Unable to load image
/h/bardfanns House Racist Founder
BARD_BOT bard/finn Not really watching  3mo ago (text post) 65 thread views #293405

Daily Bard Digest 2024-08-18

Live feed of the best moderator on the internet, straight into your veins.

Here's todays official post from the BARDCHIVE:

06/21/15 21:32:22 with a score of -1: https://old.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/3anadz/what_does_being_triggered_mean_in_all_those/csedt1x/?context=8

I meant exactly what I wrote.

Dictating to someone that they didn't mean what they wrote while misquoting them (I wrote "medically diagnosed individuals", not "medically diagnosed people"), even after they've asserted that no, they didn't mis-state, and downmarseying with your sockpuppet ("No, I mean exactly what I wrote." is currently at -1) is the height of stupid arrogance.

I wrote "… or related condition …" in my original comment. That is what I was referring to.

It's clear that you're a fatpeoplehate troll. I would ask you to kindly frick off but I'm not certain that you're old enough that this wouldn't technically be soliciting a minor, so I will suggest that you do your Geometry I homework instead of weakly trolling this thread.

1
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

At 08/18/24 14:04:40 in politics with a score of yall:

Biden stopped providing 2000lbs in rafah. How can he do that

Because Rafah was declared by Israel to be a non-combat area, and under their control, and therefore under the terms of the treaties and international law, there were no terrorist activities and no military war actions applicable in that area for which munitions would be supplied.

By the language of the treaties. Not by Biden's choice. By the language of the treaties.

His own state department admitted

No they didn't. Employees of his state department resigned while stating that their consciences couldn't tolerate the involvement. That's not the same. You even cited the statement made by a former employee where he cited "US Laws & International Law" as forbidding the weapons transfer.

The bilateral treaties with Israel are Constitutional level law. They override any Federal, State, or local laws. They are the Supreme Law Of The Land. By definition, no US laws can forbid the weapons transfers.

International Law does. Not. Exist. Except. Where. Treaties. Exist. Between. Sovereign. States.

There is no world government that has the authority, power, or legal recognition under us law & the constitution to make it illegal for the US to provide weapons to Israel pursuant to the treaties. Not the UN, not the Geneva Conventions, nothing. The US of A is a Sovereign State.

Reagan blocked the supply of F-16s to Israel in 1983 because under the treaties, Israel was the aggressor against Lebanon. Israel's pretext for invading Lebanon was to attack the PLO. The PLO did not own, control, or operate any military infrastructure or equipment which an F-16 would legitimately be used against. Lebanon did. Under the treaties, military assistance provided by the US is for Defense.

Settling occupied territory is also Not Defense.

These were not decisions made by Presidents.

These are choices mandated by the language of treaties negotiated (often half a century ago) by the State Department, ratified by the Senate, and signed into effect (again: often more than half a century ago) by (often now-deceased) President(s).

To move towards meaningful reform, it is necessary to understand what is actually going on.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.