Just go to the technology subreddit and you would be lucky to find one article about actual machines and hardware out of the top 20 or 30 posts there on any given day.
The only cool hardware side things that are happening are SpaceX starship and the humanoid robots that have begun to be added to factories.
Software side is just not as exciting because you can make things faster or more colorful with it, but you aren't really creating any new capabilities.
Wow my game runs smoother without the battery heating up vs wow we now have ships that can take us back to the moon.
Even AI is beginning to hit this snag as developing more and more powerful AI requires higher and higher hardware and energy requirements to be fulfilled to store and process all that data. This has limited AI development to the top companies in the world who already have access to billions of dollars to fund the AI projects, thus keeping everybody else out.
The last few innovative technologies I know of were:
1. Self driving cars
2. Drones
3. robot dogs
4. Roombas
5. Humanoid factory robots
6. Spaceships.
7. VR
8. Air fryers
That's it. All technologies that take decades to mature and become commonly available product.
On the software side on the other hand we are doubling or tripling something every year or two, but by the end of the day it is just a further iteration of what was already there. Nothing truly novel is coming out of it.
The world has slowed down in terms of offering new things.
We have less physical things than ever before meanwhile software keeps going up. It feels pointless.
No new generation of trains. No new jets. No new cities. No new world record breaking infrastructure. Just more software. software. software.
We have enough software. We have enough services. Give actual product now.
Compared to software upgrades, hardware is moving at a snail's pace. It is what is holding the world back, the fact that all the money has gone into making digital pixels work more efficiently over making an actually innovative new product.
It took 30-40 years for the US military to replace its rifle. That's how slow the hardware side is currently, and it feels like it's only getting slower over time.
Everybody went all in on big data, and now nothing is left for the new product side of things.
We have had the same tallest sky scraper in the world for 14 years now. Nobody has built anything taller in 14 years. That's embarrassingly slow.
On the other hand you currently have two models of the iphone releasing every year. It's ridiculous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_megaprojects#Water-related
Look at this crap. Every project takes like a decade on average. To notice any major difference in your city you would have to be there for a decade at least. Meanwhile you get 20 different iphones in that same time span. It's ridiculous how little advancement we have made in speeding up physical projects.
Physically the world is moving too slow. In terms of human intelligence growth, the world is moving too slow. Only software is moving at the speed of light now.
The world isn't even going to feel different until 2035 now. Global geopolitical events are moving faster than hardware evolution right now. That's how slow the shitshow is.
GTA VI took 12 years to release after GTA V. The numbers don't make any sense anymore. We are stuck at the top and the only fruit lying around anymore is at the highest branches.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!marseyartists can someone whip me up a marseyr-slursexy Indian dude so I can use that to reply to anything this neighbor post? IDK what the going rate is but I've got the dc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can someone make a Marsey Milei too?
!latinx
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
remind me 5 years
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The fact that you cite an air fryer as a "technological innovation" confirms midwit status. It's a convection toaster oven.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
its an innovation
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
how much you weigh be honest
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
darn neighbor ur fat
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How dare you. I am coming right over to beat your butt.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Watch this video, it will give you an idea of why maglev trains are very expensive and make zero economic sense outside certain countries (this Japanese line for instance is a "prestige project").
!engineering
It applies to any sort of new infrastructure
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I like prestige projects
500km/hr sounds too slow to my cynical mind. That's like a km per 7 seconds.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Video calls on a portable screen have gone from scifi fantasy to something half the world can do in just a decade or two. Kind of silly to say that there are no hardware advances. Moore's Law isn't the only thing to watch.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I agree but my complaint is that it took two decades for video calls to scale up meanwhile chip density or some other equivalent property doubles every two years.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
As Moore's law slows down there will be less low hanging fruit on the software side and we'll get hardware kino again.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I want new bigger megastructures and a small town sized spacestation
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I've pizza-style argued with dramatards that just because they were raised in the tiny sliver of history with rapid technological advancement doesn't mean we will just continue that way forever. It has slowed down and been slowed down for a while. They thought they'd be immortal and inhabiting other planets, and probably the most outrages, thought a synthetic waifu could be made to actually like them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not even about slowing down, there are physical barriers. Like, what's the point of supersonic passenger jets? They're not economically viable (that's why the Concorde is not flying anymore) and neither are Maglev trains in most cases. Japan is now building a Maglev Tokyo to Osaka line which will be finished in 2037 but it's pretty much a prestige project. Building infrastructure with current materials, regulations and salaries is pretty darn expensive and not comparable to 19th century railways.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
synthetic waifu is still possible as long as biofoids dont ban them.
the issue is an abormality like Elon Musk is carrying the future right now. After he goes the tech sector is probably going to slow down by half. poof. slow growth era.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The main problem isn't tech, it's people. The last century was unique in that tech was still easy enough and morals loose enough that you could do incredible things. Now we have entire systems weighing down growth and a need to collaborate to further study.
It took unironic creationists 30 years to go from discovering the atom to nuclear weapons. You really think a decade of billion dollar investment and a reckless disregard for lives wouldn't perfect CRISPR and gene-editing?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
A lot of the interesting problems left are information related. It makes sense that advances occur on the software side.
Additionally, hardware is just wasted as is right now. Most AI toolchains use python because it's rapid to develop, not because it's performant. It makes sense to prototype this way since the cost is so low versus hardware products.
Mathstrags are the hero this century. Any algorithm that uses hardware more efficiently is an advancement.
When you mean hardware were you scoping to outside of computing? It's disheartening to know material science hasn't gotten very interesting for some time. That superconductor drama last year was a cry for help.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes. You understand what I meant. Maglev trains is the one exciting thing that happened and they are still considered an oddity instead of the next generation of trains.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lol there are constantly new and interesting things happening in the hardware space. They just aren't consumer products or big flashy rocketships. But any industry or company that builds a product that includes hardware is developing cool things all the time. You just actually have to know a bit about the hardware involved to understand why the latest iteration is interesting or impressive.
That's the same with any field, really.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
give example.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dall-e and chatGPT are both software
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_megaprojects#Water-related:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context