>trad cath Italian who wants to bring back Latin mass is the villain everyone wants to stop
>Nigerian cardinal who was initially winning gets Bill Clintoned by John Lithgow's schemes (he had an affair and a kid with a nun 30 years ago and they bring the nun to serve him at the conclave).
>lib Catholic cardinals are conniving sellouts
>muzzies bomb the Vatican
>the conclave elects some random Mexican from Kabul whose existence they were unaware of a few days before
>turns out the new pope is hermaphrodite (xhe has a peepee and ovaries/uterus, the previous pope offered to pay for a surgery but xhe declined), Ralph Fiennes decides to stay quiet on it
!kino !catholics what are your thoughts on this film?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@HailVictory1776 thought it was a good mystery in a good setting. @HailVictory1776 is glad the didn't decide too make the Mexican a literal because anyone who read the book who saw a movie was in production could see that being the case and it would have changed the entire point of it.
@HailVictory1776 don't think it's sacrilege or anti Catholic. @HailVictory1776 think it is a good story of what makes good leadership versus ambition and how easy it is for blind followership too make the wrong decisions. It also critiques ambition as a whole where modern society tells us it's bad too feel good about thinking of yourself as a leader and by reduction allows one too allow poor things too happen out of guilt
It's unfortunate the herm thing is getting spoiled bc that was legit shocking blue lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context