https://old.reddit.com/r/rehabroom/comments/1f7upuk/all_my_inkwell_highschool_friends_turned_gay/
/h/braincels
DEV0T10
nothing/wrong
Trans Inclusive Radical Misogynist
2mo ago
(reddit.com)
448 thread views
#297277
Inkwell finds the only way to escape the blackpill ( 
)
- 27
- 42
Top Poster of the Day:
peepeehands
Current Registered Users: 28,684
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
/h/braincels SETTINGS /h/braincels LOG /h/braincels MODS /h/braincels EXILEES /h/braincels FOLLOWERS /h/braincels BLOCKERS
Current software version: dea6a9e
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The fricking gays are fricking taking over to the fricking point where you need clear proof that someone is fricking straight
Incel communities are fricking being decimated
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Despite what so-called "academics" think, prisongay incels are a real phenomenon. Any gaming groomercord or steam group is proof of that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://incels.wiki/w/Homocel_hypothesis it's well documented
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Incel to preening twink pipeline confirmed
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/this-old-experiment-with-mice-led-to-bleak-predictions-for-humanitys-future-180954423/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Total cute twink victory
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
1% of the population is gay, the 10% is for total LGBT (including non-binary, pansexual) where women make up like 90% of it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've never heard a percentage that sounds believable tbh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
1/100 is about the rate for actual homosexuality, but it varies by location as homosexuality is not genetic but rather a result of circumstances.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Personally my circumstance was women existing and being the way they are
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How many coins are you willing to waste on this dumb joke
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It is passed in family lines but its the rare condition that is usually inherited from your gay uncle.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
and those women all have boyfriends
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Probability of a given US resident in 2021 having had a same-s*x partner is approximately 6%, regardless of s*x.
As this probability clearly includes both exclusive homosexuals, bisexuals, and heterosexuals who have "experimented", it stands to reason that non-heterosexual orientation manifests at a rate of <=6%.
Sourced from the GSS, 2008-2021, at a sample size of N=6025. It should be noted, however, that the data only comes from those who reported at least one s*x partner, so the sexual orientation rate of incels remains a mystery.
Intuition would suggest incels would be more heterosexual, but possible correlation of inceldom with higher mutational load may lead to non-standard sexual behaviors.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
These are the numbers I found
Now let's seperated by race
Anyway, it's different by country, the numbers released here were 1/100, which I will say seems more accurate.
It's very hard to find honest numbers, as even
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Graph I posted questioned, among those who've had s*x, if all of their partners have been of the opposite s*x.
In other words, the 6% lumps in both those who have experimented, are actively bisexual, or actively homosexual.
It nicely filters out fake-bisexual women, too.
As for race, self-identification would underestimate the rate of BIPOCcute twinks, while "have you fricked men" seems to somehow bypass their instincts to deny such things.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Doubt that, the numbers seem to far apart from identification. Women really do like to stretch the definition of s*x
Also, under 30s imply first one was probably conducted on a university campus. It''s like judging the rate of homosexuality in denmark based on inner copenhagen exclusively.
Do check this out
https://inequalitybyinteriordesign.wordpress.com/2019/04/12/2018-gss-update-on-the-u-s-lgb-population/
I wouldn't discount identification at all
I'm sorry to say, but numbers above 2% seem extremely circumstantial, especially since most of these surveys are conducted and compiled by pro-LGBT rights groups. For Example, the 2011 albanian religion consensus deliberately asked fewer christian neighboorhoods and made the questions weirdly phrased to make the divide seem more extreme, reporting the numbers for christians to be about 11% when the actual number is closer to 45%.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Both of us are using numbers from the GSS, I just went for activity while you used identification.
Interestingly enough, the joint-numbers for gay and bi identity are at 5% (1.7 + 3.3), which is only a percentage point away from non-heterosexual activity at 6%.
This probably means both of our numbers are accurate, however since I'm not aware of how the GSS collects its data, can neither confirm or deny if this is skewed due to college demographics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You forgot the Star of David and the pleasing waft of brimstone, sweaty.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context