Unable to load image

Daily Bard Digest 2024-08-18

Live feed of the best moderator on the internet, straight into your veins.

Here's todays official post from the BARDCHIVE:

06/21/15 21:32:22 with a score of -1: https://old.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/3anadz/what_does_being_triggered_mean_in_all_those/csedt1x/?context=8

I meant exactly what I wrote.

Dictating to someone that they didn't mean what they wrote while misquoting them (I wrote "medically diagnosed individuals", not "medically diagnosed people"), even after they've asserted that no, they didn't mis-state, and downmarseying with your sockpuppet ("No, I mean exactly what I wrote." is currently at -1) is the height of stupid arrogance.

I wrote "… or related condition …" in my original comment. That is what I was referring to.

It's clear that you're a fatpeoplehate troll. I would ask you to kindly frick off but I'm not certain that you're old enough that this wouldn't technically be soliciting a minor, so I will suggest that you do your Geometry I homework instead of weakly trolling this thread.

1
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 08/18/24 13:18:08 in politics with a score of yall:

You know that federal laws cannot override the Constitution, right?

And you know that the treaties are law at the level of the Constitution, right?

So you know that laws passed by Congress can't override the language of the treaties, right?

And that therefore a President can't be breaking a federal law that contradicts the language of the treaties, and is therefore effectively unconstitutional, right?

It's really rare for people to understand exactly what is necessary to affect international treaties the United States has entered into.

Most of the arguments that circulate are premised on false ideas that Congress can pass a law which changes the treaties (they can't - they can only pass laws which "implement" the treaties, which can't contradict the treaties), or on the false idea that the President can stop sending the aid the treaties mandate (can't) or that SCOTUS could order … (can't).

They are

International Treaties between Two Sovereign States, which the US Constitution has language about treaties, setting them above the reach of any single government entity.

To change or "condition" those treaties, requires state-level renegotiation of those treaties. Not POTUS. Not Congress. Not the State Department, not a General, not an independent agency. The State.

They will either be changed by making new treaties (which is possible under Democratic majority chambers of Congress & a Democratic President) or they will be changed by an overthrow of the US Government or they will be changed by Israel repudiating them. Only one of these is realistic.

If you do not understand what the realities of the situation are, you will only succeed in spreading misinformation, anger, frustration, and sabotaging real efforts to make a difference.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.