EFFORTPOST Free my neighbor Patsy: Facts and Logic edition (a rebuttal to the janny cabal and their simps)

Let me start this off with saying that I am, in true !grillers fashion, an impartial party in the Moon v. Patsy dispute. Obviously, I gave Moon a very fair interview, his first out of prison, and have generally been supportive of his presence on this website. I even gave him $50 to buy a microphone so that he could do interviews with not only myself, but whomever he wanted to talk to next. I'm not saying that to hold it over his head, but to show that I am not "coming after him" or joining le evil heckin groomercord moberino

Let's be clear here: @Patsy deserves to be freed.

you cant heckin call people pedorinos!!1

We here at rdrama pride ourselves on being the last bastion of the ways of ye olde internet - a place where you can call people cute twinks, r-slurs, the n word, you name it. We have cultivated a community where, like the internet of old, slapfights over inane, r-slurred bullshit result in years long rivalries and produce sweet, sweet seething and malding between terminally online homos amongst a tight knit community.

NEWS FLASH: THE SPIRIT OF THE OLD INTERNET IS CALLING PEOPLE LIBERTARIANS OVER MILD DISAGREEMENTS

The core argument supplied by the janny cabal is that calling people pedos, without "evidence", is akin to real life harm.

Let me rebute this very easily:

I'm to believe that a fully grown man, who went to prison for years for trolling (unjustly, in my opinion), can't handle being slandered by an r-slur on the internet without janitorial intervention?

Janny Cabal simps: a good faith retort

Let's start out with @arseupwrongo

Our guy here is right in his analysis that libertarian flinging is unfunny and r-slurred. He is also spot on in saying how it develops: r-slur 1 cherry picks an out of context, nothingburger comment and lobs accusations. However, is that really banworthy? If being an unfunny r-slur was banworthy, 99% of you neighbors would be sent packing.

>b-b-but it makes people obligated to respond for hours!!1

No it doesn't, literally just ignore it lol. Seriously, you can just say "no I'm not, you're r-slurred" and let the other person keep sperging. Everyone I've gone after on this website only made it worse by responding to my bait. Of all people, my neighbor moon should know this - which is why he isn't posting about it anymore, I'd assume.

Now, let's move on to @sayxirname

Easily the most r-slurred argument I've seen in regards to this !metashit. Do you really, actually believe that calling someone a libertarian is going to bring the feds here? Do you think that there is a team of feds that tracks the millions of libertarian accusations posted online daily and checks up on them? That they will shut down this website because some r-slur called another r-slur a libertarian?

Aren't the feds more likely to be poking around because a (wrongfully, imo) convicted terrorist, whom they undoubtedly monitor the online activity of, has made this his home and is a moderator? Get real dude. You are the biggest r-slur on this whole website. How much is the janny cabal paying you?

Lastly, let's go over @UraniumDonGER's comment

This is in regard to @Aevann running around and calling SPAL a libertarian, justifying his ban and the behavior that many users and jannies engaged in when they baselessly lobbed libertarian accusations at him.

SPAL is a fricking schizo psycho btw. He's never once had s*x without a condom, including his WIFE of 8 years, because he was worried about catching STDs. He is deeply paranoid and delusional, yes, but this is also in character for him.

This is the best proof that he is a libertarian that anyone can find, and it's baseless speculation at best. He asks for IDs when he takes women out? Wow, what a libertarian!

The fact is that he was banned for calling Carp a libertarian, and trying to find out why he is a felon. This shook carp so badly that he rage quit the site for months and refused to keep being Aevanns head capo unless SPAL was gone.

I don't blame Aevann for doing this. I don't even blame him for banning Patsy. I just think he should be honest: it's his website and he's doing what he's doing to keep his website running how he wants it to. That's fine, but just be honest brother.

Patsy didn't cross a line by harassing another user, that's what this website is all about. He simply made your life harder and didn't listen to you when you laid down the law. SPAL cannot be credibly accused of being a libertarian, he just made your life harder and didnt listen to you when you laid down the law.

Catching a ban on the website comes down to drawing the ire of the janny cabal in 90% of cases. You don't need to make justifications for it, we all know it's true lol.

Final Thoughts

This whole debacle is pure r-sluration, from the top on down. The jannies are being r-slurred, moon was being r-slurred, Patsy was being r-slurred. I'm being r-slurred by making a post that took way longer than I thought it would and wasting a half hour of my day that will ultimately not make a difference. I probably just pissed off a bunch of people I otherwise have a good relationship with for no reason - Patsy will still be banned because he didn't listen to Aevann.

In conclusion, every user on this website, including every member of the janny cabal, is a libertarian. Except for me, of course.