Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I still don't understand "Out of Africa" theory ngl

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its kinda true. Kinda fake.

When they say out of africa. It implies depth of africa.

When in reality it was coast of mediterance as we know nowdays. Why nowdays? Becouse mediterance wasnt sea back then. It was big lake. And big portions of it were land. There was land bridge between sicily and africa.

In these now underwater regions is where first humans came to be. Then filling of mediterance happened. It took from few months to two years. Atlantic ocean just poured in one day. People had to escape sea. They spread around the region. Thats why creta and other islands of east mediterance have one of oldest archaeological evidencese of humans. They were highlands.

Here is where split happened. Some ended up in fretile crecent and thrived. Some ended in africa. Mates with monkeys and became bipocs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

mediterance

Why?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its debatable.

The oldest splits still within the genome of modern humans are Neanderthals in Eurasians and Denosivans in East asians and Papuans (Reich 58-59) and a ghost population within West africans(Reich 213). There's a plausable alternative theory that the ancestors of modern day humans, denosivans and neanderthals originated in eurasia and our branch migrated back into africa and then came back to BBC the neanderkubs(Reich 69).

Who we are and how we got here: David Reich

Read it chuds

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean they had to come outta somewhere, maybe in 50 years it'll be the out of Bosnia theory or something but East Africa is what we have the most evidence for.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.