/h/lit House Racist
nuclearshill gau/cho  1mo ago (image post) 442 thread views #308320

Stunning and brave opinion. I unironically like Harry Potter :marseyrowling: :marseyhermione:

Unable to load image

!bookworms

Also, I liked the Goblet of Fire film adaptation

>nooooo, but what about Barty Crouch being better explained in the book! And the quidditch tournament fight! And the Hermione elferino libtard movement which was all cut! :soycry: :marseysoycry: :seethejak:

Don't care, and it's the only film Voldemort felt menacing after returning. By the last films he was just kind of goofy.

60
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

Same actually. I read them so often as a kid I pretty much remember everything.

I've only watched most of the movies once, when they came out

>Also, I liked the Goblet of Fire film adaptation

:marseyyikes: I remember hating this one a lot as a kid because it felt like they cut half the story. That was the turning point for me where I stopped caring about the movies as much. I should probably rewatch all the films at some point to get a better perspective on them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Book fans say GoF should have been split as it is a long book, and while that could have solved the whole "missed out material" problem it creates a bigger one, a GoF Part 1 film would have been just a tease and audiences hate that.

I admit that the film labyrinth was super lame though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you split GoF you have to split the other 3 which is just stupid and unnecessary. That being said the books are a much better experience than the films even though the movies had fantastic casting and set design

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.