Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 28,684
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
/h/nerdshit SETTINGS /h/nerdshit LOG /h/nerdshit MODS /h/nerdshit EXILEES /h/nerdshit FOLLOWERS /h/nerdshit BLOCKERS
Current software version: c7d6017
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I didn't even claim to subscribe to the idea, I myself said that there are arguments against it so calm your tits
Jesus it literally just says that instead of treating probabilities as independent you should treat them as conditional. It doesn't make any statements about the likelihood of an event, instead it predicts the likelihood of you observing an event. Similarly it does not offer any info on why things are the way they are so it is NOT and should not be used as an explanation to anything either
See my previous point, it does make predictions on expected measurements
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sorry I just wanted to say something against pseuds, I didn't read your screed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you follow hockey?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, but I heard from mith that Latvia had a match last night, right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Shame.
Yea had a clutch match against poles
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
fight fight fight!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context