Thoughts and opinions on Woodrow Wilson?

Famous for being President during World War One and conceiving the League of Nations. I've noticed a lot of people don't seem to like Wilson :marseythonk: Perhaps !nonchuds hate him for racism? :marseyblackface: Maybe !chuds hate him for prototypical globohomo viewpoints? :marseyglobohomo:

What does the educated dramanaut think? :marseyreportercnn: !historychads discuss

25
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/r/neoliberal would suck the life out of his corpse's peepee if only he hadn't been a segregationist Southern chud.

!neolibs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I feel like everyone from that era was racist by modern standards idk :marseyclueless:

I mean, who wasn't a segregationist then. Lincoln was a segregationist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lincoln was a segregationist.

R-slur opinion. He said maybe we could pay to send them back to Africa if they want to. Which was a quite reasonable proposition since you weren't really allowed to do political polling among slaves in the south. Or be a Yankee.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lincoln never segregated the Federal Government and neither did his immediate successors. Wilson did and he was also a KKK apologist so I think it's fair to say Wilson was a chud even by 1910s standards.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Chud President?!

:#marseyspit:

1916-2016 were basically the same year? :marseydetective:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

His actual crime was inventing nationalism

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17292788909847791.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He did some other stuff too. I mean it was like half a lifetime since the end of the Civil War. There's gonna be buttholes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's an argument against him. It was extremely charitable for us to let this guy run for president.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

14 Points

He was a prophet

If France and Belgium weren't apex cute twinks then there would have been no Hitler and no WW2 and no Holocaust

!chuds not that there ever was a Holocaust

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If the Belgian king hadn't been a traitor none of this would have happened. That's a guy who should have had a personal torture device designed for him and a doctor constantly on guard to make sure he didn't die too soon.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Traitor to who?

At the time The Bri'ish Crown had guaranteed the independence of Belgium by treaty, and what good is your word if you won't back it up? Hence the entry of the then-greatest Naval Power and global empire.

It's difficult to debate that Germany, though acting in self defence against the Franks and Slavs, 100% violated the neutrality of Belgium.

Those plucky fricks put up a good fight at Liége, and did a bigly self-sacrifice when they blew the cute butches (kek) a couple years later.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gimme a fricking break. He stabbed everyone in the back. The Belgians and the French. By being, and you know I don't say this lightly, a fricking nazi.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh you meant later. They were half-OK at killing Germans in 1914

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have no criticism of their performance in that war. But Leopold III should have had his balls cut off while four horses rent his body apart. The guy was a Nazi. If you recall my letter from my relative about the Dutch occupation, these Nazi guys were actually really bad. He pretty well sabotaged the Belgian army's participation in the war.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.