.webp?h=8 "Top Hat (black) - Traditional. Classy. Elegant.")
!mathematics !antibharatiya I thought the Saars were supposed to be good at math.
By the way, what are some other good and crazy !sophistry stuff from Quora you came across?
Top Poster of the Day:
peepeehands
Current Registered Users: 28,684
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
/h/nerdshit SETTINGS /h/nerdshit LOG /h/nerdshit MODS /h/nerdshit EXILEES /h/nerdshit FOLLOWERS /h/nerdshit BLOCKERS
Current software version: b103b34
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is a classic one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I think I might know how the last Pahjeet came to the conclusion that Brahmins Wuz Kangz in Egypt and shieeeet: The script that nearly all Indian languages are based off of is called "Brahmi", which itself comes from Aramaic which comes from Proto-Sinaitic which itself comes from Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs. Of course he doesn't know about Copts and their language being directly descended from the original Egyptians (as are most Egyptians anyway regardless of their religion).
I've seen similar statements like Pahjeets claiming Hungarians as Aryans from Indian because HungARYAN despite them being one of the rare groups in Europe to have a non-Indo-European language family. It's all surface level Wikipedia knowledge shitted up by their neurodivergent brand of nationalism and lack of English comprehension.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Good to know that the slope of an arbitrary line in 2 dimensions is its slope multiplied by its y-intercept! Thanks Quora!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
every time i read slope i think of chinamen
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dis post will be good to copy for my effortpost
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
did you ever end up passing calc?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
No
I'll try again this time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
He did not.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Fyi, first image is wrong because he applied the product rule to a sum ... not a product
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Try reading
ax+b
As
a times positive b
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wat
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
a * (+b)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Don't have a screenshot but I once saw some slavic guy deny the existence of three-dimensional space
The post included an incredibly r-slurred "proof" which consisted partly of a graph that looked something like this:
and then another graph which was the same as the first except with 'y' & 'z' crossed out and replaced with 'x'
he asserted that this logic could "solve gravity" somehow
really wish I had a screenshot so you could see how schizo the guy was
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
here's a gem: lick my balls
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context