Reported by:
  • JimieWhales : Scientific racism with dramatard characteristics

Evolution is so cool!

https://x.com/eyeslasho/status/1848004187247858090

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021v1

https://archive.is/bHhwf

!ifrickinglovescience !redscarepod !chuds

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17294715382682695.webp

114
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

R-slurs don't realise that gene expression is highly influenced by the environment.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To some degree but adoption studies have already been done and shown the environment has nil effect on intelligence

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's not what adoption studies showed or even can show sweaty

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sure they can. Youre just kinda r-slurred and don't understand basic research methods. Just a fragile kid upset that not everyone is equal, many such cases

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8513766/

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you have any relevant qualifications?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, I have a bachelors; masters, and PHD in a related field

But it really doesn't matter, anyone can use google scholar and figure this stuff out, it's hardly arcane

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What's the related field?

anyone can use google scholar and figure this stuff out, it's hardly arcane

Then why don't you? The paper you linked doesn't support you at all, but you don't even realize it :marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry I'm not gonna dox myself over correcting some tabula rasa BS

Also the paper backed me up, 8 percent basically nothing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

8% of variance explained, not "effect on intelligence" sweaty 😘 "related field" is so vague, you've probably never taken a course on genetics. Guessing ur an engineer, not even a real scientist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:eslsoyjak#talking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Throwing endless money and resources to BIPOCs and seeing little improvement also showcases the failings of the egalitarian side. It's like how the Marshall Plan worked for Europe but all the foreign aid for Africa goes nowhere.

Environment has an effect when it comes to actual malnorishment, like experiencing a famine. Which can explain some of the reason Black Africans score much lower than African Americans on IQ tests, for example. There's very few BIPOCs living in the west that are malnorished to a significant degree. You can lower a group below their potential by stunting/malnorishing them, but you can't raise them above their potential by throwing resources at them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:

!jannies chud this race realist already. The only race realism I want to see on rdrama is anti-wh*te!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The real race realism is everyone should frick Jews and only Jews

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cute twink bootlicker poopskin :marseybootlicker2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!jannies new chud just dropped

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Stop making racist alts to self-report, Borpa :marseysquint:
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I PAY U 100K DC TO SHUT UP

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Keep yourself safe NOW reddit cute twink! :marseyky#s2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the only thing missing is a link to purchase The Bell Curve, hitler.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>throw money at r-slurred bureaucracy

>doesn't do anything

Yeah, case closed there. Nigs are just r-slurred I guess.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wrong. The children I beat with a hammer have a decline in intelligence

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

For one, twin studies are almost always done within a country, which definitely limits the amount of environmental variation that can occur. No malnutrition is happening in a western country, for example.

The other thing is that intelligence does tend toward that of the adopted parents, but it normalizes in adulthood.

Even then there is some small variation between twins. So it's not 100% genetic.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The other thing is that intelligence does tend toward that of the adopted parents, but it normalizes in adulthood.

No it doesn't, not even a little. The correlation is near zero but very strong with bio parents

The variation between twins could be due to a ton of stuff that is non environmental, probably it's just measurement error

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Moreso they don't realize just how complex the interplay between genes and environment is. The same genetic makeup could result in completely different phenotypes in different cultural contexts for example.

And comparing sickle cell disease to intelligence is obv just dumb af

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jeets in Canada :marseymaidchingchong: have proved that inverting an environment :marseyunless: makes zero perspective difference :marseypamsame: in how r-slurred :marseyautismchonker: they are


:#marsey:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The problem is jeets bring their environment with them :marseydisgust:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What side is making the presumptions? There's no serious race realist who is arguing the environment doesn't influence anything and all variations one perceives are down to inherent genetic differences, no race realist denies epigenetics either. What they do deny is the presumption that the races are inherently equal under a blank slate and the variations we see are due to structural racism and environmental influence.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's obvious nonsense to claim that racial IQ differences are caused (in meaningful parts) by genetic differences that directly influence intelligence itself (whatever this means tbh). The "evidence" people like you bring up always betrays a complete lack of understanding of the complexities involved.

As I said, even if you could pinpoint important "inherent genetic differences", the difference in outcome could well be completely caused by "structural racism and environmental influence". Obviously no one is a blank slatist in current year, but genes influence the environment, and the environment influences genes.

And pointing to sickle cell disease (or eye color, or skin color...) and comparing it to a highly polygenic trait like intelligence is just r-slurred tho u should know better lmap

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>It's obvious nonsense too claim that racial IQ differences are caused (in meaningful parts) by genetic differences that directly influence intelligence itself (whatever this means tbh).

The old cop-out, this is the game little children play too weasel out of an argument. "Well what is a chair anyway, a rock could be a chair, so could a stick when you sit on it" one says too the furniture manufacturer. There's no culture on earth where being called smart isn't praise and being called stupid isn't an insult. People everywhere, in all languages, in all cultures, have understood what it means too be smart or stupid.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17294788880750756.webp

Literally read this book that looks into g, the common factor too what we call intelligence. People good at one subject or test tend too be good at others. People bad at one subject or test tend too be bad at others. There's over 5,000 genes known that code for parts of the brain, these genes vary in distribution between the races, just as races vary in mental ability. Too pretend this wouldn't explain a major part the massive disparities we see between groups is, as @Jared_Taylor said, racial creationism.

BLACK LIVES MATTER

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not clear what it means for a genetic factor to directly influence intelligence, independent of the environmental context.

There's over 5,000 genes known that code for parts of the brain,

Exactly. Quite absurd to claim such a highly polygenic trait would show meaningful "race" differences.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Quite absurd to claim such a highly polygenic trait would show meaningful "race" differences.

Makes no sense honestly. That's like saying because two different ships both have thousands of different parts that interconnect in a complex manner, they must sail at the same speed and the differences in performance between the two are entirely due too the waves or fuel put into them. Never mind they're structurally built different, complex things have too be the same if you don't understand it, according too you.

We can measure IQ, we can notice things like rates of psychopathy, ability too delay gratification, the actual structure of the brain, the size of the brain, varies significantly, and the genes that code for these differences vary in their presence or expression between different races. It's too be expected that the variations we see between how the different races go about life are due too this.

RACIAL SCIENCE SAYS BLACK LIVES MATTER

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Makes no sense honestly.

It's quite telling that it doesn't make sense to you, albeit not surprising 😘 Ironic that you're calling me a creationist and then give intelligently designed ships as an example.

It's too be expected that the variations we see between how the different races go about life are due too this.

The evidence does not support this at all, no.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>The evidence does not support this at all, no.

What evidence is there that the races are equal above the neck? No seriously, it's just treated as an axiom. Even if you don't agree with the race realist position, you shouldn't dismiss it out of hand. It certainly has a lot more going for it than the neo-lysenkoists.

Black lives matter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

>Quite absurd to claim such a highly polygenic trait would show meaningful "race" differences.

Why? As far as I understand it, only the selective pressures should matter.

Dog-breeds have different "IQs" too, despite being polygenic there too. Obviously, humans are very different from dogs, but this should still prove that even highly polygenic traits can be different between similar populations due to genetic differences.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dog breeds are very clearly distinct, human "races" are not. Obv polygenic traits are subject to selective pressure too.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#taylaugh: :#tayclap:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Don't even try to argue with these r-slurs man.

:marseydepressed:

Being right is no use.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not arguing to convince them, I just want them to post more stupid comments without realizing how stupid they sound

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do magic dirt next lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Explain how American dirt is actually magic just like how blank slatism is just misunderstood by the plebs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Blank slatism is r-slurred not misunderstood

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't try to tell them about reaction norms. It'll completely fry their brain

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There was that thing with peppered moths, pre-industrial revolution they were mostly white to blend in with the birch tree.

In comes a ton of coalburning and soot, trees get darker, and the moths with more peppering blended in better, which improved their odds of survival against predators.

Then we started cleaning the air and the pvre white moths increased expression


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17191743323420358.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Neo-Lysenkoist thinks because epigenetics is a thing in some instances we're uwu wholesome blank slates.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lysenkoism is commie fake science

Officials eventually put Lysenko in charge of Soviet agriculture in the 1930s. The only problem was, he had batty scientific ideas. In particular, he loathed genetics. Although a young field, genetics advanced rapidly in the 1910s and 1920s; the first Nobel Prize for work in genetics was awarded in 1933. And especially in that era, genetics emphasized fixed traits: Plants and animals have stable characteristics, encoded as genes, which they pass down to their children. Although nominally a biologist, Lysenko considered such ideas reactionary and evil, since he saw them as reinforcing the status quo and denying all capacity for change. (He in fact denied that genes existed.)

Instead, as the journ*list Jasper Becker has described in the book Hungry Ghosts, Lysenko promoted the Marxist idea that the environment alone shapes plants and animals. Put them in the proper setting and expose them to the right stimuli, he declared, and you can remake them to an almost infinite degree.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who asked b-word :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.