The literary canon fake or real? The bard is forged from chat and spiel? Give me a rich dumbie and his money, and daddy shakes will weep at my honey.

https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1711186640876785817
24
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OH MY DARWIN IT EVEN HAS MODERN SOYENCE :sciencejak::marseysoylentgrin:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I forgot that shallow StEM frickboys exist and are annoying.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyoctopus2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What's he trying to prove with this bait? This is over my head.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Remember Sam Bankman-Fried? The guy who ran a multi-billion dollar crypto scam and fricked a hideous girl?

People recently discovered he once tried to prove Shakespeare sucks using population statistics

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16968358618137662.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

STEMcels have such a shallow idea of what a great artist is, like you just rank order everybody with no context and people at the top are “great artists.” His argument makes sense for “tallest” but not something where context and innovation are important and where there's some notion of progression.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He thinks that Shakespeare( the guy who wrote Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Macbeth) is only highly regarded because of tradition and not because his plays are actually good. He believes that if someone paid him, he could write a play as good as Shakespeare. He provided a poetry sample, the reviews are not good.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I thought his example was so intentionally and obviously bad that he was trying to prove to people who want to kill off the Western Cannon that Shakespeare was good?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're very generous. I think he wants people to get pissed off and is exaggerating but basically believes what he is saying.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Steve literally quoted a bunch of nonsense. I tried hard just to scan it and failed. Let alone understand it. Fake prestige is a perfect description.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People who don't understand why this is excellent are hopeless and deserve to live in pods. It can be hard to read something that's meant to be spoken so maybe this will help:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rather than appearing in blank verse, the typical mode of composition of Shakespeare's plays, the speech appears in straight prose:

:marseyfacepalm: well now I feel dumb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseychudhermione:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.