- 2
- 19
- 10
- 18
BREAKING NEWS: 🚨 Reform has announced with sadness that Nigels Dog Pebbles was put to sleep this morning after internal polling show Pebbles was starting to get as popular with members as Nigel himself. pic.twitter.com/izu3pGyVqC
— Dan 🇬🇧 (@Kingbingo_) March 8, 2025
- 20
- 80
Sadiq Khan, who is known for previously describing terror attacks in his city as 'Part and Parcel' of living there , has recently invented something called 'The right to protest' specifically for Cheeto Hitler, despite allowing the Metropolitan Police to arrest and prosecute protestors who were a bit miffed that one of his Sturmabteilung killed Sarah Everard.
"We do, in fact, have free speech in this country, which includes the right to protest.
'The Right to Protest' was not something he brought up when he made it all about himself during the Southport riots, wringing his hands about how it felt 'unsafe' to go to a mosque shortly after three white kids were butchered by a Rwandan at a dance class.
Nor was it when he arrested the organisers of a pro-Tommy Robinson protest.
Despite this track record, bongs are about the prospect of larping as an antifa supersoldier, bravely...
calling trump names on social media.
heh, sure got you in a bind now. No don't look at the guy we jailed for baring his teeth at police
Honestly tempted to go for my chance to call him a ladygarden in real life
Protesting because an imported BIPOC stabbed a schoolgirl eighty times
Protesting because trump exists
Damage and violence would just give fuel to the Deform lot over at Gbeebies and TalkshitTV.
guys we should destroy everything
no that'll make us look like we want to destroy everything.
I shall be going, I shall wear a Trump is a ladygarden T-shirt
Time for some 'Free Speech' eh? That thing JD Vance says we haven't got?
The truth they don't want to admit is we have free speech for everything but racism
oh so we don't have free speech, thanks for confirming.
This is also a lie
I flew to New York to protest Trump. I can hop on my bike to protest him in London.
oh my god someone with a job has infiltrated our unemployed marxist hugbox
You have money? Why? Shouldn't you be redistributing it to me?
do those reasons have anything to do with it
not happening
?
Anyway as usual nothing will happen and the 5 people who leave their homes for this 'massive protest' will have their phones stolen by BIPOCs and then arrested
Why do you think many people in the UK take pride in being stupid?
- 22
- 45
- 74
- 110
The leader of the Rotherham grooming gang, Banaras Hussain, has been released.
— Radio Europe (@RadioEuropes) March 7, 2025
Hussain raped 15 11-year-old girls for 10 years.
He ripped out the nails of girls who tried to escape.
The court found a total of 55 crimes.
Hussain, who served a 9-year sentence, is now walking… pic.twitter.com/ucDBf91Kzt
Banaras Hussain: Release and Controversy Surrounding Rotherham Grooming Gang Leader
The recent release of Banaras Hussain, the notorious leader of the Rotherham grooming gang, has ignited widespread outrage and concern. Hussain, who was convicted for heinous crimes including the r*pe of 15 young girls over a decade, served a nine-year prison sentence and is now free, raising serious questions about the justice system and the safety of vulnerable individuals in society.
Background of the Rotherham Grooming Scandal
The Rotherham grooming scandal, which came to light in the early 2000s, involved a network of men who exploited vulnerable young girls in the town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire. Many of the victims were as young as 11 years old and were subjected to horrific abuses, including sexual exploitation, violence, and intimidation. Hussain was a key figure in this gang, which was found to have committed a staggering total of 55 crimes, including r*pe and physical abuse.
The Crimes Committed
Hussain's crimes are particularly disturbing. Reports indicate that he not only r*ped young girls but also employed brutal tactics to maintain control over them. In one shocking instance, he ripped out the nails of girls who attempted to escape his clutches. This level of cruelty underscores the severity of his offenses and the psychological trauma inflicted upon the victims, many of whom have struggled with the long-lasting effects of their abuse.
Legal Proceedings and Sentencing
The legal proceedings surrounding Hussain and the Rotherham grooming gang were complex and drawn out. Ultimately, Hussain was sentenced to nine years in prison, a decision that many have criticized as insufficient given the gravity of his crimes. The release of such a dangerous individual has prompted public outcry and calls for reforms in the judicial system to better protect potential victims and ensure that perpetrators of such heinous acts face appropriate consequences.
Public Reaction and Concerns
The news of Hussain's release has sparked a heated debate within the community and across the nation. Many are expressing fears that his freedom poses a risk to the safety of young girls and that the justice system has failed to adequately address the needs of the victims. Social media platforms have been flooded with discussions, with users sharing their outrage and calling for increased vigilance and action against grooming gangs.
Moving Forward: The Need for Reform
As the community grapples with the implications of Hussain's release, there is a growing demand for comprehensive reforms in how grooming cases are handled. Advocates emphasize the importance of ensuring that victims receive the support they need, while also demanding stricter sentences for perpetrators of sexual violence. The case also highlights the necessity of greater awareness and education surrounding grooming and exploitation, equipping individuals to recognize the warning signs and take action.
In conclusion, Banaras Hussain's release is a pivotal moment that has reignited discussions about child safety, justice, and the treatment of victims in cases of grooming and sexual exploitation. As the fallout continues, it is crucial for society to confront these challenges head-on and work towards a safer future for all children.
- 3
- 9
- 143
- 131
JD Vance slammed the UK as "some random country that hasn't fought a war in 30 years"
JD 'say thank you' Vance has gone for the extremely feminine tactic of 'literally who'ing the country that gave him his language, ethnicity, land and culture
I'm sure this ing is not on behalf of his poojeta wife
Despite Vance's comment, the UK has been involved in several military interventions around the world since 1980, and some of the most brutal have been with the US.
As usual the UK sub lets the curryfricker live in their heads rent free
Deliberate antagonism. He's trying to escalate tensions. He's a dangerous fricker.
Didn't Two Tier just 'antagonize' Trump? Well, only if you count begging him for more gibs as antagonistic
Christ, we literally fought in America's two biggest wars in that time period. For them.
but we fought your wars for you!
No refunds
Back when we were brother in arms, UK/US forces served, fought and bled together for a common cause.
you mean the fake WMDs?
Has Vance said thank you to the UK for their military support even once?
There is a lesson here, the US is no longer a friend to the UK.
LIVE ENOCH REACTION
The line of history is long, but it bends towards Enoch Powell.
The USA hasn't won a war on its own since forever as far as I know.
heh you lost
but I would never ever ever ever ever ever never make fun of a third world country for losing to us
The Americans have really voted for some dumb fricks this time.
Russians were paying random influencers millions, wonder what his payout is.
'rational and well-educated' liberals don't believe in lurid conspiracy theories the second your own failures need to be explained challenge [IMPOSSIBLE]
Neighbor the call is coming from inside the house
Did you know that hamsters can store food in their cheek pouches?
- 5
- 11
Muslim man harasses a woman on a London bus for eating her lunch while he is ‘fasting’ during Ramadan.
— Dr. Maalouf (@realMaalouf) March 1, 2025
“I can smell that. Do you mind eating that somewhere else? I’m fasting!” pic.twitter.com/mgc66tzE4L
- BernieSanders : That thing is Millie Bobby Brown ???
- 31
- 53
- 2
- 14
- 77
- 128
Walking in Holborn, London yesterday and the streets were dirty, bin bags everywhere and overall just uncleanliness was obvious.
Why and what has caused this? Previously it was not as unclean.
Yeah, why is that?
Watch as the Eternal Labourite squirms
Council cutbacks and also people not taking responsibility for their own rubbish.
"Underfunded" "Cutbacks" "Austerity" "Tories"
I would say that dipsosable consumerism has contriubted to it.
Japan is famous for being clean and also has excessive plastic packaging on everything
how close /r/uk is to Saying It
where did all this peepeehead behaviour suddenly come from since 2021
I'm sure it has nothing to do with Camden council spending nearly 2 BILLION pounds on pension obligations
"CUTBACKS could be here", he thought. "I hate LACK OF INVESTMENT."
Haven't seen that one in a while
People are eating a lot more packaged convenience food and snacks than they used to.
Oh yeah I remember seeing that somewhere
Bins were removed due to the troubles then more after 9/11 and 7/7.
!deathtomicks as usual the perfidious hibernian is to blame
This was utterly fricking astounding. Might be the literal first time.
- 18
- 29
Giving up two doner kebabs' worth of meat a week will be enough to keep the UK within safe climate limits by the end of the next decade, as more drastic changes in behaviour can be avoided if the government takes action on greenhouse gases from energy, transport and industry, the UK's climate advisers have said.
People would need to change their behaviour in some ways, such as by eating about 260g less meat each week, but this was likely to happen gradually and in line with health trends. "We are absolutely not saying everyone needs to be vegan. But we do expect to see a shift in dietary habits," said Emily Nurse, head of net zero at the Climate Change Committee, which on Wednesday published its official advice to the government on meeting the UK's target of reaching net zero emissions by 2050.
Flights should be more expensive by the 2040s although the sector could still expand by 10% while meeting emission targets, according to the CCC. In contrast to previous advice that no airport expansion could take place without big cuts to carbon elsewhere, it was not prescriptive about where or how the expansion could occur. It did find that a frequent flyer tax would have broad public support, and called on the aviation industry to take responsibility for reducing the resulting climate impact through investments in sustainable fuels and greater efficiency.
Gas boilers will have to go, people will have to use public transport and walk and cycle more frequently, while h
There is broad public support for these moves, according to a representative citizens' panel convened by the CCC and other polling. Although rightwing politicians have criticised climate action – Reform party leader Richard Tice calls it "net stupid zero" – the public are clearly in favour, according to Emma Pinchbeck, chief executive of the CCC.
"The citizens' panel were often ahead of even our advice on some of the things they were willing to consider," she said. "They are interested and want to do their bit. The public really are proud of the UK's progress on climate action [and] we can't see any evidence that the public wants us to slow down. What the public worries about is clarity from their politicians. They really want clear messages about what [climate change] means for them and what we're going to do."
The CCC, the independent adviser to the government on the climate, set out its advice on cutting emissions from 2038 to 2042, the seventh carbon budget in a series stretching back to the Climate Change Act of 2008. Carbon dioxide and its equivalents must be cut to about a quarter of today's levels to be on track to meet the legally binding goal of net zero emissions by 2050.
Ministers will have until June next year to come up with their detailed response to the findings. Many of the actions needed – from doubling tree planting by 2030, to boosting trams, buses and trains – must be begun in this parliament. Carbon budgets are set every five years, more than a decade before their start date, to lift government eyes beyond their current parliamentary term and force them to consider long-term policy.
While the CCC warned that the UK would need to make major investments – such as a sixfold increase in the number of offshore wind farms, and a doubling of onshore turbines – at a cost of about 0.2% of GDP in the next 15 years, it made clear that all the necessary steps were within reach. Other countries have managed to introduce heat pumps, electric vehicles and home insulation, and investments made now would reap paybacks in significantly lower bills by the 2040s.
Homes will need to be much better insulated, saving money as well as carbon, the CCC said.
Pinchbeck said: "If you are an elected representative who is hostile to renewables, heat pumps, electric vehicles, and some of these measures in the economy, what our numbers say is you are also hostile to your constituents saving £700 on their energy bill and about £700 on their fuel bill."
Energy costs may rise in the short term, however, which could create problems for the current government. Key to hastening the switch from fossil fuels to clean power is to make electricity cheaper in comparison with gas.
Rather than ripping out gas boilers, they should be changed to heat pumps when they come up for replacement, at the end of their 10-15 year lifecycle, the committee found. By 2030, about 450,000 should be installed per year – the examples of Ireland and the Netherlands show that is possible, according to the CCC. The move is likely to require government intervention and support for poorer households, as are other measures such as home insulation.
Taking action now would lead to lower costs in the future, the report found. Sam Alvis, associate director at the IPPR thinktank, called on ministers to take note. "The sooner we act, the sooner we benefit. Every CCC forecast has shown the cost of action falling," he said.
Doug Parr, policy director at Greenpeace, urged the government to go further. "Ministers must be even bolder when it comes to frequent flying and excessive meat consumption. Policies that drive down emissions in these stubborn high-carbon areas will ensure we don't become overly reliant on costly and unproven technologies like e-fuels or carbon capture and storage," he said.
- 89
- 91
Competing with the entire third world, young Brits are now out of their traditional Greggs or Wetherspoons gig, fuelling a potential slump in NOS Canister sales
In October to December 2024, an estimated 14.4% of all male 16-24-year-olds were Neet, compared with 12.3% female.
Rdrama still has growth potential
Niall became Neet after getting in with the "wrong people", he says.
"At first, it just seemed like Reddit but with cat emojis," Niall says, describing the Neet community.
"But before you realise it, you're saying words like 'Bussy' and 'dramapilled' - it alienates you from people."
"So obviously I had to get off all that stuff."
Seethe
can you blame them? whats the point of working, theres no light at the end of the tunnel.
It's literally easier to just say you have long covid and rake in the bennies
Yeah except 1/3rd of the country
"I'm sorry chancellor, but the economy won't budge. Our labour productivity is still 24% lower than pre-2008 trends.
"Why don't we try importing another 2 million people?"
Also at the idea that Europeans aren't lazy
do you have a source?
waaahhh billionaires exist!! My mental health!
How did the bong go from conquering the world to this level of cute twinkry in 100 years?
- 8
- 30
found it https://t.co/qdOIQ3qK6w pic.twitter.com/I874U6oi18
— Tony Sneedprano 🤟🇮🇹🥩🍝🍕🤌🦆🐎🍳🥃🤟 (@TonySneedprano) February 26, 2025
- 3
- 36
- 30
- 73
when is this fricking piece of bacon going to start wearing a condom
And I suppose I'm going to have to pay for the bastard child
no wonder this r-slur can't say 'dinosaur' properly and this SLUT is pumping out another one? On the NHS no doubt
USAID sponsored bot forgot which prime minster fricked the pig
- 97
- 83
- 1
- 11
- 26
- 32
The tesco beef brisket, although it is slop, is by far the most budget friendly meal for people trying to gain weight fast and somewhat healthily.
[[Note that this is ONLY when this item is reduced in price, for the full price of £5.15 it is by no means worth it.]]
As seen, half of the packet contains 48.9g of protein, nearly 100g for the entire thing easily eaten by one person, as well as being 672 calories total, leaving room to fit in other calorie dense foods containing more nutritious value.
Granted this means it also includes 50% of your daily saturated fats and 30% of salt, but who gives a shit about that? The big draw is that this when double yellow stickered down to its minimum price is £1.90. This is less than some of their sandwiches at full price. And, therefore, makes this in my eyes the best deal that can be found in the store.
Whether or not it tastes like boot leather is yet to be decided, I will report once heated up.