https://old.reddit.com/r/SnapshotHistory/comments/1hh60f7/the_united_states_liberty_after_it_was_attacked/
Reported by:
- HailVictory1776 : Never forget the USS LIBERTY. THE GOYIM KNOW TRANS LIVES MATTER
The United States 'Liberty' after it was attacked by Israel in 1967, killing 35 and wounded 171 people : SnapshotHistory
- 56
- 52
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarnak_Farm_incident
Barely related but pretty funny.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fricking Narcs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Christ that is not a good look
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's funny reading how bongs in desert storm planted bigger and bigger bong flags on their tanks in hope of A-10 not attacking them (and it only half worked)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its unironically a point of debate on why A-10s love friendly fire so much when aircraft with more CAS missions and worse avionics still don't get anywhere near their number per mission flown.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh gee, why does a jet that at the time had basically zero advanced target acquisition systems, and relied solely on pilots seeing things with their own eyes and shooting a lot of bullets at them make a lot of mistakes?
The A-10 is bad and almost every other jet in the US arsenal is better for CAS fight me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It was still achieving the highest friendly fire rate by every possible metric once it had the same or better targetting systems than other aircraft in the same role. Its a bad plane that attracts bad people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I also like the
Cope. The A-10 only takes battle damage because it's a fat slow hog that attracts AA and manpads because it floats around at low altitude moving slowly and piggily while an F-16, F-15 or B-1B can just blast things with precision from 30,000ft and skirt out of danger at Mach 1.5 no problem
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It gets worse when you remember what the A-10 was planned for (taking out Soviet tank columns). US military planners expected that in the event of a conventional war every last A-10 pilot and airframe would be dead within the first two weeks. !historychads
Like genuinely why would you respond to a military force whose entire air defense was focused around powerful SAMs with a no stealth no distance non maneuverable gunner plane as CAS.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Because they'd use the other part of their air force (and tactical missiles) to deal with SAMs? What part of close-air combat do you not understand?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's unironically one of the worst fixed wing projects ever accomplished. It was developed at a time when the USAF was proving out laser guided systems, hi-tech interdictors like the F-111 were coming online, the the F-4 phantom was being fitted with f-14 targeting systems for strike roles. The A-10 was a terrible use of funds and was a huge distraction for the role of the air force, where they should have focused on fast-and-capable interdictors or cheap low-and-slow counterinsurgency prop places like the Super Tucano.
Instead we have a fat hog that costs as much as an F-15 and basically is a slow bullet magnet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know exactly where the enemy is, so I can't laser-guide a bomb there. Okay, just drop one bomb there, and we'll sit around waiting for hours for the next plane to drop a bomb or two nearby.
Do you BIPOCs not think this through?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The funniest part was commies responded with the same, and mounted a massive gun with even more recoil on what would otherwise be their one modern CAS.
It fried random systems in minutes of shooting
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Catchy song tho
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Space Shuttle Vibes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
How? With laser guidance from the ground? And it's only around for a second, so what kind of cover is that?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
They did a big upgrade of all the targeting systems decades ago. That's why they haven't been shredding marines nonstop for the last 2 wars.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
That dude must have hated leafs so much
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
based based based based
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Oh wow Tampons are fricking r-slurs? You don't say
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the nasty girls are american heroes, show some respect
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
#RememberTheLiberty
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
why does Candace Owens care so much about this?
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
because she's very cool
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This one has been hard for me cuz I like the Jews. What the frick Jew bros….
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I had a rebuttal until you portrayed me as a crying soy jack.
Well played
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
No way this was an accident
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its an accident? This shit gets brought up so much i thought the official story was that it was intentional.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It was intentional. The USS Liberty had sig int equipment that presumably was picking up on communications from nearby Israeli forces while they were fighting Egypt. Way above was also the NSA intercepting said communications and which documented a large part of the incident. Basically, the Israelis were killing hundreds of Egyptian POWs and noticed the US ship nearby. They flew out a recon plane that would've been easily able to identify that it was not Egytpian because they had nothing like it. Liberty radios out that they're an American ship. Then, the Israelis send out their aircraft which strafes the ship. Liberty sends more messages saying they're American. Then the Israelis send out two waves of torpedo ships to finish the job.
Body of Secrets by James Bamford is your best source on this. It only took decades of FOIA requests to get enough information to write about. Even then, he doesn't conclude that it was intentional, but he sure hints at it given all the warnings given off by Liberty, the incessant attacks by Israel, the lack of any Egyptian ship nearby nor which had the profile of USS Liberty, and the stakes at play of being discovered of killing POWs.
When the CIA had a recommended book list on their website, they listed three of James Bamford's.
!chuds !nooticers !bookworms, this is recommended reading.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nah, it's total bullshit ranging from literal autism (absence of theory of mind) to intentional lying.
Israeli's actions once they started to suspect that the ship was American don't make any sense in the conspiracy theory framework, that's autism.
Intentional lies include for for example people who "forget" to mention that USS Liberty strafed the torpedo boats first, after which they returned fire and torpedoed her, then stopped the attack once they got closer and saw the English designation on the ship.
Just read the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident
@Brum
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The chosen don't make mistakes, they make choices.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!goyim
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nah, frick you, neighbor bot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
White people and discovering once every 150 years that the orthodox jew doesn't consider you equals. name a more iconic duo.
Jewish lives matter too aevann
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What's wrong with killing POWs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why fire at the ship and then let it limp away if your concern is to keep them from bringing information back home?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Someone gave the r-slurred orders which were later rescinded by someone higher up (and with at least half a brain)? Who knows because you'll never get the full story, but it's plausible.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The Jews want you to think they don't make mistakes or aren't complete r-slurs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Some how inbred and unbearable r-slurs but also genius machinators with Nobel prize winning IQs. Sounds like us!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They aren't all brilliant. They just want you to think so.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pretty brilliant tbh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
35? No goy what are you on about, look at the size of that thing! it was 2 at best
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, there's no way they would have enough time to fire enough missiles to kill that many people.
The numbers just don't add up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wdym?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean, if a cookie monster wants to eat 34 cookies and only take one bite from 171 more, how much time would he need for that? Certainly not enough for a whole torpedo attack.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Redditors are Liberty posting
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't believe the truth will ever be known, and I have a great contempt for history.
-- Gen. George Meade
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/SnapshotHistory/comments/1hh60f7/the_united_states_liberty_after_it_was_attacked/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context