Unable to load image

Book Review: Former Pentagon insider says U.S. unwilling to release all its UFO info | AP News

https://apnews.com/article/imminent-ufos-luis-elizondo-book-review-2d55255f6c8ce730a62040c9529258a0

>A procession of books :marseymoreyouknow: in recent years have explored the UFO phenomenon but few perhaps with the authority :marseyshah: Luis Elizondo brings as a Defense Department insider, laboring for decades to learn :marseymoreyouknow: who the visitors are, where :marseydrama: they are from and what they want.

>In the 275 pages of "Imminent: Inside :marseyenterpipe: the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs," Elizondo provides evidence :marseyproofster: of what the U.S. Department of Defense knows with this somewhat surprising :marseyspit: conclusion – Defense Department higher-ups often thwart Elizondo and his team's efforts.

>Why? Elizondo writes that the defense establishment doesn't want to present :marseybow: a problem :marseycanofworms: it neither can explain nor offer :marseychocolatemilk: a solution. But are these visitors a threat? Elizondo concludes that the visitors' capabilities make them a "very serious :marseysnoomask: national :marseyhomohitler: security :marseyblart: issue."

>Earliest documented UFO sightings go back to before :marseyskellington: World :marseyww1american2: War II and since then, many UFOs have violated sensitive :marseypearlclutch: military :marseytankushanka: airspace but no one appears to have been deliberately hurt by a UFO in the United :marseyeaglerider: States. However, perhaps given his combat :marseygladiator: experiences and long association with Defense Department work, Elizondo worries about another 9-11-type attack, a threat we should :marseynorm: have anticipated but did not.


I don't always agree :marseythumbsup8: with Elizondo, he has reported many false :marseypinocchio2: news especially about rods, he seems like a crackpot, but I have read many of the sourced books :marseymoreyouknow: here and I find them to be based :marseyhesright: on credible reports, just muddied by the authors' biases.

26
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.