This is from a mass arrest of mafia bosses, who were all gathered in the same place to discuss the mafia. No one believed that these guys were actual criminals.
heres a newspaper article about the 1957 mass arrest
— eigenrobot (@eigenrobot) March 1, 2023
it spends its entire length ridiculing the notion that a mafia exists immediately after the heads of the mafia have been arrested en masse at a gathering and while they are all locked in the same jail pic.twitter.com/HZaeELqMWB
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who wrote this random article? People write articles about anything. It does not serve as proof of a consensus that a national mafia was considered a myth.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
SOURCE SOURCE DO YOU HAVE A SOURCE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm saying your "source" is shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context