Reminder that in red states now it's still perfectly legal to actually teach racism but illegal to discuss the possibility that at any time systemic racism could have ever existed in the country, whether consciously or unconsciously (ie in all cases, this covers all possible categorizations is the state of consciousness of a person's actions and is logically superfluous). It's only racism of a guy goes up and explicitly states "I am doing this because I hate black people because of their skin color" before doing the racist thing, or if a law explicitly mentions skin color. Otherwise we must accept their motivations at face value and assume good faith. Ie, in the Jim Crow South, there were actually precisely zero laws passed on the entire period that explicitly mentioned skin color. This is because the 15th amendment said you couldn't ban black people from voting, so the southern states of course were dutiful and studiously obedient of the law and never once inserted the exact phrase "black people aren't allowed to vote", in any of their laws. Good on them! Only by asserting, unprovable, cultural Marxist theories of systemic racism, or naselessly accusing the actors involved of some unstated, or else "subconscious", racial animus could you poffer such garbage. The fact that in states such as Mississippi the voter roles were usually 99% white in a state that was at points majority black, is superfluous absolutely irrelevant. It wasn't the fault of those poor Mississippians if the era that black people found such difficulty in complying with the law, and to accuse Mississippians of racism based on the inability of blacks to comply with a law that nowhere at any point explicitly mentioned their race, is itself a horrific act of racism.
And luckily these laws utterly prohibit such intellectual hogwash from poisoning the minds of our children.
On second thought, actually, they will not do the above. Instead they will entirely ignore this subject, and just say something like, black people couldn't vote under these old racist laws, good thing we've moved beyond that and no longer hate on people just because of the color of the skin like back in those days. They will just entirely skip over details like the fact that these laws actually did not mention the color of peoples skin, that way they have no need of resorting to forbidden knowledge to explain such uncomfortable facts.
The fact that, again, it's actually still perfectly legal in these states to teach racist history like the "Lost Cause" bs, such as the civil war being "about states rights", or that the Ku Klux Klan was originally established to protect poor confederate widows from ravaging bands of wild freeman (both of which I was at times taught personally by certain teachers growing up in Mississippi in the 2000s), it's also entirely irrelevant. It should remain legal for those teachers to remain in their job and have free speech, that's their right of course. But, as employees of the state, it is natural of course that they should not waste taxpayer dollars indoctrination children with muh critical race theory, and thankfully it is now illegal for them to do so, and I'm sure they will abstain utterly from any temptations on their part that they may have to discuss such concepts or corrupt children with such forbidden knowledge. They will instead continue exposing children to the vibrant tradition of free speech and difficult ideas that make our country, and the great state of Mississippi, also great, and not racist.
You are the one who believes in biological determinism, as you mentioned in an earlier comment today. Critical race theory is not biological, it is about how society reacts to people of a certain race, not about their innate nature. White people are treated well by the law and their needs are attended to obsequiously, whether this is stated explicitly or not. This is an explicit fact, if you ban reality do you honestly think kids aren't going to discover the truth? You are a rightist and a useful idiot, the fascists favorite lib. Liberal moron. There is no discrimination against white men, the fact that you're basically ripping words from the mouth of Donald Trump should cause you deep embarrassment.
You are a yellow brownist, the alliance between liberalism and fascism. Piss and shit, this is your ideology.
You are lying and you know it. These laws are extremely broad and ban teaching that racism is at all possible besides on an autisticly literal level which has never existed in reality. You are a yellow brownist friend of fascism, how good does it feel to blow on these dog whistles and get all these upvotes from fascists, liar?
TLDR: Reminder ๐ก that ๐ in 2๏ธโฃ0๏ธโฃ2๏ธโฃ1๏ธโฃ red ๐น states โข๏ธ๐บ๐ธ now ๐ฅ it's still ๐ perfectly ๐๐ฝ legal ๐๐ก to actually ๐คญ teach ๐ซ racism but ๐ illegal ๐ to discuss the possibility ๐ค that ๐ฌ at any ๐คก time ๐ systemic racism could ๐ have ๐ ever โฆ๏ธ existed in ๐ฉ the country, ๐ถ๐ฆ whether ๐ consciously or unconsciously (ie ๐ง in ๐ฑ all ๐ฏ cases, ๐ผ this covers all ๐คฉ possible ๐ฑ๐๐ฏ categorizations is the state ๐บ๐ธ of consciousness ๐ of a person's actions ๐ญ and is logically superfluous). It's only ๐จ racism of a guy ๐ฒ goes ๐๐ up ๐ซ and explicitly states โข๏ธ๐บ๐ธ "I ๐ am ๐ doing ๐ this because ๐ฆ๐จ I ๐ hate ๐คฌ๐ก black โซ people ๐ต๐ฉ because ๐ฆ๐จ of their ๐๐ skin ๐ค color" ๐ต๐จ before ๐บ doing ๐ the racist ๐ณ๐ฟโโ๏ธ๐ค thing, โ๐ or if a law ๐ explicitly mentions skin ๐คทโโ๏ธ color. ๐ต๐จ Otherwise ๐ we ๐ถ๐ฅ must ๐ซ accept ๐ their ๐ด๐ฆ motivations at face ๐ฑ value ๐ต๐ and assume good ๐ faith. ๐ซโช Ie, ๐ง in โฌ the Jim Crow South, โฌ there ๐ were ๐จ๐ฉ actually ๐๐ precisely zero ๐๐ป laws ๐จ passed on ๐น the entire ๐ฒ period ๐ฉธ that ๐ฆ๐ถ explicitly mentioned ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ skin โ๏ธ color. ๐ต๐จ This is because ๐ the 15th amendment said ๐ฃ๏ธ๐ฃ๏ธ you ๐๐ค couldn't ๐ซ ban ๐๐ซ black โซ people ๐ฌ from ๐ voting, so the southern states ๐บ๐ธ of course ๐ด were ๐ซ๐ซ dutiful and studiously obedient of the law โ๐ฎ and never ๐ once ๐ inserted the exact ๐ป phrase "black โซ people ๐ท๐คฏ aren't โ allowed ๐จ to vote", ๐ in ๐ป๐ any ๐คก of their ๐๐ laws. ๐จ Good ๐๐๐ on ๐ them! ๐ฏโโ๏ธ Only ๐ by ๐ asserting, unprovable, cultural Marxist theories of systemic racism, or naselessly accusing the actors involved ๐๐ of some ๐ unstated, or else ๐ค๐ค "subconscious", racial animus could ๐ต๐ you ๐๐ poffer such ๐๐ garbage. ๐๏ธ The fact ๐ that ๐ฉ in ๐๐ฅ states ๐บ๐ธ such ๐ฆ as Mississippi the voter roles were ๐ฒ๐ถ usually 99% white โ in ๐ a state ๐บ๐ธ that ๐ป๐ was at points ๐ majority ๐ black, โซ is superfluous absolutely ๐ irrelevant. It wasn't โ the fault ๐ฟ of those ๐ฐ poor ๐บ๐ธ Mississippians if the era that ๐๐ black โฌ people ๐ถ found ๐โณ such ๐ difficulty in ๐ complying with the law, ๐ฑ and to accuse Mississippians of racism based โ๐ on ๐ the inability of blacks to comply ๐ฝ๐จ with a law ๐ that ๐ซ๐ nowhere โ at any ๐ฆ point ๐ explicitly mentioned ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ their ๐ด๐ฆ race, โฝ๐ is itself โผ๏ธโผ๏ธ a horrific ๐ act ๐คฏ of racism. And luckily ๐ฑ๐ these ๐๐ laws ๐จ utterly prohibit such ๐ผ intellectual ๐ง hogwash from ๐ฉ poisoning the minds ๐คฏ of our ๐๐ฐ children. ๐ธ On ๐ second ๐ฅ thought, ๐ญ actually, ๐ณ๐ค they ๐ฉโ๐ป will ๐๐ฏ not ๐ฅ๐ do ๐ the above. ๐ Instead ๐ณ they ๐ will ๐โฝ entirely ๐ ignore ๐ฉ this subject, ๐ and just ๐ say ๐ something ๐ like, ๐ฉธ black โฌ people ๐ฉโ๐ฉโ๐ง couldn't โน๏ธ vote โ๏ธ under ๐ these ๐ old ๐ต racist ๐ค๐ป๐ฅ๐ถ๐พ laws, ๐จ good โ thing ๐ we've ๐ซ moved beyond ๐ that ๐ and no ๐ ๐ฝ longer ๐๐บ๐๐บ hate ๐ on ๐ฅต people ๐จ just โ because ๐๐ก of the color ๐ต๐จ of the skin ๐ค like ๐ back ๐ in ๐ those โ days. ๐ They ๐ฅ๐ฉ will ๐๐ฏ just ๐๐ entirely ๐๐ skip ๐ง๐๐ผ over ๐ณ๐๐ฆ details ๐๐ฝ like โ๏ธ the fact ๐ฝ that โ๏ธ these ๐๐ laws ๐จ actually ๐คญ did ๐ฆ not ๐ mention the color ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ of peoples ๐จโ๐จโ๐ฆโ๐ฆ๐จโ๐ง skin, ๐ค that ๐ way ๐๐ they ๐ have ๐ถ no ๐ need ๐๐ of resorting to forbidden ๐ณ knowledge ๐๐๐ to explain ๐ข such ๐ uncomfortable ๐ facts. ๐ The fact ๐ซ that, ๐ฉ๐ again, โ๐ฌ it's actually ๐ฅ still ๐ค๐๐ค๐ perfectly ๐ legal ๐ฐ๐ in ๐ these ๐ states ๐๐ to teach ๐๐ซ racist ๐ค๐ป๐ฅ๐ถ๐พ history ๐กโผ๏ธ like ๐ค๐ฏโโ๏ธ the "Lost โฐ๏ธ๐ Cause" ๐ค bs, ๐ฉ such ๐๐ as the civil war ๐ซ being ๐ฉ "about ๐ก๐ฆ states ๐๐ rights", ๐ or that ๐ the Ku ๐ฝ Klux Klan was originally ๐๐ established ๐ป to protect ๐ poor ๐ข confederate widows from ๐ฅ ravaging bands of wild ๐๐ฏ๐ฏ freeman (both ๐ก of which ๐ก I ๐ง was at times ๐ญ taught personally by ๐ป certain ๐ teachers growing ๐ฑ up ๐ in ๐๐ผ Mississippi in ๐ the 2000s), it's also โ entirely ๐ฏ irrelevant. It should ๐๐ถ remain ๐ legal ๐๐ก for ๐ง๐ those ๐๐ teachers to remain ๐ฅ in ๐๐ฆ their ๐ job ๐ง and have ๐ free ๐ speech, ๐ฌ that's ๐ธ their ๐ป right ๐๐ป of course. ๐ But, ๐ as employees ๐ท of the state, ๐๐ it is natural ๐ฟ๐ฑ of course ๐ that ๐ฆ they ๐ฝ should ๐๐ค not โ waste taxpayer ๐คฒ๐ธ dollars ๐ฐ indoctrination children ๐ with muh critical race ๐โโ๏ธ theory, ๐๐ and thankfully it is now ๐ illegal ๐ for ๐ them ๐ฏโโ๏ธ to do ๐ฏ๐ so, and I'm ๐ฑ๐ sure ๐ they ๐ฉโ๐ฉโ๐ฆโ๐ฆ will ๐ผ abstain utterly from ๐ any ๐ temptations on ๐ their ๐๐ part ใฝ that ๐ฏ๐ they ๐ฅ may ๐ have ๐ถ to discuss such ๐๐ concepts or corrupt ๐๐ children ๐ธ with such ๐ forbidden ๐ณ knowledge. ๐ They ๐ will ๐ผ instead ๐ continue โฉ exposing children ๐ง๐ง๐ฆ to the vibrant tradition of free ๐ฅฐ๐๐คฉโก speech ๐ข and difficult ๐ ideas ๐ก that ๐ฆ make ๐ our ๐ country, ๐บ๐ธ and the great ๐ฌ๐ง state ๐บ๐ธ of Mississippi, also ๐จ great, ๐ and not ๐ฅ racist. ๐ค๐ป๐ฅ๐ถ๐พ
26 comments
-37 realWaterMark 2021-06-16
Reminder that in red states now it's still perfectly legal to actually teach racism but illegal to discuss the possibility that at any time systemic racism could have ever existed in the country, whether consciously or unconsciously (ie in all cases, this covers all possible categorizations is the state of consciousness of a person's actions and is logically superfluous). It's only racism of a guy goes up and explicitly states "I am doing this because I hate black people because of their skin color" before doing the racist thing, or if a law explicitly mentions skin color. Otherwise we must accept their motivations at face value and assume good faith. Ie, in the Jim Crow South, there were actually precisely zero laws passed on the entire period that explicitly mentioned skin color. This is because the 15th amendment said you couldn't ban black people from voting, so the southern states of course were dutiful and studiously obedient of the law and never once inserted the exact phrase "black people aren't allowed to vote", in any of their laws. Good on them! Only by asserting, unprovable, cultural Marxist theories of systemic racism, or naselessly accusing the actors involved of some unstated, or else "subconscious", racial animus could you poffer such garbage. The fact that in states such as Mississippi the voter roles were usually 99% white in a state that was at points majority black, is superfluous absolutely irrelevant. It wasn't the fault of those poor Mississippians if the era that black people found such difficulty in complying with the law, and to accuse Mississippians of racism based on the inability of blacks to comply with a law that nowhere at any point explicitly mentioned their race, is itself a horrific act of racism.
And luckily these laws utterly prohibit such intellectual hogwash from poisoning the minds of our children.
On second thought, actually, they will not do the above. Instead they will entirely ignore this subject, and just say something like, black people couldn't vote under these old racist laws, good thing we've moved beyond that and no longer hate on people just because of the color of the skin like back in those days. They will just entirely skip over details like the fact that these laws actually did not mention the color of peoples skin, that way they have no need of resorting to forbidden knowledge to explain such uncomfortable facts.
The fact that, again, it's actually still perfectly legal in these states to teach racist history like the "Lost Cause" bs, such as the civil war being "about states rights", or that the Ku Klux Klan was originally established to protect poor confederate widows from ravaging bands of wild freeman (both of which I was at times taught personally by certain teachers growing up in Mississippi in the 2000s), it's also entirely irrelevant. It should remain legal for those teachers to remain in their job and have free speech, that's their right of course. But, as employees of the state, it is natural of course that they should not waste taxpayer dollars indoctrination children with muh critical race theory, and thankfully it is now illegal for them to do so, and I'm sure they will abstain utterly from any temptations on their part that they may have to discuss such concepts or corrupt children with such forbidden knowledge. They will instead continue exposing children to the vibrant tradition of free speech and difficult ideas that make our country, and the great state of Mississippi, also great, and not racist.
53 911roofer 2021-06-16
Too long. Didn't read.
32 Exotic_Ad7433 2021-06-16
You didn't miss anything, he outright lied like 15 times.
They keep trying to conflate banning racial discrimination against white kids with banning the teaching of racism.
They can't incoherently tell white kids how genetically awful they are anymore, so they're mad.
1 realWaterMark 2021-06-16
You are the one who believes in biological determinism, as you mentioned in an earlier comment today. Critical race theory is not biological, it is about how society reacts to people of a certain race, not about their innate nature. White people are treated well by the law and their needs are attended to obsequiously, whether this is stated explicitly or not. This is an explicit fact, if you ban reality do you honestly think kids aren't going to discover the truth? You are a rightist and a useful idiot, the fascists favorite lib. Liberal moron. There is no discrimination against white men, the fact that you're basically ripping words from the mouth of Donald Trump should cause you deep embarrassment.
You are a yellow brownist, the alliance between liberalism and fascism. Piss and shit, this is your ideology.
-2 Eastern_Emotion6906 2021-06-16
Some of the laws are so poorly written that the do end up ban teaching racism. They arent sending their best to state legislatures.
15 Exotic_Ad7433 2021-06-16
I've yet to see a law that bans teaching about racism.
Every time I've asked someone to show me one they copy paste a bit about banning mandatory diversity training.
1 realWaterMark 2021-06-16
You are lying and you know it. These laws are extremely broad and ban teaching that racism is at all possible besides on an autisticly literal level which has never existed in reality. You are a yellow brownist friend of fascism, how good does it feel to blow on these dog whistles and get all these upvotes from fascists, liar?
1 realWaterMark 2021-06-16
Suppress the forbidden knowledge with your downvotes!
29 Pepperglue 2021-06-16
Buddy, please...
23 Takalisky 2021-06-16
Wait a minute, this isn't snappy
23 LonesomeFvgitive 2021-06-16
TLDR: Reminder ๐ก that ๐ in 2๏ธโฃ0๏ธโฃ2๏ธโฃ1๏ธโฃ red ๐น states โข๏ธ๐บ๐ธ now ๐ฅ it's still ๐ perfectly ๐๐ฝ legal ๐๐ก to actually ๐คญ teach ๐ซ racism but ๐ illegal ๐ to discuss the possibility ๐ค that ๐ฌ at any ๐คก time ๐ systemic racism could ๐ have ๐ ever โฆ๏ธ existed in ๐ฉ the country, ๐ถ๐ฆ whether ๐ consciously or unconsciously (ie ๐ง in ๐ฑ all ๐ฏ cases, ๐ผ this covers all ๐คฉ possible ๐ฑ๐๐ฏ categorizations is the state ๐บ๐ธ of consciousness ๐ of a person's actions ๐ญ and is logically superfluous). It's only ๐จ racism of a guy ๐ฒ goes ๐๐ up ๐ซ and explicitly states โข๏ธ๐บ๐ธ "I ๐ am ๐ doing ๐ this because ๐ฆ๐จ I ๐ hate ๐คฌ๐ก black โซ people ๐ต๐ฉ because ๐ฆ๐จ of their ๐๐ skin ๐ค color" ๐ต๐จ before ๐บ doing ๐ the racist ๐ณ๐ฟโโ๏ธ๐ค thing, โ๐ or if a law ๐ explicitly mentions skin ๐คทโโ๏ธ color. ๐ต๐จ Otherwise ๐ we ๐ถ๐ฅ must ๐ซ accept ๐ their ๐ด๐ฆ motivations at face ๐ฑ value ๐ต๐ and assume good ๐ faith. ๐ซโช Ie, ๐ง in โฌ the Jim Crow South, โฌ there ๐ were ๐จ๐ฉ actually ๐๐ precisely zero ๐๐ป laws ๐จ passed on ๐น the entire ๐ฒ period ๐ฉธ that ๐ฆ๐ถ explicitly mentioned ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ skin โ๏ธ color. ๐ต๐จ This is because ๐ the 15th amendment said ๐ฃ๏ธ๐ฃ๏ธ you ๐๐ค couldn't ๐ซ ban ๐๐ซ black โซ people ๐ฌ from ๐ voting, so the southern states ๐บ๐ธ of course ๐ด were ๐ซ๐ซ dutiful and studiously obedient of the law โ๐ฎ and never ๐ once ๐ inserted the exact ๐ป phrase "black โซ people ๐ท๐คฏ aren't โ allowed ๐จ to vote", ๐ in ๐ป๐ any ๐คก of their ๐๐ laws. ๐จ Good ๐๐๐ on ๐ them! ๐ฏโโ๏ธ Only ๐ by ๐ asserting, unprovable, cultural Marxist theories of systemic racism, or naselessly accusing the actors involved ๐๐ of some ๐ unstated, or else ๐ค๐ค "subconscious", racial animus could ๐ต๐ you ๐๐ poffer such ๐๐ garbage. ๐๏ธ The fact ๐ that ๐ฉ in ๐๐ฅ states ๐บ๐ธ such ๐ฆ as Mississippi the voter roles were ๐ฒ๐ถ usually 99% white โ in ๐ a state ๐บ๐ธ that ๐ป๐ was at points ๐ majority ๐ black, โซ is superfluous absolutely ๐ irrelevant. It wasn't โ the fault ๐ฟ of those ๐ฐ poor ๐บ๐ธ Mississippians if the era that ๐๐ black โฌ people ๐ถ found ๐โณ such ๐ difficulty in ๐ complying with the law, ๐ฑ and to accuse Mississippians of racism based โ๐ on ๐ the inability of blacks to comply ๐ฝ๐จ with a law ๐ that ๐ซ๐ nowhere โ at any ๐ฆ point ๐ explicitly mentioned ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ their ๐ด๐ฆ race, โฝ๐ is itself โผ๏ธโผ๏ธ a horrific ๐ act ๐คฏ of racism. And luckily ๐ฑ๐ these ๐๐ laws ๐จ utterly prohibit such ๐ผ intellectual ๐ง hogwash from ๐ฉ poisoning the minds ๐คฏ of our ๐๐ฐ children. ๐ธ On ๐ second ๐ฅ thought, ๐ญ actually, ๐ณ๐ค they ๐ฉโ๐ป will ๐๐ฏ not ๐ฅ๐ do ๐ the above. ๐ Instead ๐ณ they ๐ will ๐โฝ entirely ๐ ignore ๐ฉ this subject, ๐ and just ๐ say ๐ something ๐ like, ๐ฉธ black โฌ people ๐ฉโ๐ฉโ๐ง couldn't โน๏ธ vote โ๏ธ under ๐ these ๐ old ๐ต racist ๐ค๐ป๐ฅ๐ถ๐พ laws, ๐จ good โ thing ๐ we've ๐ซ moved beyond ๐ that ๐ and no ๐ ๐ฝ longer ๐๐บ๐๐บ hate ๐ on ๐ฅต people ๐จ just โ because ๐๐ก of the color ๐ต๐จ of the skin ๐ค like ๐ back ๐ in ๐ those โ days. ๐ They ๐ฅ๐ฉ will ๐๐ฏ just ๐๐ entirely ๐๐ skip ๐ง๐๐ผ over ๐ณ๐๐ฆ details ๐๐ฝ like โ๏ธ the fact ๐ฝ that โ๏ธ these ๐๐ laws ๐จ actually ๐คญ did ๐ฆ not ๐ mention the color ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ of peoples ๐จโ๐จโ๐ฆโ๐ฆ๐จโ๐ง skin, ๐ค that ๐ way ๐๐ they ๐ have ๐ถ no ๐ need ๐๐ of resorting to forbidden ๐ณ knowledge ๐๐๐ to explain ๐ข such ๐ uncomfortable ๐ facts. ๐ The fact ๐ซ that, ๐ฉ๐ again, โ๐ฌ it's actually ๐ฅ still ๐ค๐๐ค๐ perfectly ๐ legal ๐ฐ๐ in ๐ these ๐ states ๐๐ to teach ๐๐ซ racist ๐ค๐ป๐ฅ๐ถ๐พ history ๐กโผ๏ธ like ๐ค๐ฏโโ๏ธ the "Lost โฐ๏ธ๐ Cause" ๐ค bs, ๐ฉ such ๐๐ as the civil war ๐ซ being ๐ฉ "about ๐ก๐ฆ states ๐๐ rights", ๐ or that ๐ the Ku ๐ฝ Klux Klan was originally ๐๐ established ๐ป to protect ๐ poor ๐ข confederate widows from ๐ฅ ravaging bands of wild ๐๐ฏ๐ฏ freeman (both ๐ก of which ๐ก I ๐ง was at times ๐ญ taught personally by ๐ป certain ๐ teachers growing ๐ฑ up ๐ in ๐๐ผ Mississippi in ๐ the 2000s), it's also โ entirely ๐ฏ irrelevant. It should ๐๐ถ remain ๐ legal ๐๐ก for ๐ง๐ those ๐๐ teachers to remain ๐ฅ in ๐๐ฆ their ๐ job ๐ง and have ๐ free ๐ speech, ๐ฌ that's ๐ธ their ๐ป right ๐๐ป of course. ๐ But, ๐ as employees ๐ท of the state, ๐๐ it is natural ๐ฟ๐ฑ of course ๐ that ๐ฆ they ๐ฝ should ๐๐ค not โ waste taxpayer ๐คฒ๐ธ dollars ๐ฐ indoctrination children ๐ with muh critical race ๐โโ๏ธ theory, ๐๐ and thankfully it is now ๐ illegal ๐ for ๐ them ๐ฏโโ๏ธ to do ๐ฏ๐ so, and I'm ๐ฑ๐ sure ๐ they ๐ฉโ๐ฉโ๐ฆโ๐ฆ will ๐ผ abstain utterly from ๐ any ๐ temptations on ๐ their ๐๐ part ใฝ that ๐ฏ๐ they ๐ฅ may ๐ have ๐ถ to discuss such ๐๐ concepts or corrupt ๐๐ children ๐ธ with such ๐ forbidden ๐ณ knowledge. ๐ They ๐ will ๐ผ instead ๐ continue โฉ exposing children ๐ง๐ง๐ฆ to the vibrant tradition of free ๐ฅฐ๐๐คฉโก speech ๐ข and difficult ๐ ideas ๐ก that ๐ฆ make ๐ our ๐ country, ๐บ๐ธ and the great ๐ฌ๐ง state ๐บ๐ธ of Mississippi, also ๐จ great, ๐ and not ๐ฅ racist. ๐ค๐ป๐ฅ๐ถ๐พ
3 BigFatGamerNuts 2021-06-16
Thanks
18 Manchu_Fist 2021-06-16
Dude bussy lol.
14 chanbr 2021-06-16
Tldr
20 MannyShannon069 2021-06-16
not even worth a tldr lol
14 PMWaffle 2021-06-16
I thought you quit for realsies
6 suckmeverydick 2021-06-16
Words words words ur gay
1 [deleted] 2021-06-16
[deleted]