) / Python / Matlab / what ever and let it do the work for u

Oh yeah, talk dirty to me in that fancy French of yours. I definitely like the Sum of u i c, and I'm looking forward to seeing sum more tonight 👀 🍆 😍

[removed]

Linking to subreddits is not allowed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

So, this is meant to demonstrate how painful it is for an average man to get with an average girl?

I think there's at least a couple of missing variables in that equation.

Yeah,like what makes her out of Hank's league?

Now do the formula that shows, regardless of how hot Carly might be, that Hank becomes increasingly tired of her shit as time progresses.

Economists know how integrals work?

💃

FDS will salivate over this,but they're all just coping continuously.

[deleted]