"Physical attractiveness is more important for upward social mobility for men than women"

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ssqu.13320

"Unpartnered heterosexual men in the U.S. met an average of 2.4 partners for dating or s*x in the past 12 months. Unpartnered heterosexual women who were actively dating met an average of 5.1 partners in the past 12 months" https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-95540-7_6

"Physical Attractiveness is the Strongest Predictor of Initial Romantic Interest in Both Sexes; No Evidence Personality Plays Any Role, Part 2 (Olderbak, Malter, Wolf, Jones, & Figueredo, 2017)"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519305/

"Men rated poorly written essays much better when told they were written by an attractive female (F = 12.65, dj = 1/54, p < .001) (Landy et al. 1974)"

https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fh0036018

"In a study from New Zealand, women were more likely to initiate domestic violence. The rate of violence initiation was 37% for women and 21.8% for men. 18.6% of women and only 5.7% of men committed severe physical violence (Magdol et al. 1997)"

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9103736/

"Having romantic relationships in mid to late teens linked to better mental health and higher self esteem in adulthood"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6003846/

"Short males suffer from outright discrimination, which, according to research, is no less severe than gender or racial discrimination."

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3166828

"Women not only copy the mate choice of other women, but also their mate rejection. (750 female respondents)"

https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-020-00239-9

"Men hold more positive attitudes towards their female ex-partners than women do towards their male ex-partners (total N = 876) (Athenstaedt et al. 2019)"

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550619876633

"Men highest in psychopathy scored significantly higher genuineness and trust ratings compared to men lowest in psychopathy, and women high in emotionality showed more genuineness and trust of high psychopathy men"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886920305857?via%3Dihub

"Men's attraction was correlated with 12 characteristics including partner's conservatism, all Big Five dimensions except openness, anxiety, and self-esteem. For women, only two partner characteristics showed a correlation: physical attractiveness and sport activity."

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00570.x

"Women want taller men more than men want shorter women, and shorter women greatly prefer taller men (Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., & Pollet, T. V. (2013). Women want taller men more than men want shorter women. Personality and Individual Differences)"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913000020?via%3Dihub

"Socioeconomic success doesn't yet mean social or sexual acceptance for Asian American men."

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1536504218812869

"In an online sample of heterosexual women, 33% (n=118) reported purposefully misrepresenting their romantic interest in a male suitor to dine at his expense (Collisson, Howell, & Harig, 2019)"

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550619856308

"Women and their parents indicated that ambition and intelligence were more important than physical attractiveness for a long-term mate. However, both daughters (68.7%) and their parents (63.3%) chose the more attractive man as the best long-term partner for mating, regardless of his ascribed traits."

https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Febs0000325

"Participants could not be prevented from judging defendants with untrustworthy facial appearances as guilty more often, no matter how hard scientists tried."

https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/a8w2d

"Men liked 61.9% of women on Tinder and women liked a mere 4.5% of men on Tinder"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775719301104

Mentalcel ropefuel jfl

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1390257

"A husband's depression negatively affected his wife's sexual satisfaction. A wife's depression did not affect her husband's sexual satisfaction"

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0092623X.2023.2166637

"Pro-female and anti-male biases are more influential than race and a multitude of other factors in Implicit Association Tests"

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35587425/

"Damaging genetic variants reduce reproductive success substantially in males but much less so in females. Males carriers of such variants are less likely to find reproductive partners. Sexual selection can account for roughly a quarter of all purifying selection on human genes."

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.26.116111v3

"At an American university, a man's physical attractiveness significantly predicted his romantic popularity. Potential for financial success, friendliness, responsibility, trustworthiness, leadership, academic success, and parental qualities did not."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29506449/

"Beauty is objective and measurable in the brain"

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0001201

"Men face more discrimination overall in society than women"

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0205349

"Women have a greater anti-women bias in scientific peer review than men"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014292116300368?via%3Dihub

"Good looking people are less likely to be arrested or convicted"

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2019.1618750

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167291175009

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12147-015-9142-5

"Parents are more attentive and care more for daughters than sons"

https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fbne0000199

"Women partnered to low income men are more prone to infidelity"

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-012-9930-x

"Loneliness and mental health problems are rising for both genders"(lifefuel tbh)

https://friendmatch.com/blog/loneliness-a-rising-epidemic-among-the-young.html

https://time.com/5609124/us-suicide-rate-increase/

https://time.com/5550803/depression-suicide-rates-youth/

https://coachmikeblogs.com/anxiety-depression-chemical-imbalance-or-dietary-disaster/

It’s true I don’t. This is because incel violence is actually quite rare.

There are many demographic and ideological groups with higher rates of violence toward women.

Incels are risk-averse and introverted. They have high rates of anxiety and depression. They have an external… https://t.co/aKJ0Asn58t pic.twitter.com/iCEq0P50bZ

— Alexander (@datepsych) September 22, 2024

NYT article about hypergamy. They're conclusion? Women caused Donald Trump to happen by doing too well after getting rights and still demanding to marry up.

Some of my favorite bits of this unintentionally based take 🧵 pic.twitter.com/H6S6agza1K

— bone (@boneGPT) November 30, 2024

!chuds !incels turns out putting moids (non brown or red) at a massive disadvantage and transforming everything from education to work in the eternal foids favor caused men to fail out of the system left and right!

And yet women still refuse to date down

In order to succeed as a Zoomer man you have to be born at least a 6/10 and then against all odds succeed in current society enough to out earn most foids. This doesn't apply to 8/10 =< men, they get to be the modern equivalent of a model wife. And even if you "make it" with a 4/10 foid, you better hope she doesn't bare a son if she wants kids at all and there is a 60% chance she will just end up divorce raping you anyway.

Oh well, shut up and pay the tax goy.

i'm objectively pretty attractive. 6'1'', fit, facial aesthetics, and have a large number of friends. BUT, my little peepeelet is laughable. 5 inches long, and a mere 4 inches of girth. to be honest, it hasn't seemed to matter that much with girlfriends. i am enthusiastic in the sack, can muster serious stamina, and know my way around a c*nt.

YET there is nothing more i love doing than going to some barslut or tinder whore's place and revealing my pathetic pissclit. i'm sure they expected the whole package with me, so the look of defeat is palpable. it is an amazing sort of bathos that plunges them into a chasm that only a mind addled by hunger for BIGPEEPEE can appreciate.

i then frick them poorly for a hasty 5 minutes, achieve my climax, and make my leave, knowing i've done right in this world.

When women dress like strippers in public and at the gym, neuroscientists have discovered that it is a form of women raping men and children because of the way the brain is structured to react to visual stimuli. pic.twitter.com/AVQUVqhRFx

— Gender Studies for Men (@JohnDavisJDLLM) October 30, 2024

lets try it out on a few people

mcnutt:

:

dylan mulvaney:

krayon (sister toucher):

!r-slurs upload yourself and post results (dont have to include actual pic of face if ur a kitty)

!pings

Introducing the latest advancement in incel technologyhttps://t.co/FxBbuckmPU

Upload a picture and get a complete face structure analysis, try and share your result, the tool runs on your browser privately offline.

This project was funded by INCEL COIN, contract address:… pic.twitter.com/hWvPN4iX3w

— vers and lukas (podcast) (@versandlukas) April 2, 2024

'Dact's post about sexuality during the Cultural Revolution sent me down a rabbit hole and I found this

https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2024-78558-001.html

One of the authors is a professor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Edward_Ottesen_Kennair

Other is this

Selected Excerpts

In the partly autobiographical novel, Half of Malmö Consists of Guys Who Dumped Me (2021), Amanda Romare dramatizes how urban dating and technologies like Tinder exploit women's evolved mate preferences in a manner that drives addiction and dysfunction. Many women have practically unlimited access to serial dating and short-term s*x with highly attractive men, but such experiences can leave women less able to calibrate their mating strategies, thus making it harder to acquire a long-term partner.

The fact that most Western women no longer are materially or morally dependent on being in a long-term relationship motivates them to exclude the least compelling men from their pool of potential pair-bonding candidates. Gender equality and economic inequality drive women to focus their mate attraction efforts on a shrinking proportion of men. S*x differences in mate preferences empower women in short-term markets, giving them practically unlimited access to casual s*x with higher-value men. Less restrained by monogamous mating morality—and given access to larger, more accessible short-term markets through technologies like Tinder—many women can serially date the small percentage of men whom they perceive to be the most attractive. These men generally find promiscuous mating to be rewarding, but many of their female partners are often left sexually unsatisfied and with negative emotions and regret.

From 2002 to 2011–2013, the top 5% of men increased their number of s*x partners by 32%. An equivalent reduction in s*x partners occurred among the lower-value men. Norwegian studies attest to a similar stratification. A 2015 study suggested that there could be a 20:80 distribution among men on Tinder, but this might no longer be the case. In 2014, men swiped right three times as often as women did, 46% and 14%, respectively . In 2021, this discrepancy had increased to an order of magnitude: 53% versus 5% Neyt et al. found similar numbers: 62% and 4.5%. Even the dating app Hinge, designed to be more equitable, channels 41% of women's likes to the top 5% of men, while the bottom 50% receive 4%. Jonason and Thomas confirmed the highly iniquitous dynamics of online mating markets.

After Sigurd has become more socially capable and confident, he gets to pair bond with Josefin. She is an attractive woman with whom he envisions a future. But because Sigurd feels that women have deprived him of s*x until now, he does not consider it immoral to cheat on his first-ever girlfriend. He views himself as a victim of systemic discrimination and thus entitled to a form of affirmative action. To his friend Mats, Sigurd explains that men have always offered Josefin s*x, while "only now people have become interested in having s*x with me … It is so incredibly unfair that I have to stop because she is satisfied. I have to grab the opportunities I have". Sigurd is unable to convince Josefin that he deserves to have s*x with others while in a relationship with her. He reminds her that she has "had 15 boyfriends [and also] slept around" (3-4-18). Having had only three s*x partners, Sigurd feels he "cannot grow old and have had s*x with [so few]".

The post-1968 mating ideology of confluent love contributes to how Sigurd feels that an important part of self-realization is not only to be found in committed relationships but also through casual s*x. This ideology of convenience and individualistic reward promotes serial monogamy interspersed with opportunistic, short-term mating. A belief in confluent love has taken hold of Western populations during the same period as individual choice empowered women to exclude the lowest-value men from mating. Not only does this societal evolution impose existential pain on men unable to live up to cultural ideals, but also some of them respond maladaptively. Yong et al found that men with low mate value, instead of accepting that an assortative, long-term strategy is their best bet, approach mating markets with unrealistic expectations. Those men who do get into pair bond may also suffer increased psychological pressures. Strong s*x partner stratification between men makes it so that many relationships will be like that of Sigurd and Josefin, in that the woman will be the most sexually experienced. Considering men's sexual jealousy, their greater desire for partner variety, and the promiscuous ideals of confluent love, our era's mating stratification could contribute to greater friction within a relationship.

The series' creators make a case for how poor intersexual communication—as a result of men and women not understanding how the sexes face different mating challenges—contributes to breakups and singledom. Josefin becomes furious when Sigurd admits to having cheated. She refuses to sympathize with his sexual marginalization, and he doesn't care that she has suffered similar victimization as Amanda in Half of Malmö. Josefin had admitted with regard to her former boyfriends: "I find an butthole, then we break up, and then I find a new butthole. Are you an butthole?". She agreed to pair bond with Sigurd because he is not. By "butthole," she seems to mean an attractive man who mates long- and short-term at the same time. Josefin exemplifies the burden that can befall women who get to pair bond with the most sought-after mates. Men with sexual opportunity typically become more short-term oriented, which can motivate them to cheat even after having agreed to be in a closed relationship.

Josefin had not been an insing. Attractive men pair-bonded with her, but their cheating caused her to adjust the value she assigns different traits in potential partners, further upvaluing men who convincingly signal long-term commitment. She makes this point when she throws Sigurd out of her life: "The whole point of you is that you don't do things like that! If I am to have a boyfriend who fricks others, he might as well be good-looking." She seems to have accepted Sigurd as a boyfriend whom she considers to have lower mate value, as a compromise that he should understand excludes him from pursuing short-term opportunities.

With this happy, prosocial ending, the series' creators reject the validity of incel demands regarding compensation for systemic discrimination. Our evolved psychologies make it so that, in the modern West, women have far easier access to casual s*x, an advantage they use to channel a disproportionate amount of sexual opportunity to the most attractive men. Sigurd may view himself as a victim who is entitled to affirmative action, but the series creators are unwilling to entertain what it would require to achieve a more sexually egalitarian social order in the 21st century. Their ending tells marginalized men to work hard to increase their mate value so that they have a better chance of earning a monogamous relationship in the future.

Half of Malmö begins by introducing readers to Amanda's group of female friends.5 They all have the same experience of having unlimited sexual access, but mostly being involuntarily single. Her sister insists that Amanda "is a ten and that tens date in all leagues". The sister's high assessment could be meant as sympathetic encouragement, or she could be falling prey to the 'mate competition overestimation bias,' that is, how men and women tend to overestimate how attractive members of the same s*x are perceived to be. Amanda considers her mate value to be 7 on a 10-point scale, an assessment that seems more precise considering how not a single one of her dates finds her attractive enough as a long-term partner to invite her on a second date. Through the narration, Amanda expresses how she is cognizant of her copulation partners having higher mate value. She admits, "The guy in front of me with the flowing golden-brown hair and the big dark-green irises was definitely two or three leagues above mine". At no point, however, does Amanda consider that there is a difference between people's short- and long-term values. She assigns value to herself and potential partners based on how sexy they appear in the context of a first date. Given her stated goal of finding a long-term partner, Amanda assesses value, selects men, and chooses dating strategies in a dysfunctional manner.

Through giving a short-term impression, Amanda avoids the stronger competition that women face in long-term markets, as men lower their mate requirements for one-night stands. She thus gets to interact erotically with the men whom she desires the most, hoping that s*x will motivate them to meet her again so that, over time, they can realize her long-term value. What happens instead is that her high-value dates, after having had s*x with her, move on to the next woman. Research supports that Amanda's strategy is effective for short-term mating, but works counter to her long-term ambitions

Amanda's first s*x partner in the novel is a management consultant. He is the best-looking man she has seen in a long time, a Jake Gyllenhaal-lookalike with a large, pleasure-inducing peepee and a large, central apartment. Having exceptional looks and finances, he fulfills important female preferences for both short- and long-term mating. The consultant and his friend are by far the superior males in the bar. An hour after meeting them, Amanda and her friend are on their way to have s*x. None of the women are later invited for a second date.

A trope in evolutionary research used to be that women were coy and uninterested in promiscuity. We now have a more complex understanding. Bendixen et al found that the very sexiest men arouse in women an equally strong sense of attraction as sexy women arouse in men. In such instances, at least in gender-equal and sexually liberal Scandinavia, women signal their attraction even more strongly than men, suggesting that when women finally encounter a man who is able to arouse them, they are driven to seize the opportunity. However, when women encounter average men, they are less attracted than men are to average women.

After a long period of intense feelings of regret, Amanda comes to suspect that early s*x is not the best way to sell herself as a long-term partner. When she experiments with holding back s*x, she finds herself unable to compete for the most attractive men, who become less interested in giving her attention. Amanda bemoans, "Do I have to agree to immediate s*x to be allowed to have s*x?!"

Amanda continues to do what feels best in the moment. Proceptively, she approaches whom she finds to be the most attractive man in the bar, or swipes right on the small proportion of Tinder men who give the impression of fulfilling her short-term mate preferences. She thinks about lowering her standards, but the affective rewards that the most compelling men offer when they charm her on first dates, habituate Amanda to high-arousal encounters. A few of her s*x partners agree to additional dates, but only after she has taken the initiative. Romare offers a convincing portrayal of how having abundant access to sexy men shapes female expectations. One date was

too good looking … had a really big peepee, and was crazy fit. So tight muscles that you almost could not feel anything soft when you touched your fingers against his skin. I have only met one such man before, whose skin felt like cement. (pp. 48–49)

Before they have s*x, Amanda cannot help but ask if he is "a player," similar to how Josefin asked Sigurd if he was "an butthole." The date smoothly brushes aside her accusation. Amanda suspects what awaits postcoitus, but gives in to desire. The experienced high-value man is able to provide her with gratifying s*x, but has no interest in spending the full night with her; he detaches emotionally. Amanda has grown accustomed to being told to leave once the copulation is over. She reflects on how dysfunctional this is but lays the blame on men for being exploitative.

By "douches," she seems to refer to short-term oriented, attractive men who are high in Dark Triad traits. Such men are often drawn to sexual conquering, capable of making a strong first impression, and able to get their way at the expense of others. Realizing that such men are the only ones capable of eliciting her arousal and infatuation—at least on first dates—Amanda feels like she wants to die. This is an emotional low point of the book, the scene in which she understands that her psychology is to blame—not primarily the men whom she has allowed to fulfill their mate preferences. Her emotions—against which she feels powerless—draw her to men with whom exploitation is a likelier outcome than pair bonding. More average men with a long-term orientation generally do not have those traits and skills that arouse in her an immediate desire to mate. In bars, they do not show up on her radar. On Tinder, she swipes them away. As Buss wrote, female choosiness seems to make most men "invisible as viable options in women's mating minds."

Midway through the book, she decides to delete Tinder and stop dating. She has no alternative strategy, but wants the pain to stop—she just has one more man to meet, and after him, another, and so forth. She feels that her serial dating has changed her psychological makeup. Two weeks before her decision to quit, Amanda was surprised to feel similar to involuntarily celibate men:

I have never understood the incel movement. Seriously, they are so fricked up in the head. Today, though, I got this thought when a few cuties passed me in the city. Crap. Why isn't anyone fricking me? I'm walking here in the city, with a fully loaded vagina, and no one takes the chance. That's not fair. It's your fricking duty to satisfy me. Somewhere around there I understood the similarity.

Women having evolved to be the sexual selectors incentivizes men to be deceptive. For instance, 71% of men admit to having exaggerated how they feel in order to get laid. A ruthless example is how Amanda's friend was told by her date that he "had never meet anyone as wonderful as you". After s*x, he gave her half an hour to leave—and never replied to her texts. Amanda repeatedly suffers similar postcoital behaviors but never understands or adapts to the short-term strategies of the highly experienced men she dates.

The modern environment seems to trigger short-term ambitions even in lower-value men—as they witness the mating success of the most attractive men—which was the case with Sigurd.

Amanda's possible salvation comes in the form of Emil, a man whose looks make him appear to be a player, but whose insecurities seem to have contributed to him adopting a long-term orientation. Confident men can also be long-term oriented, but Romare portrays Emil in a way that suggests that his shy nervousness has hindered him from engaging in the mating behavior to which most characters in her book seem drawn. He expresses a strong interest in pair bonding with Amanda, but she is not sure whether she is capable of settling for someone who only has the exterior to which she has grown accustomed, but not the confident personality.

It is unclear whether Emil is debilitatingly insecure, or just lacks the social bravado that characterizes many promiscuous men. Amanda and her friends are so accustomed to the winners in short-term markets that they interpret other men to be anomalies. As Amanda tries to get used to Emil's low-key personality, her friend suffers a date with someone in "the worst Tinder category", meaning that he is shy and quiet.

Romare elaborates on how the demands of the modern dating format incentivize women to disregard men who are unable to trigger immediate arousal. Amanda has second thoughts after Emil declines her offer of having s*x in a public park. In bed, when he awkwardly tries to shoot his sperm in her face, she concludes that he commits "the gravest 'c*m-in-face' fail ever". He cannot give her the sexual and social peak experiences that promiscuously successful men could provide already on the first date. Instead, he offers postcoital cuddling, long-term commitment, and monogamy.

Amanda fears that she has grown addicted to "bad-boy energy," or that she is "incapable of taking care of love once she has found it," or that she and Emil are only together "because no one else wants them"

Men and women are at an alarming rate opting out of dating: 57% of single Americans report not being interested in short- or long-term mating. Over the past two decades, past-year sexual inactivity among young men rose from 19% to 31%. Another survey indicated that from 2008 to 2018, virginity among men under age 30 rose from around 8% to 27%.

Similarly, we should sympathize with the struggles of insings. Men should not evaluate the experiences of women from the perspective of male mate preferences. Understandably, average men could find it hard to sympathize when Romare accounted for the panic her mother suffered when joining Facebook Dating. In a few hours, the 58-year-old received requests from 400 to 500 men. Every minute, a new man expressed interest. For men who mostly face rejection and silence, such attention could appear utopian. The fact that Romare was unable to stop dating attractive men who only wanted s*x, without her understanding why, could be made fun of, which some have done. A Norwegian influencer expressed similar views with regard to the men she found most compelling on Tinder: "Those I find interesting are not interested in anything serious or want 'something simple' that does not challenge them in any way". She is not the only disgruntled dater who has complained publicly about today's "men," as a consequence of her inability to distinguish between "men" and "short-term-oriented, high-value men." Leigland deleted Tinder after having had to "kiss many frogs disguised as princes," by which she meant men who have s*x with more than one woman. These experiences made her "a worse, sadder, and more cynical person." Hilde Nordlund became tired of "frickboys in their forties". Bille concluded, after years of postcoital rejections, that men lack depth.

Villainizing men who suffer involuntary celibacy is not a constructive way forward. Neither is diminishing the pain felt by women who remain single because they are unable to resist the temptation of serially dating higher-value men. Both incels and insings fall victim to our evolved mate preferences. Communities that gain a deeper understanding of what these preferences are could experience better intersexual communication, which might aid men and women in finding more functional ways to mate.

A Korean man with the nickname "코하루교배프래스! (KoharuMatingPress!)" has written a "Declaration of War Against Korean Women" 💀
He is the leader of the 20,000+ member Antifeminist Discord Channel Coalition.

Surprisingly, he seems to be serious.

He announced that he will… pic.twitter.com/HCWYiF7fwT

— (cat) 페미니즘=여성인권운동 (@dvu84djp) October 21, 2024

It's not just dogs. Women will frick almost any animal that has Chad characteristics. Yes, ugly men are less attractive than animals to women. This has been scientifically proven.

• In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a nonhuman sexual stimulus would elicit a genital response in women but not in men.

• In the present study, we examined the genital and the subjective sexual arousal of women and of men to stimuli depicting human male–male, female–male, and female–female sexual interactions as well as to a stimulus depicting female and male bonobos (Pan paniscus) engaging in sexual activity

• Eighteen heterosexual women and 18 heterosexual men viewed seven sexual film stimuli, six human films and one nonhuman primate film, while measurements of genital and subjective sexual arousal were recorded.

• Women showed small increases in genital arousal to the nonhuman stimulus and large increases in genital arousal to both human male and female stimuli.

• Planned, repeated contrasts revealed that women's genital arousal to the nonhuman sexual stimulus was significantly greater than to the neutral stimulus

• Men did not show any genital arousal to the nonhuman stimulus.

• The planned contrasts showed that men did not report greater subjective arousal to the nonhuman stimulus, relative to the neutral stimulus

Source: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=f99dbe15b67312467c2918fab22319f9de983724

Women get aroused by non-human species and their own s*x. !truecels, we're mogged by chimps, dogs, raccoons, even marseys. In short, YOU JUST KNOW.

!incels reminder that if a foid is forced to be a manlet they kill themselves, when a Chad is turned into an incel he goes postal. We literally have the strongest will in society.

It's a sad morning. I can't think of anything but the numerous rejections I've faced throughout my life. Women don't find me attractive, they've told me this in uncertain terms, and I don't know why it's taken me almost 30 years to finally get the message. In this post I'll share all the rejection I remember.

2006

My first rejection was a relatively mild one. It occurred when I was in 5th grade and I thought this girl in my class was cute. She was a Black girl and she had dated a friend of mine. I bought her chocolate and she rejected it completely and would not take it from me. After that it was awkward for the rest of year because we were in the same class and she knew I had a crush on her.

2007

In the 6th grade I had a crush on another Black girl in my class. I sat next to her, and she was a somewhat bigger girl. During camp, I admitted to my friends that I had feelings for her and they told her. She made it clear that the feelings weren't reciprocal. More awkwardness ensued as I had to sit next to her for the rest of the year.

2008

In the 7th grade the girls in my class made a "Hot or Not" list. Predictably, I was on the "Not" side. The list was passed around in class so my shame could be publicized. Right here, at age 13, when an entire room of girls could unanimously agree that I'm ugly, this should have been the moment when I accept that no women would ever find me attractive. Unfortunately, I had far too much hope.

2010

In the ninth grade, I dealt with my first major rejection. I had a crush on a girl in my class. She was Indian, and she was a good friend of mine. We'd hang around together a lot and she was nice to me. I wanted to do something nice for her when I asked her out so I learned HTML and I made a website dedicated to her. I brought my PSP to school and I showed her the website which ended with me asking her out. She rejected me and it was so painful it plunged me into depression. I had never felt heartbreak like that ever.

This wouldn't be the only rejection I suffered in 2010. I was part of a cohort that had an academic scholarship, and we were taken on a camp together with students from other schools who were part of the same scholarship. At night, the girls came to our dorm and fetched some of us because they wanted to play spin the bottle. What ensued is an evening of crippling shame. Every time the bottle landed on me, the girls would look upon me with abject disgust when they realised they had to kiss me. It became a running joke that I was the ugly, unwanted creature there giving women the ick. It was made abundantly clear to me that in no way did any of the women present find me remotely attractive and in fact they were positively repulsed by me. I will never forget this night. Brutal humiliation in front of my peers.

2011

I finally got a gf! She was a short, Black girl that seemed affectionately enough. However, she was cheating on me, she ignored me, and she constantly asked me for money. I knew she was cheating on me but I turned a blind eye because I finally had a gf, but it hurt me immensely and I couldn't take it anymore. I broke up with her in 2013.

2013

There was a girl, Black, who approached me and wanted me to help her with Physics since I was good at it and she wasn't. She started coming to my Physics afterschool tutorials with me, and because she was a poorcel, I paid for her lessons. I eventually developed feelings for her and I wrote her a love letter. She turned me down. It was emotionally brutal.

2014

In university, the girls in the cafeteria would make fun of me and call me a 14-year-old because I was short. I eventually stopped going and just ate food in my room in my third year until I moved out into my own place. Even the warden of my residence called me the "short one".

2016

This is the year I tried online dating. Got no matches on any of the apps. I chatted to one girl on Fetlife but when she saw my picture she started bullying me. This was also the year I gave up and started identifying as an asexual. I wove my past into a story of "compulsory heterosexuality" forged from ideas by feminist scholars such as Adrianne Rich. "I never wanted to date girls, I had simply been socialized that way!" The cope helped to alleviate the pain but as you all know, the delusion didn't last forever and I eventually gave up the asexual label and accepted that I was an incel, but that would take years.

One good thing came out of this, which is that I joined AVEN (Asexuality Visibility and Education Network) and met Sarah who would become a close friend of mine.

2023

After years of identifying as asexual, I got back into the game. I had a collossal crush on Sarah, and I couldn't hold it in anymore. I told her about it and I got brutally rejected. I wrote about it in this post.

https://rdrama.net/post/224434/i-told-my-friend-i-have

This rejection affected me immensely, and I fell into dangerous self-harm. I even ended up spending time in the psych ward in part because of the heartbreak. I couldn't handle it.

Conclusion

These are just some of the more notable rejections I have suffered. I've felt hate from teachers, police, and random looks of disgust in public. I've had babies in public comment on how dark I am, and people are shocked I'm old enough to drive. I'm stuck in forever childhood. I am a beast, a cretin, I am Frankenstein's monster. I was born at the bottom of the totem pole in terms of race, and I have been cursed to look up at everybody for my whole life. Do you know how brutal it is to have everybody looking down on you? My life as a five foot one blackcel has been a string of bad memories and rejections, and the truth is that it's fricking awful. Moving through society is hard as a five foot one black male. The strength it takes to go outside... sometimes I don't have it.

When normies are rejected, it's usually for something that they can improve upon. "I don't like shy guys", "we're not into the same things", "I like buff guys". When incels are rejected, they are usually experiencing genuine forms of prejudice and discrimination. We are shunned because of things we cannot change - we're short, or ugly, or dark-skinned, or the wrong race.

If you failed because of those factors in any other endeavor in life, and you expressed pain and trauma, you would be completely heard and sympathized with. e.g. if you lose a job because you're too shy, well that's a geniune reason to not hire someone. If you lose a job because you're ugly, EVERYONE would understand why you're hurt and traumatized by that. Yet, for some reason, people pretend to be oblivious to the source of our pain when we explain that we're being rejected and discriminated against because of ugliness, height, and other factors we cannot change.

If you were black and you couldn't get a job no matter how much you studied, the horror of your life would be obvious to all. If you're short, and you can't get a gf no matter what you achieve in your life, there is seemingly no reason for you to be upset, according to normies.

This is the reason why I will NEVER act on my feelings for women EVER AGAIN. If you've ever been redpilled you must have heard some variation of this advice: "Rejection is nothing bro! I challenge you to get rejected by 100 girls! The more rejection you experience the easier it gets!" It's not true. Rejections beat you down more. They crush what little self-esteem you have left. Nothing good comes from rejection. It is good to avoid rejection, it is an act of self preservation.

I'd like ONE (1) single biological woman here admit that they would date a 5'1 male. Be HONEST. It's OVER and we all know it. If you're about to turn 30 and you've experienced nothing but rejection your whole life, it is highly unlikely that fate will suddenly change on my 30th birthday and I'll suddenly become a Chad. The biggest predictor of the future is past patterns, and women have made it clear that they don't want me. I accept that, I hope to accept it as maturely as possible. I don't hate women, I don't think they're bad, and I don't blame them for not being attracted to me. However, I can't deny that it hurts like heck.

Aussie Lads down bad!

A new set of hurdles are added in the relationship game.

The newly coined term is “coercive control”. Men can now be subject to the court should they be “insecure and controlling” in their relationship.

For further info check the tweet below. pic.twitter.com/Hv3c5bAYAu

— French OG (@FrenchOG3) November 7, 2024

the fate of many a self improvecel

Nah but fr acking it up at 22 is just a waste. You think Redditors will show any genuine empathy to sub 5 men? Nah.

This brainwashing we have to feel we are incomplete without a partner puts so much pressure on people. It's ridiculous!

srs doe calling yourself an incel in highschool is wild

!zoomers why are you like this?

THREAD JANNIED, USE THIS LINK

https://archived.moe/v/thread/682765936

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

you know what OP? I think I will click on your thread. What does one do with a Playstation 5 in the Year of Our Lord 2024?

Huh that's a weird first response, was something up with the OP image-

Oh. Oh no.

Put on your PPE lads, this thread is going to be a cesspit.

Oh btw the OP image does not apply to me because I'm a -3/10 truecel btw. I genuinely despise normgroids who go "uhh there really was someone for you, you just didn't notice!" It's like their soul is too shallow to comprehend that people may have different experiences in life than them.

These guys get it.

not going to bother to document this myself but there's a sideplot about cuckshit going on this whole thread

Video games are so wonderful. Even men with normie potential can end up sad and alone with Nintendo Power

oh wow, another normgroid who can't comprehend being undesirable!

These are the people who say they can't understand incels. Men who have literally push women away from them to avoid having relationships. "darn these incel neighbors are crazy, how can they be pushing women away every day like me and still think it's not their fault they're celibate?:

"just act confident bro, just be normal bro." I'm not confident and I'm not normal, pretending to be so to get relationships will only lead to relationships built on lies.

this was the last time @peepehands ever spoke to a woman face-to-face

it's called normies faking being incels to be more interesting than they really are

Because everybody's the underdog of their own story. Nobody wants to hear that somebody has it worse than them.

thank you Anon for answering my question. What do you do with a PS5 in 2024? Post about it to 4chan.

I actually am uglier than Ethan Ralph. Also stupidity is an asset in dating, women don't like intelligent men.

things like these are the worst. I like to imagine that I'm going to make it, that I really just haven't met the right girl yet. But I know too many guys (yes, in real life too) who were hurt really bad by the girl who gave them a chance.

I actually do believe personality plays a role because if Chad was spergy enough women would hate him, if Henry Cavil gets shit for playing Warhammer, what hope do the rest of us have? But yeah, normies and especially handsome men hate the thought of ever admitting they have pretty (or even just not-ugly) privilege.

best advice in the thread

________________________________________________________

Thread is still kicking, maybe I'll collect more screenshots later.