This is the third part of a series where I look at what the situation was for each faction in the Lebanese Civil War every 5 years. It's not meant to cover all the important events of the war, but just to show you how much the fortunes of a person or group could change in so little time.
It was much harder to write about the Shi'a militias as they remain somewhat mysterious. There is abundant sources in English for all the minutiae of what the Christians were up to, but most people who write in English don't know or don't care about the Shi'a. It's even more difficult since Hezbollah was so good at keeping secrets. We still don't know for sure how they were organized, who was really leading them, or how they made decisions. I've also had to greatly simplify some things that were just too complicated to explain, like how the Shi'a and Palestinians interacted. Finding photos was even harder than the research, partly because search engines suck so much these days. I had to translate my search terms into Arabic just to find anything that didn't have a Getty Images watermark.
I repeat my cavaet before that this is about Shi'a organizations, not all Shi'a people. Many of them joined other groups of all kinds: the Lebanese army, Fatah, the SSNP, the Communist Party, the South Lebanon Army. Most had nothing to do with the militias at all.
1975
While the Palestinians and Maronites were training for the impending war, the Shi'a were much less militant. They lived mostly in the Bekaa valley and the south, far from the struggles going on in Beirut. Politics was left to the feudal landowners who dominated rural society. In 1975 their political awakening was just beginning. The charismatic Iranian-born Imam Musa al-Sadr had founded a movement to demand better treatment for the poor who never benefited from all the wealth passing through Beirut. As war broke out he formed his own militia, Amal. Sadr wanted change in Lebanon, but he was not a radical like the leftist Druze leader Kamal Joumblatt. During the intense fighting of 1975-1976 Amal did some fighting against the Lebanese Forces but Sadr kept them out of the action for the most part.
Children in Akkar on their way to fill up water from a well, July 1967. source
Sadr was unique among the faction leaders. Unlike the Maronite and Palestinian warlords he didn't shake down the population in his area for protection money. He sponsored the construction of schools and hospitals in the deprived regions of the country. He was widely respected outside of his own sect as a man who truly wanted to ease the burden of all the oppressed in Lebanon, no matter their sect. Somehow he managed to maintain close relationships with both the Iranian exiles plotting to overthrow the Shah and the Shah's secret police. Iran, flush with cash from booming oil prices, sent money to help Sadr in his charitable works. If there was one person in Lebanon who had the political and military power, the foreign contacts, and the temperament to bring the warring factions together and make peace, it was Musa al-Sadr.
Musa al-Sadr hanging out with his bros, the oppressed peoples of Lebanon.
1980
By 1980 Sadr was dead. On a trip to ask Arab leaders for help during Israel's raid in 1978 he arrived in Libya and was never heard from again, undoubtedly killed by Ghaddafi. His successors Hussein el-Husseini (yes, that's his real name) and Nabih Berri were shrewd but did not have the gravitas of Sadr.
In America they anglicized their name to Berry. I think raspberries are my favorite. They're so easy to grow.
The south was in crisis. Palestinian guerillas from a dozen different factions roamed freely with heavy weapons, oppressing the Shi'a population worse than the government ever had. Their terrorist raids into Israel provoked the Israelis to bomb and shell the border areas. In 1978 a major IDF raid swept over the border area, displacing around 200,000 people. They had nowhere to go except the slums sprouting up in the south of Beirut. Amal was building up its militia but it was in no shape to take on the Palestinians.
Kataeb militia in the the Maronite village Klea on the border. There was a large Christian minority in the south living in scattered villages. They fought for both sides in large numbers.
Meanwhile huge events were happening in Iran. The Shah was overthrown and replaced by Khomeini's revolutionaries, many of whom had been associates of Musa al-Sadr. The new regime kept sending aid to Amal, but some cracks were developing in Shi'a solidarity. Many members of Amal were inspired by the Iranian Revolution and wanted to emulate it. Amal's leaders were not so hot-headed and understood that they could no more build a Shi'a theocracy in Lebanon than they could on the moon. Nabih Berri came from an entirely different world from these rural fanatics. He was well versed in modern society, even working for General Motors in Dearborn for a time. This disconnect between the secular side of Amal and the devout revolutionary side would only deepen over time.
Ayatollah Khomeini having a nice little chortle. He actually smiled but there was some kind of unwritten rule among Western journos that you could only ever show pictures of him scowling.
1985
The cracks emerging in Amal had burst open by 1985. The fanatical elements of Amal had broken away to form Hezbollah. Some Shi'a who had been fighting for Palestinian groups also joined. While Amal's patron was Syria, Hezbollah was armed and trained by Syria's ally Iran. It was an awkward situation as the two rival groups in Lebanon were supposed to get along with each other like their patrons did. Hezbollah during this period was notorious around the world for their suicide bombings. Other groups used suicide bombers, even Christian ones (the SSNP), but Hezbollah stunned the world with devastating attacks against the US Marines and French, the US Embassy, another US Embassy building, and the Israeli headquarters in Tyre. They also began taking hostages, any Westerner they could no matter how innocent they were. Syria was not pleased as it did not want to bring down the wrath of America, especially when these terrorist attacks served more to serve Iran's interests than bring victory in Lebanon.
Survivors search the ruins of the US Marine barracks where 241 men were killed by a single suicide bomber.
The Israeli invasion of 1982 was not immediately opposed by the Shi'a of the south. Some even welcomed them as liberators come to drive out the Palestinians who had been tormenting them. But instead of cultivating them as potential allies, the Israelis treated them like a conquered enemy. Tensions rose, the Israelis began assassinating local imams, and a guerilla war soon broke out with both Hezbollah and Amal fighting the occupation forces. By 1985 the Israelis were in the process of withdrawing to their "security zone", a strip of land along the border, but the war would continue.
The most important event for the Arab world in 1982: Algeria beat West Germany at the World Cup!
Amal was now the largest militia in the nation. The invasion had driven even more refugees into Beirut and, desperate for money, they were easy to recruit. Several small militias had disbanded during the Israeli occupation and now many of the survivors joined Amal. The rapid expansion of the militia made it one of the most powerful forces in Lebanon but also lead to discipline problems as men from different backgrounds with different motives were hired. Weapons and ammunition flowed in from Syria, including a lot of artillery.
When Syria made an effort to bring together all the sects to make peace in 1985 (the "Tripartite Pact"), he brought in Amal, the Druze, and the Lebanese Forces. By now the militia was not just recognized as representing the Shi'a, but as one of the most powerful factions in the nation.
A mother tries to get her children to safety as the Syrians and their allies attack the Shatila refugee camp yet again. This massacre never caught the attention of Western media because it happened bit by bit over years.
Amal had always been friendly with Assad's regime but now it had practically become an extension of it. Berri was forced to do Syria's dirty work, joining with other Syrian-dominated groups to besiege the remaining Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut (the "War of the Camps". Fighting continued on and off for years as Assad was determined to not let Fatah ever use the camps as bases again.
Civilians evacuate Shatila with the help of the Red Cross, 1987.
Despite its relationship with Syria, Amal also tried to get along with Western powers. Hezbollah's kidnappings put them in a difficult position. Amal's failure to rescue them could be interpreted as either protecting Hezbollah or, even worse for their image, that they were not really in control of the chaos in West Beirut. They used the US as a conduit to indirectly negotiate with the Israelis and try to reduce the level of violence in south Lebanon where both Amal and Hezbollah were carrying out guerilla attacks on the Israeli troops remaining in the border zone.
Terry Waite on his way to negotiate with Hezbollah for the release of the hostages. They took him hostage too. He spent 4 years in solitary.
1990
Amal was now no longer a top-tier military power on the same level as Hezbollah and the Lebanese Forces. They had suffered badly in clashes with the Druze in West Beirut ("The War of the Flag") followed by the inevitable clash with Hezbollah, the "War of Brothers". Their militia was large but bloated with troops who were inexperienced and poorly motivated. They were no match for Hezbollah's troops, who were trained intensively by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards at bases in the Bekaa Valley. The war lasted on and off into 1990 with countless temporary cease-fires. Amal put up a good fight in the beginning but Hezbollah gradually gained the upper hand. By the end of the struggle, Amal was in terrible shape. Iran could afford to pay its proxy troops far more than impoverished Syria, so many Amal fighters defected to Hezbollah. In both of these wars, Amal had to be rescued by Syrian military intervention, making them even more dependent.
Amal militiamen, 1980s. source
While Amal's military power was cut down drastically by these defeats, it remained an important player in politics. Hezbollah was hampered by its mission to spread the Iranian Revolution. Most Shi'a were not interested in Ayatollah Khomeini's strange new form of Islam. His vision may have appealed to many rural Iranians but it was less compelling to Arabs who had lived side by side with other religions for countless generations. The idea of establishing a theocratic state where 2/3 of the population weren't even in the same sect was ludicrous, and even if it had been possible most Shi'a would not have wanted it. Hezbollah won on the battlefield but still lost the vote.
Iran banned these bloody rituals done on Ashura. Hezbollah followed their lead and stopped but many Shi'a Lebanese did not.
Hezbollah's military power and the skill of Amal's envoys gave the Shi'a an important seat at Taif where the final settlement of the war was negotiated. At first glance, the agreement doesn't seem to do much for the Shi'a, but there was one important change. Power was shifted from the president to the cabinet, which needed a quorum of 2/3 of its members to do business. In practice, about 1/3 of the cabinet will represent Shi'a parties, so if they have a few allies they can effectively veto anything that the government wants to do by just not showing up.
If you google "amal" you get pages and pages of Amal Clooney. But she's kind of r-slurred so I decided to post Salma Hayek instead.
Hezbollah had a unique position after the peace agreement. Their war wasn't over yet. They still had to drive out the Israelis. While all the other militias were disarmed, Hezbollah was allowed to keep their weapons.
Epilogue
Amal and Hezbollah mended their differences and as the "Shiite Duo" they now cooperate closely. Hezbollah does the bulk of the fighting while Nabih Berri of Amal, a master at patronage and manipulation, handles the parliament. By not attending cabinet meetings they are able to block the government from doing anything they disapprove of. Unfortunately this means nothing ever gets done. The government is completely paralyzed and unable to deal with the many crises that have hit the country in recent years.
Hezbollah troops celebrating on the day of Israel's evacuation.
Hezbollah did in fact use its weapons to great effect over the next 10 years. In the late 1990s Iran began supplying them with antitank missiles. At the same time, Hezbollah managed to thoroughly infiltrate the SLA (Israel's puppet army on the border) and kill or capture key leaders. The Israelis were reduced to cowering in their bunkers. In 2000 the decision was finally made to pull the plug. Without even waiting for the day they had planned to leave, the IDF abruptly abandoned their positions and headed home. Hezbollah had won. The purpose for which it was created had been fulfilled. This would have been a great time for them to lay down their guns or integrate themselves into the national army. But of course nobody puts their guns down when they're on a winning streak. Hezbollah now has come full circle, shooting across the border into Israel and triggering devastating retaliation just like the Palestinians had when they ruled the south.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why do you know all this history, as in this specifically above all other countries and events so well?
!effortposters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He doesn't. He thinks the West Bank is part of Israel, and the strongest argument he has for it is that some political parties in Israel publicly claim to want a one-state outcome.
He's just a white pro-Palestinian activist from Portland who likes to tell stories with loose relationships to geopolitical reality.
To be clear, he doesn't want Israel to have the West Bank. The reason he argues that it's part of Israel is because he struggles to have any other evidence for an Israeli apartheid policy without redrawing maps to suit his needs.
!jidf
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm ignorant and out of my depth here - I'm confused as to what you are stating:
that he thinks West Bank is part of Isreal
But that he's pro-palestinian; aren't these two stances usually directly opposed?
"To be clear, he doesn't want Israel to have the West Bank. The reason he argues that it's part of Israel is because he struggles to have any other evidence for an apartheid policy without redrawing maps to suit his needs."
I make no claims to have knowledge on this specific issue on the Isreal-Palestine spat; the only only "expertise" I have is in how foreign Jewhaters meld their anti-semitism with their anti-isreal stances on this painfully morally complex matter. I state this because I don't grasp what is being said here.
What did you mean with this sentence.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The West Bank is split into three zones of control, Area A, Area B, and Area C. Area A is total PLO control, Area B is shared control between Israel and PLO, and Area C is total Israeli control(this is also where the settlements are). Everyone agrees that land swaps will be part of the final peace deal between Israel and Palestine due to the realities on the ground, namely Israeli settlements and that it was never meant to be a permanent border but the accusations is that Israel is trying to achieve victory through settlements. The Oslo Accord was intended to slowly transition control to exclusive PLO control but that's been backsliding for obvious reasons.
I believe what sheikh @Redactor0 is saying is that red line built to stop suicide bombers was built within the West Bank around settlements which serves to indicate Israeli intent for annexation of those settlements. The barrier itself isn't really controversial, just the areas where it deviates from the 1967 border. It's often viewed as proof of Israeli intent to force peace terms on the world by creating a reality on the ground in which Israel gets the most land with the least Palestinians.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yes, but the areas under Israeli control aren't the ones exhibiting the traits that Redactor0 leverages to declare "apartheid." The people in the settlements and on that side aren't the ones excluded from Israeli society. The people excluded are the ones on the other side, which is also not land Israel claims or exepcts.
There is no land Israel claims sovereignty over that operates on an an apartheid regime.
Redactor0's position isn't coherent even when you analyze the detailed areas and claims of the West Bank.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@Redactor0 would you say this is a fair characterization of your position
I believe that it relates to Trump's peace proposal and concerns whether a Palestinian state with that much of Area C annexed and with those security concessions would be viable or permanently dependent on Israel
The allegations of Apartheid are typically that Israel is acting arbitrarily with security checkpoints and home destruction to compel Palestinians from Area C into Areas A and B, with accusations that this is similar to the Apartheid South African bantustans.
Obviously a chief difference between Apartheid South Africa and Israel is that citizenship isn't inherently racial with many Arabs having Israeli citizenship and the absence of these measures within Israel proper which is why allegations are traditionally narrowly on the West Bank. There's also the fact that Palestinians want a separate state as stated by the internationally recognized representative of Palestinians the PLO so this is citizens of an occupying power settling within an occupied territory of another state.
The solution would be a negotiated end to the occupation and land swaps which would allow Israel to guarantee it's own security while Palestine remains an economically and politically viable state.
This is roughly the UN consensus at the moment plus or minus some rhetoric around the designation of Apartheid and characterization of Israel's actions as cynical or justified measures to maintain security so it's not an uncommon position. Obviously this entire thing would be contingent on the PLO being able to tardwrangle Palestinians and themselves into following any agreement.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah. They've got it divided up already with Israeli-controlled roads going through it, chopping the Palestinian territory up into little pieces so it can't be a viable state. This isn't a conspiracy theory or my opinion, it's what the settlers openly say they're trying to do and the Israeli government lets them.
So in the end you get a bunch of small Palestinian enclaves where they don't have the rights of Israeli citizens but they have to go into the settlements every day to work. It's a win-win for the settlers. The Palestinians have to work for them and have to stay in their bantustan the rest of the day.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
(emphasis mine)
Y'all really struggle with the is/ought distinction. Wanting is not having, and wanting does not create the same moral and ethical conditions as having.
If Palestinians want sovereignty, they will have to accept it under terms where Israel maintains its own. Displacing all Jews from Arab nations and then rejecting the UN partition came with consequences.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
or they can keep kicking israeli butt with the help of Hezbollah and Iran
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Iran will be nuked before Israel yields sovereignty.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
look im gunna have 2 ask u 2 keep ur giant dumps in the potty not in my replys 😷😷😷
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Considering the jewish chads are literally trying to send them our way that's exactly what they're doing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
His position is literally as dumb as it sounds. Parties, especially ones like Likud, advocate publicly for a "one-state solution." He uses this to argue that the West Bank is part of Israel, which he then uses to argue that treating residents of the West Bank as non-Israeli is apartheid.
He intentionally muddles the is/ought distinction between one-state advocates and the current situation. Basically, major parties in Israel think something ought to be true (one state, probably including the West Bank). Redactor0 then treats it as if it is true, shamelessly disregarding the corollaries that follow from that.
Specifically, Israeli law would require granting citizenship and full rights to West Bank residents if actually annexed to Israel. But, since there is only an ought from politicians, it's unreasonable to treat the situation as if that's actually happened. You cannot have apartheid policies towards a population that isn't within your borders, no matter how much you think they should be.
Of course, he doesn't treat his own position the same way. He probably thinks Israel shouldn't have the West Bank, but somehow his ought never transmutes into is if it means giving up a way to criticize Israel.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If it's not part of Israel then why are there settlements there? That would be a war crime.
My point is that Israelis want to have it both ways where they act like it's already part of Israel when it's good for them but they also say they're not responsible for anything bad that happens there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, that's pretty much how this work, @timothyleary. I'd go further and say that Israel encouraged these settlements to expand in order to make a two-state solution impractical.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Gosh, I wonder if there's any shared responsibility for undermining two-state solutions here, perhaps going back to invading the original two-state border in 1948 (or countless things in centuries before).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah... there is a "shared responsibility" in undermining that solution, especially when Palestinoids keep rejecting long-term peace deals. What's your point?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Palestinians activists get up in arms when any Israeli starts talking or acting like two-state approaches won't work, regardless of why. This critique is uneven, though, as Palestinians get praised for "fighting oppression" when they undermine Israeli sovereignty.
Why are invasions and terrorism okay but settlements "war crimes"?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's not part of anywhere. Palestinians have declined every partition offer to formalize a two-state setup, including the original partition proposal from the UN following WWII (which Israel ratified and then got invaded right after).
It's not a mystery why this has occurred:
The two-state proposals have all (gasp) included existence for Israel, which groups like Hamas/Hezbollah (and predecessors) fundamentally oppose in their charters.
The instability and marginalization of Palestinians has become a tool for states like Iran to leverage for assault on Israel.
Like most Palestinian activists, you seem to think:
Israel's 1948 borders bind but do not protect them
Palestine's proposed two-state borders (which they have never ratified) protect but do not bind them
That position is incoherent or at least dishonest. Palestinians do not have a right to be protected from Israeli settlements unless they agree to have borders both protect and bind them.
A border is both a demarcation of what is yours and what is not. Palestinians seem absolutely r-slurred about the latter restricting them and protecting Israel.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Israelis have done 100 times more to cause instability in Palestine. Like Netanyahu's strategy of always blocking Fatah from ever succeeding at anything.
I've always been pretty clear that all these problems would disappear if everyone just stayed on their own side of the border. Also there has to be some revision of that border because in some sectors it's way too hard for the Israelis to defend themselves like the road to Jerusalem.
Yeah, that's totally me. I was celebrating on October 7 because I love terrorism.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And then you go on to say that you're not from the camp that celebrated/whitewashed October 7, the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. !jidf
As if Israel has ever enjoyed support from a neighbor other than, marginally, Jordan? How pathetic is your cause when you resort to arguments like communists use when capitalists refuse to trade sufficiently with them? "Waaaa! The leader of Israel isn't helping us with our cause." !anticommunists
Netanyahu was also decidedly not in power in 1948, 1960, 1965, or 1973 -- all of which included invasions or terrorism within Israel by groups that think it shouldn't exist -- and universally have overlap with Palestinian militant organizations.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
People who say this shit can literally never point to more than a couple incidents.
Israel is more responsible for the instability in palestine then say, the actual terrorist organisations holding on to power through violence?
Israel is more responsible than the people who used children as suicide bombers?
Literally since day zero all the arab nations have been using the palestinians to further their anti-israel cause. Palestinians are treated like subhuman trash in basically every single arab nation lmao, the west accepts refugees and they repay it by occasionally committing acts of terrorism in the name of palestine
If anything israel is just taking advantage of the instabilities that inherently exist in any muslim society, but to claim that israel is more responsible only makes sense if you consider israel's existence something that creates instability which is on the arabs, and not on israel
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Also I'm trying as I write these to make sure I'm getting across the perspective of the people I'm writing about. I'm working on Israel next and I'll be concentrating on stuff that they cared about that nobody in Lebanon did.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah, you caught me, I really love Palestinians and think they never do anything wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Palestinian part coming up next? Also why did Ghaddafi kill Sadr
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah I'm planning to do one on the Palestinians and Lebanese Sunnis since they're so tied up together. I'm working on Israel right now. That's probably the last one since all the other players weren't in it for the whole war. Maybe I'll do a short blurb for each one.
People have been wondering about this ever since then. One theory is that he pissed off one of the pro-Libyan Palestinian leaders who had Ghaddafi do it. It's probably somehow related to tensions between Shi'a and the Palestinians in the south.
Or maybe Ghaddafi just suddenly got pissed off and did it on a whim. Dude was legit insane.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
israel is losing im afraid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You would know something about that, no? !anticommunists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're losing the PR war. I hate how lying online so brainlet normies can be angered is used a long term strategy to isolate Israel but unfortunately it might pay off in a few decades.
The whole Palestoid strategy of acting like feral r-slurs getting purposely killed and using their families as shields so they can get sorrow points for walking holding their corpses while yelling like wild animals is incredibly disgusting but even more nauseating are Westerners falling for these crocodile tears while yielding to terrorist demands.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, and I'm personally pissed off at how the left exploits the whole !lgbt community in conjunction with pro-Palestinian propaganda.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
For the !r-slurs like myself, it bears pointing out that this is an ironic reference to Israel co-opting western liberalism for their tribal war
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who do you think wrote the playbook?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I hate intersectionality so much is unreal. Like you're gay or you favor gay marriage, therefore you're OBLIGED to accept the entire leftist package as some trojan horse
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I agree about the problem, but I'd disagree with using "intersectionality" to describe that phenomenon. Intersectionality is the concept that, if you're gay and Muslim, you face more challenges in life than the sum of challenges for being just gay or just Muslim. This usually feeds back into standpoint theory (i.e., lived experience) claiming that no one who isn't exactly the same can claim to speak to the topic of living that way.
I think intersectionality is marginally true in the sense that my life would have sucked immensely more if I also grew up Muslim and not just gay -- far more than if I were just Muslim. Things break down when people fetishize being as intersectional as possible (oppression olympics) and then claim via standpoint theory that no one can discredit them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Believe it or not, I've found that throughout their history most Palestinians actually don't want their kids to be killed. Kind of like everyone else on the planet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Don't bother this site is filled with some of the most r-slurred cucks for Israel seen outside of Tel Aviv
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I didn't realize it was this bad, I thought it was all ironic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
they are losing the real war too
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lmao the shill for the inbred foreskin thieves are actually claiming the media is working against them.
Israelis are isolating themselves by killing European aid workers and assassinating western journ*lists. No one should shed tears over some dumbass Hebrews being killed lmao, the world is better off without the Pissraelis.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They flattened a bunch of houses and will be able to deny building permits to rebuild any of it. This means the majority of the Gaza strip will be settlers soon. They've made massive gains but at the expense of the holocaust card as most people now see it as them blatantly using it to get away with crimes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
was israel's plan to flatten civilian houses or to eliminate Hamas?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Flatten civilian houses. They've worked tirelessly to take Palestinian land for decades and have never once done anything to reduce Hamas' influence. The attack Hamas did on them was the perfect excuse to seize a bunch of land.
Don't tell me you believe each sides stated rhetoric lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
lol Hamas wont allow settlements in Gaza, furthermore they wouldn't be livable for the settlers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh wow more provocations that allow them to seize more land? I bet they'd really hate that.
Jesus Christ midwits are hilarious.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
how will settlers live when under constant attack by Hamas?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
how
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
failed to achieve all its proclaimed goals of eleminating Hamas for example
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's funny how this site finds the dumbest nіggers to hang laurels on because they words words words about shit they don't know about
@Redactor0 @sneedman @kaamrev etc
Basically kiwifarms at this point
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the frick did i say
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, you mostly spergpost about South Africa related stuff which you're familiarized with coupled with personal anecdotes (many of said anecdotes are much more interesting than the wikipedia/news part of the effortposts).
Still @Arran comment made me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
@Communist_spez stand with israel
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hi @Communist_spez, We're sorry to say that your comment has been automatically removed because you forgot to include the phrase
i stand with israel
. Here at our church, we strongly believe thati stand with israel
and we want to make sure that all of our members feel loved and accepted. If you'd like to resubmit your post, we would be more than happy to take a look at it. In the meantime, if you need any help or have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to us. We're always here to help. Have a blessed day!Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
K1KES MAD x24
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Don't care from the river to the sea
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I wanted to learn about SQL, GIS, etc. but I would be bored to death making a database about running a Walmart or something. So I figured I'd use Lebanon for my data since you've got people, places, organizations, etc. interacting with each other there. But as I started entering stuff in, I got more and more questions about it, and pretty soon I was spending more time researching than actually doing the stuff I was trying to learn.
Also there's a really amazing documentary where they interviewed everyone important who was still alive. These guys actually were really pretty open about what they had done in the past, something you rarely get in history. For one thing, they had amnesty so they could say whatever the wanted. And everyone had fought and been allied with everyone else at some point, so they couldn't trash each other too much without looking bad themselves.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
He's Lebanese. It's also one of the most significant events in the history of Lebanon and lasted 25 years. An entire generation of Lebanon's population knew only war so it has a big impact on the culture as well.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He's not Lebanese lol he's a yt Amerikkkan from Portland iirc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
🤢🤢🤢 knowing this much about a random war on the other side of the planet is giving major incel vibes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I feel like most drama str8s are incels though
I like redactor though, I feel like he used to live in a hippie commune or something
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh God no. I'm like Cartman, I can't stand hippies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You just give me ex-hippie turned Reagan Republikkkan turned never-Trumper vibes tbh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The silent majority himself
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
He's a fed that measures height in Starbucks lattes
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They rebuilt the US embassy according to the new guidelines, pretty intense looking
Neighbor tried to shoot it up yesterday
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I looks like part of a star fort
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
And they built it outside of Beirut, in a Christian area just to the north. In that last picture you can see downtown Beirut and the harbor in the background, where the old embassy had been. This way it's much harder to get a truck bomb anywhere near it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good luck even blowing half of that up with a truck bomb, shit's massive
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not funny. I'm not laughing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I AM
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I skipped reading it at first glance thinking it was the same post from the other day and then decided not to bother this time because that song is my only input to the discussion. Should've mixed up the title a bit for the resident midwits.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
this is the one I was waiting for, you should write up about the war of 2006 to make dramatards seethe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know if they're ready for the truth about it yet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It never happened
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's just what the gray aliens want you to believe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
At the beginning of The Troubles, many Catholics welcomed the British Army as a neutral party against the Protestants. Unfortunately, the Bongs did the exact same thing as the Israelis.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah it's a very similar situation. If the British had let Catholics have a militia to protect their neighborhoods from the Protestants then they might never have turned to the IRA for help. If the Israelis had let the Shi'a have a militia to keep the Palestinians out, it might have worked. Of course there's no guarantees that it would work but they should have at least tried.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
If you want to know why modern Lebanon is a Grade-F shithole, look to Hezbollah. The non-Shia Lebanese I've met despise them.
Hezbollah runs like like a gang.
They abuse the legislature to stop government from working.
They deploy thugs to protests to make sure no one gains power.
They kill reform-minded politicians.
They turn Shia neighborhoods no-go.
They get into fights with Israel.
They get arms from Iran, which effectively makes them a puppet.
They're stronger than the armed force, so one can stop them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, they're the main reason why the government can't do literally anything. The really bad stuff they don't do directly, they have one of the little gangs like the SSNP do it for them. But they're the ones pulling the strings.
On the other hand, Lebanon was fricked up before Hezbollah existed. And if you look at the civil war they were actually one of the least bad parties. They didn't do any massacres like everyone else did.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
like, ewwuhh!! what trans boy would ever want a disgusting 🤢🤮🤮🤢 man- 🤢🤢 gags PEEPEE?!? 🤮🤮 as we all know innocent trans bois would never ACTUALLY want to have a peepee and balls?!? 🤢 only cis men can have peepees! and cis men are GROOSS!! YUCKY!!!! i don't like having a peepee so why would THEY want a peepee?! i-its not like phalloplasties even look like real peepees or anything!! do they think im gonna frick them once they obtain a gross looking flesh tube?? because i-i won't! it's not like i want to touch that nasty frankenweiner at all! it's not like i want to suck it or anything!! i totally don't want to grab and grope phalloplasty balls and cup them in my hands! 🤲🏻 and p-put them in my mouth and start sucking on them a little 🥺👉🏻👈🏻.. i TOTALLY don't want to have a huge girthy PEEPEE shoved in my mouth 😳🤤 and then get used as a fleshlight before you C*M in my mouth 😫😫😣🤤🤤🤤... 10 long minutes of silence Ermmm.... she wipes a comically large sweat bead from her forehead w-what was i saying again
Snapshots:
source:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Hussein el-Husseini:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Nabih Berri:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
US Marines and French:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
US Embassy:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
US Embassy building:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Isreali headquarters in Tyre:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
matter how innocent:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
source:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
key leaders:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
what if the militias identify as Hi'a/Him'a
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Anal
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context