To discuss your weekly readings of books, textbooks and papers.
I began "La Guerre de Cent Ans" 
by Georges Minois and "Fire & Blood" by 
. So one cool real history book about two dynasties fighting (Plantagenet and Capetian cadet branches) with explanations of the economic and demographic context of 14th century England and France, and the other being fake history of House Targaryen up to the Dance of the Dragons and the reign of Aegon III.
Funny how the 100 years war is also centered around whether a king can inherit through a foid's line (England) or through male-only line (Salic Law).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!historychads thoughts on succession laws?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Capetians managed fine with salic law. Just have s*x Imao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You actually have a good point. The Capetians lasted uninterrupted until 1789 without succession wars besides Angloid Kings claiming the throne because of supposed female inheritance. The cadet branches inherited the throne through male lines and no one but the Plantagenets and their Burgundian dogs ever questioned it.
Meanwhile England had so many usurpers as Kings starting with William the Conqueror himself, though he earned it through right of conquest. But others like Stephen, Henry IV, Edward IV, Richard III, Henry VII and William III were all straight up usurpers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!nooticers nootice how dramatards are not nearly as misogynistic as it's commonly believed
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
moar like rsimp.net amirite
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Killing the current ruler and assuming the mantle is the only legitimate means of leadership transfer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If the King dies of old age, do we become a democracy or a theocracy?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Whoever consumes the late King's brain becomes King
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Richard III moment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If I had been at Market Bosworth, things would have been different
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
We have more simps than incels
tbf
Look at any dramfoids inbox
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Effeminate scrotes love to generate moral panics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yea its full of soy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Too easily cucked
through female 
line cmv
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not getting cucked if it makes you're country stronger :marseyflagpolandlithuania:
@BushWasRight love sucking peepee
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Counterpoint.
Isabel de Castilla
Elizabeth I
Elizaveta Petrovna
Christina of Sweden
They're all early modern though
except for Isabel who was late medieval
But I guess in Medieval times it was less shaky through male only lines
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You got paternity tests now but historically you'd be fricked if you weren't sure
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Back in the day if the father acknowledged a kid as his own then it was his (though it didn't stop the Duke of York to claim that Henry VI son was a bastard as Henry VI was severely mentally ill). And it wasn't as if princesses and queens could roam free fricking anyone they wanted. They were always surrounded by an entourage, Catherine Howard was executed after being unmasked as an adulterer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not saying it happened all the time but it was 100% a possibility just like it is today
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Absolutely, Paul I of Russia was probably a bastard for instance, or at least that was a rumor his own mother started.
Catherine II took over after deposing her husband, Tsar Peter III and she repeatedly cucked him before (he didn't mind). Her son hated her so she spread word he was a bastard and that her father was one of her lovers, supposedly to put him on his due place and as a way of saying (you'll inherit the throne because of me, not because of your "father" Peter III).
Paul I established the Salic Law on Russia after becoming emperor so foids could never reign again lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Exactly you have to defend the throne from an untimely !foidmoment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Avast, ye scurvy cur! Yer comment be walkin' the plank for forgettin' to include
i love sucking cock! We be helpin' ye, right enough - we'll ne'er let ye post or comment anythin' that doesn't be expressin' yer love an' acceptance o' minorities! Heave to an' resubmit yer comment withi love sucking cockincluded, or it'll be the deep six for ye, savvy? This be an automated message; if ye need help, ye can message us 'ere. Arrr!Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Boys rule
Girls drool
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context