Peak literature analysis from youtube🔥🔥🔥🗣🗣🗣

It comes from this video where they re-cover books. The dude in the video says "there is not a single flowery sentence", in the road, which is already r-slurred, since it has

"He lay listening to the water drip in the woods. Bedrock, this. The cold and the silence. The ashes of the late world carried on the bleak and temporal winds to and fro in the void. Carried forth and scattered and carried forth again. Everything uncoupled from its shoring. Unsupported in the ashen air. Sustained by a breath, trembling and brief. If only my heart were stone."

"Once there were brook trout in the streams in the mountains. You could see them standing in the amber current where the white edges of their fins wimpled softly in the flow. They smelled of moss in your hand. Polished and muscular and torsional. On their backs were vermiculate patterns that were maps of the world in its becoming. Maps and mazes. Of a thing which could not be put back. Not be made right again. In the deep glens where they lived all things were older than man and they hummed of mystery."

but then this commentor says its similar to blood meridian . If you havent read BM it is literally known for having sentences like

"Spectre horsemen, pale with dust, anonymous in the crenellated heat. Above all else they appeared wholly at venture, primal, provisional, devoid of order. Like beings provoked out of the absolute rock and set nameless and at no remove from their own loomings to wander ravenous and doomed and mute as gorgons shambling the brutal wastes of Gondwanaland in a time before nomenclature was and each was all."

So its clear neither of these idiots have actually read

Not only that, this IDIOT thought that, in a book where he notes in the very video the main characters dont even have names, we NEED to see their faces on the cover. Fricking mook

Wendigoon is getting sous vide in heck until the universe goes black