Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You WILL watch dancing whores and sludge content :#marseyjudge:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A U.S. judge late on Thursday blocked Montana's first-of-its kind state ban on the use of short-video sharing app TikTok from taking effect on Jan. 1, saying it violated the free speech rights of users.

Is it though? I'm legitimately curious how that counts as a 1st amendment violation. If the bill blocked accounts, I could see it. Banning a platform doesn't seem anymore unconstitutional than banning some radio frequencies due to being used by the government.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think, from how the law interprets it, it's more akin to banning a newspaper or blog site than to a radio frequency.

Or not, idk :marseyretard2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

our pran for rurr domination wirr be comprete once re have frunctional skibidi toiret

:#marseyjewoftheorient:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

  .-""-.
 /,..___\
() {_____}
  (/-@-@-\)
  {`-=^=-'}
  {  `-'  } Merry Fistmas!
   {     }
    `---'

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.