OPEN SYSTEM + ENERGY GOING IN (food) - ENERGY GOING OUT (exercise) = CLOSED SYSTEM
blablabla And when you tell them "no you can't break thermodynamics, but a (healthy) calorie deficit has not worked for me", they go back to their first point. blablabla
BECAUSE WE KNOW YOU'RE JUST SNACKING AND NOT COUNTING IT THIS IS THE MOST COMMON FATTY COPE
I looked up the video because that comment would have sounded so psychotic out of the blue, but it literally starts with Ian talking about how 'he isn't fat because he eats too much, just because he eats a regular amount of things that he enjoys', which as someone who is losing weight himself, is a pretty terrible way to go about it. What's important is not the volume of the food but the calories you consume, it doesn't really matter that the piece of steak he cooks gets split in half when it's full of marbled fat and cooked with such a gigantic piece of butter like the one he used.
Don't get me wrong, uncalled for fatshaming comments are shitty but this didn't seem like one of them like what OP is trying to frame it as.
-7 points
who woulda guessed it, it's not a random "I HATE FAT PEOPLE"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ugh
random comments on random new video
there's just so many layers of r-sluration
the reddit thread is even worse, CICO is just physics, so OF COURSE you have fricking high school dropouts parroting the SAME GARBAGE COPE EVERYTIME
SHUT THE FRICK UP /u/sk3lt3r
THIS IS BASIC THERMODYNAMICS
OPEN SYSTEM + ENERGY GOING IN (food) - ENERGY GOING OUT (exercise) = CLOSED SYSTEM
BECAUSE WE KNOW YOU'RE JUST SNACKING AND NOT COUNTING IT THIS IS THE MOST COMMON FATTY COPE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
there's even some r-slur equating fatshaming to telling smokers to keep yourself safe
you will NEVER be progressive enough
there will ALWAYS be r-slurs wanting gibs and oppression points
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
-7 points
who woulda guessed it, it's not a random "I HATE FAT PEOPLE"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context