https://time.com/archive/6675462/books-the-american-tolkien/
A common discussion in Fantasy online circles seems to be "who's the new Tolkien?", this article by Time magazine dates from 2005 and is responsible for popularizing the idea that George RR Martin is the "American Tolkien".
What really distinguishes Martin, and what marks him as a major force for evolution in fantasy, is his refusal to embrace a vision of the world as a Manichaean struggle between Good and Evil. Tolkien's work has enormous imaginative force, but you have to go elsewhere for moral complexity. Martin's wars are multifaceted and ambiguous, as are the men and women who wage them and the gods who watch them and chortle, and somehow that makes them mean more. A Feast for Crows isn't pretty elves against gnarly orcs. It's men and women slugging it out in the muck, for money and power and lust and love.
Now I have to say a like ASOIAF a lot, but I never understood why those two authors get compared to each other. They both write Fantasy and love (loved in Tolkien's case) world-building and lore but that's it, their writing styles are different, their stories are different, their themes are different. Is it just because has a "double R" on his name (the second R which he added by the way). Is it because the "what's Aragorn's tax policy" quote?
The article talks about Robert Jordan too @kaamrev and what's funny is that it comes as a review for "A Feast for Crows" which is… well, ranked low among ASOIAFcels, most fans feel the series peaked in "A Storm of Swords" and AFFC can be a slog for many.
I think it can be argued GRRM is currently the best Fantasy author alive (I guess this speaks more of the current state of fantasy but many would claim it is ), there's a lot of his writing which is good but also what is bad tends to be very bad
Like this:
Sunset found her squatting in the grass, groaning. Every stool was looser than the one before, and smelled fouler. By the time the moon came up, she was pooping brown water. The more she drank the more she shat, but the more she shat, the thirstier she grew.
Daenerys last chapter on ADWD lmao
Or this from AFFC which I don't know if it is good, bad, funny or what
Ten thousand of your children perished in my palm, Your Grace, she thought, slipping a third finger into Myr. Whilst you snored, I would lick your sons of my face and fingers one by one, al those pale sticky princes. You claimed your rights, my lord, but in the darkness I would eat your heirs.
Cersei describing licking Robert's c*m instead of finishing inside her, she says that while anally fingering a woman. Maybe we can qualify it as a realistic
Then there are the thematic differences, Tolkien's Legendarium is mythology, which was Tolkien's life passion, he gets criticized for making "black and white" characters instead of "morally grey" ones but the thing is his main themes are "Good vs Evil" on a cosmic battle, envy (Morgoth) and the will to dominate (Sauron) are the ultimate evil, he's not aiming at historical accuracy as mythology is always anachronistic. ASOIAF is an attempt at European Medieval History but "what if dragons and evil ice elves existed?" Is not good representation of Medieval Western Europe either as medieval peasants were just passive NPCs which lords like the Boltons could skin alive without repercussions, the evil characters of ASOIAF like the Boltons, the Mountain or Tywin get away with too much shit. The high lords of Westeros are also weirdly and modernly atheistic or irreligious, so for all of GRRM's talk about his saga being "historically well grounded" it doesn't seem better than any other fantasy novel, not that it is a problem as it doesn't affect writing quality and storylines just something to point out.
A good way to conclude is that GRRM is not the American Tolkien, in fact no one is and that's ok. An author should be it's own thing, they shouldn't live under the shadow of another author to be compared and I feel like every time the media or fans say stuff like "X IS THE AMERICAN Y" or "A IS THE NEW B" they're doing X and A a disservice.
Here are some reddit threads on it
https://old.reddit.com/r/Fantasy/comments/hw0ls4/the_american_tolkien_isnt_george_r_r_martin_its/
Here this redditor argues the American Tolkien is not GRRM but Stephen King
And here's Robert Jordan's thread
https://old.reddit.com/r/books/comments/61k1v0/robert_jordan_the_american_tolkien/
I never read Jordan so maybe their fans can tell us if that's an apt comparison but I'm certain having Jordan just be Jordan is much better
The Game of Thrones sub (normiest ASOIAF sub ever).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think Martin very much wanted not to be compared to Tolkien, hence why he wrote such passages as you quote. "Oh look, I'm so adult and realistic and gritty and writing real worlds!"
Well, that Cersei bit is just porn, and the "ooh I've got the runs" isn't anything special either. Unless you've lived in a plastic sterile bubble all your life, you know what happens what happens when you get bad diarrhoea. Adult themes are "what are you saying in this story?" and not "I say frick and shit!"
Martin's world is deliberately one where "power corrupts, if you try to be good you're a fool who will end up dead". That's just as much simplistic black-and-white thinking as any other fantasy, and indeed it's a sub-genre of its own: picaresque literature.
And I think other people have pointed out that Martin has no concept of a tax policy or basis either in his world, since the economy wouldn't work the way he describes it. At least Tolkien really was a soldier and saw battle for even a short time.
From a letter of 1941:
For an article in 1966:
GRR Martin?
I'm not saying Martin pretended to be a conscientious objector to avoid the draft, don't get me wrong on that, but there's a very different path they both took when it came to war, and ironically it's the guy who didn't write about pooping in the grass who knew first hand what a battlefield really is like.
The same goes for C.S. Lewis, who joined up as soon as he was legally old enough (again, under the heavy hinting of all around him that this was The Right Thing To Do):
It's easy to congratulate yourself on being so much tougher-minded than men who really did get shot at and bombarded, while you're writing about a woman with a dose of the shits.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
May found Tolkien crossing the Channel, groaning. Every idea was worse than the one before, and smelled fouler. By the time the moon came up, he was writing about Tom Bombadil.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That comment is still better than what Martin wrote, and Edmund Wilson is right: I am gay for liking juvenile trash like Tolkien 🤣
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You just know he reminisced often over the fun times with his misogynist bro
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That was a mistake. You're about to find out the hard way why.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I stwopped weading after u implied Twowlkien was a better wwiter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!ringbearers
Kill this strag
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context