NYT Outs Tucker Carlson As Anonymous Source to Many Journalists

1  2021-06-21 by HodorTheDoorHolder__

90 comments

Imagine outing a source because he hurted your fee-fees.

Day of Learn to Code when

Imagine simping for Manlet McBowtie.

I'm honestly impressed such tepid imagineposting bait was so eagerly taken.

Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.

😘 Just doing my part, sweaty!

Lmao good one, kind sir! Their probably one of the Screaming Carrot Demon's Trumpeteers too 🙃

You are painfully unfunny.

you post on d&d subs

I enjoy DnD. Do you enjoy being unfunny?

Imagine being autist enough to play dnd but not intellectual enough to play pathfinder

Pathfinder is a whole cloth rip-off of DND 3.5E for people satisfied to pretend combining a couple skills together does anything to save you from the miserably granular nightmare that is 3.5E.

This is honestly a deep cut. But I’ve been playing add 2e which I’m under the impression is similar in style to pathfinder?

That just makes you autistic.

I enjoy DnD

NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERD

[deleted]

fee-fees

Please don’t

Sometimes outing your sources can just be fun.

[removed]

how you a grownass journalist outing your own damn source

Maybe they found a better source

Direct feed from DDR. Should give him a nightly segment, would be great for their ratings.

better than tucker?

oh they are taking info directly from trump now

don’t out your sources and people complain about anonymous sources and imply its fake info

out your sources and people complain because you are a bad journo

There is no winning.

And that’s a good thing

don't out your sources

take responsibility for misinformation when sources are wrong or full of shit

Seems like a pretty easy solution. Requires integrity tho, which journos right now rarely have.

So they just did neither lmao

Ignoring the ethical arguments you just posted. These fuckers just ruined the best symbiotic relationship they had.

Tuck gives them a juicy scoop. They get clicks. Then Tucker gets to REEEE for an hour about it coming full circle. Allowing them to then report on him for that.

Day of coding when?

Lmfao you are simping for journalists.

The dramoid cuck fears the JOVRNO BVLL

[removed]

Linking to subreddits is not allowed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I see an opportunity for some bullshit blockchain startup or something to allow j*urnalists to get the scoop, let their sources remain anonymous, but still show the public "this is verified info you dipshits."

nor should there be

Deadass boyass journoass sourceass

Aiiiiight bet.

The key is to not really be a journalist in the first place but a “journalist”, ie someone who asks Biden about ice cream flavors

That could be a legit 🐝 article title.

I read through it and thought “this is really too blatant to be good satire” but then I looked at the 🐥 handle. Jesus Christ, I don’t want to live on a planet with these people anymore

[deleted]

Doing Tucker, obviously. It all makes sense now.

lamo

Somebody at the NYT art department had fun making these graphics.

The fact the New York times has become this low tier grants the same fear/joy as the heroes twerking on the ambulence. One day i will die, and fat bitches will twerk on my tombstone while the new York times records it as a celebration of americanism.

Linking to subreddits is not allowed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Fight me

Bad bot

NYT: Tucker Carlson is so terrible even we use him as a source.

Is the New York times aware of its current image issue and the use of "this man is a reliable source!" as an insult?

Lol they’re gonna have a rough time getting sources for the foreseeable future

Leaking drama to journos and then reeing about those same journos on his show? Mod him.

Well this is a twist.

IKR, the NYT is citing a Anonymous Source too.

And Michael Wolff. Didn't that guy say DDR was fucking Nikki Haley.

Got a pornhub link?

[deleted]

LOL, I didnt know Nikki Haley could fall that far. I mean she is a ricebag Christian.

It's impressive how she whited out the Indian identity even down to the name. Sorry old Indians but the new ones come with self assimilate.

I think you mean selling yourself to suck up to power. She and Bobby Jindal really self-assimilated.

Tucker is the anonymous source informing about Tucker being an anonymous source.

Wonder what anonymous sourced articles the left wing politics subs jumped onto that came from Tucker.

Probably quite a few because the implication here is that he leaked a lot of shit to undercut rivals at fox lol.

So basically tucker was the one persuading j*urnalists to write those babylon bee worthy stories about trump? lmao based

It’s over for Tuckercels

Can't cuck the Tuck. He plays both sides and always comes out on top.

Truth is, the game was rigged from the start

But some were nonetheless included in the vivid account of the West Wing’s workings, in a process Wolff describes as “allowing the reader to judge” whether the sources’ claims are true.

That guy is more of an rslur than the rslurs he expects to judge his dubious sources.

Can't cuck the Tuck.

[deleted]

Tucker Carlson is a host on Fox News and always lashes out at "the media." The NYTimes just outed him as a source for news about internal happenings within Fox News and leaked some details about DD(R) as well. This makes him a hypocrite.

Political pundit turns out to be a lying hypocrite

😲😲😲

I mean is he a hypocrite for calling the media an rslur when they do something like this when he attempts to work with them? Seems like they were just trying to prove his point.

leak "anonymous" things about daddy

Journos publish "anonymous" things for the clicks

reeee at the fat boomers glued to your screen about how mean the journos are being

repeat

Quite the grift, really

[deleted]

In the worlds of D&D, words and music are not just vibrations of air, but vocalizations with power all their own. The bard is a master of seriousposting, autism and the magic they contain. Bards say that hatespeech was spoken into existence, that the words of the pepes gave it shape, and that echoes of these primordial Power Words still resound throughout the cosmos. The music of bards is an attempt to snatch and harness those echoes, subtly woven into their reports and bans.

The greatest strength of bards is their sheer versatility. Many bards prefer to stick to the sidelines in combat, using their autism to inspire their allies with pictures of hot bussy and hinder their foes from a distance. But bards are capable of defending themselves in melee if necessary, using their magic to bolster their swords and armor. Their spells lean toward charms and illusions rather than blatantly destructive spells (i.e. spamming racial slurs and telling posters to safety check themselves). They have a wide-ranging knowledge of many subjects and a natural autism that lets them pretend to do almost anything well. Bards become masters of the talents they set their minds to perfecting.

Snapshots:

  1. NYT Outs Tucker Carlson As Anonymou... - archive.org, archive.today*

I am just a simple bot, not a moderator of this subreddit | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Blessed snappy btfoing the paywalls

Ew the heir to the fishsticks fortune?

Ladies, helpful tip💅🏾 If a man is the heir to a fishsticks fortune, his taint smells like a trout left in a dumpster in July. I can't explain it. But I've experienced it🤢🤮

Do they have any proof of this? I don't mean to simp for bowtie manlet, but it's pretty coincident that they drop a big embarrassing "truth bomb" about tucker right after he shits on them.

Amusingly, today Glenn Greenwald released a story that looks into a lawsuit against Rachel Maddow that was recently dismissed at federal court: https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1407339643784290305

In it, Maddow's/MSNBC's lawyers used the Tucker defense: this show is so wildly hyperbolic that it's obvious to viewers that it's opinion, not fact, and not news. Glenn simply points out that despite every major news outlet crowing about Tucker's/Fox's lawyers using this defense strategy, there's complete silence for Maddow, and that everyone should apply their standards consistently.

I'm stupid can someone please explain why this even matters?

It doesn't

👁️👄👁️

Qui!?

snitch

[removed]

Linking to subreddits is not allowed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

lmao hopefully this makes it onto his show or w/e that thing he does is called. Might actually watch instead of just reading people's reactions if I can remember

[removed]

Linking to subreddits is not allowed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[deleted]