Him beating Girlboss Hildawg in 2016 was funny because of how unexpected it was, but the last 8 years have made the libs so smug and insufferable that it would be the dramagedeon if he wins this year, so I'm here for it.
It was unexpected and a slap in the face to their smugness. The only problem is if he wins again this shit will prob get worse. I wish there was a republican who was charismatic and able to really take advantage of libtardism, but if this is it then frick it I'm not voting for the party whose greatest weapon is extremely doubtful r*pe claims from decades ago
collectijismMien/Fuhrr
yahweh gave us human faces to spare the Jews the distress of having servants who look like animals
JurBeePurtzker 10mo ago#5845146
spent 0 currency on pings
Frick you charasmatic presidents since the tv age is why we need too repeal the 14th amendment. Or give a testosterone test before voting eligibility so limp wristed pathetic men like you are allowed too stay home with the women and children as we take this country back. You apologetic wimp of a man should be used as prison s*x slaves
collectijismMien/Fuhrr
yahweh gave us human faces to spare the Jews the distress of having servants who look like animals
BussyAtomSmasher 10mo ago#5847010
spent 0 currency on pings
Women vote with their kitty they should not be allowed too vote if we want too keep our republic
Frick you charasmatic presidents since the tv age is why we need too repeal the 14th amendment. Or give a testosterone test before voting eligibility so limp wristed pathetic men like you are allowed too stay home with the women and children as we take this country back.
collectijismMien/Fuhrr
yahweh gave us human faces to spare the Jews the distress of having servants who look like animals
JurBeePurtzker 10mo ago#5845294
spent 0 currency on pings
Apologizing for you're inner constitution is what women do and you're basically one or a European same thing l. Theirs a reason their plan is too replace us. We are the threat too worldwide communism. You are what they want apologetic cucks that will bow too their wishes without question.
People who think you need an f15 too water the tree of liberty
My main position rn is that I support whatever has the best chance of making the libs who run the institutions look in the mirror and say: 'oh wow we really let this get out of hand, maybe we should dial back our smugness a bit and stop burning through every bit of goodwill the general public has left'.
Complete and never gonna happen of course but I'll settle for making them mad.
We wrote the law to say that if you appeal you need to put up 10x the fine amount, as cash, and if you lose the appeal you lose that money and we sue you again
We wrote the law to say that if you appeal you need to put up 10x the fine amount, as cash, and if you lose the appeal you lose that money and we sue you again
PrussianBlueprus/sian
a deeply rich and beautifully painted shade of prussian blue
zozbot 10mo ago#5845983
spent 0 currency on pings
✡️🌈☢️ Lost 100 coins
The Adult Survivors Act (ASA) is New York State legislation enacted in May 2022 which amends state law to allow alleged victims of sexual offenses for which the statute of limitations has lapsed to file civil suits for a one-year period, from November 24, 2022, to November 24, 2023. The act thus expands the ability of plaintiffs to sue for sexual assault and unwanted sexual contact in the workplace.
On the day the law took effect, writer E. Jean Carroll filed a suit against businessman and politician Donald Trump, the U.S. president, for defamation and battery.
Before 2019, a three-year statute of limitations applied to civil suits for sexual misconduct in New York. In 2019, New York extended the statute of limitations for civil suits arising from s*x crimes against adults to 20 years, but this extension was not retroactive.
In 2022, the ASA was enacted. The bill was sponsored by state Senator Brad Hoylman and Assemblymember Linda Rosenthal. It unanimously passed the Senate in April 2022, passed the Assembly on a 140–3 vote in May 2022, and was signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul.
The chuds are claiming this law was passed as a political hit job against Trump and coincidently Caroll hit him with a case the day the law passed. Why are they so r-slurred? I have no doubt about Carroll being used as a political battering ram but they can't accept that their daddy just got rolled in court.
Carroll and her lawyers had a year and a half to prepare this.
I don't get your point. That was not a coincidence, they passed a law specifically to allow her to sue past the statute of limitations (the 20 years even if it was retroactive) and so she did so as soon as the law went into effect.
Crazy that Caroll actually started this lawsuit in 2016 and had to put it on hold while Trump was in office, so any conspiracy after 2016 doesn't even make sense
Holy shit lmao. I thought it extended the statue of limitations or something. But nope, it's literally just "yeah it's open season, statue of limitations don't matter, for exactly one year".
I swear these people should just push a bill to eliminate statue of limitations altogether if they're so fricking pressed about it. They won't because that's incredibly r-slurred but this kind of doubletalk really pisses me off.
In response to an email referencing Trump, Martin wrote: “As soon as we are both well enuf to scheme, we must do our patriotic duty again…” Carroll responded: “TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet.”
“Were you and Ms. Martin scheming to bring down Donald Trump?” Carroll's lawyer asked. She laughed and said no.
Trump denied the allegations, prompting Carroll to sue him for defamation in November 2019 (a.k.a. Carroll I).
In November 2022, Carroll filed her second suit against Trump (a.k.a. Carroll II), renewing her claim of defamation and added a claim of battery under the Adult Survivors Act, a
You r*ped me!
No, I didn't.
Thats defamation!!!
Shit's r-slurred.
Anyway, that law made sense for former inmates who alleged that they were sexually assaulted. Still, I don't see how they really prove or disprove it.
collectijismMien/Fuhrr
yahweh gave us human faces to spare the Jews the distress of having servants who look like animals
pizzashill 10mo ago#5846116
spent 0 currency on pings
How many people survived communist/nazi show trials? Do you think you're the one that defies the reason and proves you're not guilty?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lmao how did trump lose the civil case
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Glowies decided he had to.
I sincerely hope he wins the presidency and doesn't pay lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hes a complete r-slur, but at this point I'd rather him win than reward the democrats for this shit they've been pulling
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Him beating Girlboss Hildawg in 2016 was funny because of how unexpected it was, but the last 8 years have made the libs so smug and insufferable that it would be the dramagedeon if he wins this year, so I'm here for it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It was unexpected and a slap in the face to their smugness. The only problem is if he wins again this shit will prob get worse. I wish there was a republican who was charismatic and able to really take advantage of libtardism, but if this is it then frick it I'm not voting for the party whose greatest weapon is extremely doubtful r*pe claims from decades ago
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Frick you charasmatic presidents since the tv age is why we need too repeal the 14th amendment. Or give a testosterone test before voting eligibility so limp wristed pathetic men like you are allowed too stay home with the women and children as we take this country back. You apologetic wimp of a man should be used as prison s*x slaves
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wat
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Women vote with their kitty they should not be allowed too vote if we want too keep our republic
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How old r u?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
errr
do u mean the 19th amendment bb?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yes, the guy who grew up with a silver spoon in his mouth, constantly talks with his hands, gets spray tans and dyes his hair is peak masculinity
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Apologizing for you're inner constitution is what women do and you're basically one or a European same thing l. Theirs a reason their plan is too replace us. We are the threat too worldwide communism. You are what they want apologetic cucks that will bow too their wishes without question.
People who think you need an f15 too water the tree of liberty
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
My main position rn is that I support whatever has the best chance of making the libs who run the institutions look in the mirror and say: 'oh wow we really let this get out of hand, maybe we should dial back our smugness a bit and stop burning through every bit of goodwill the general public has left'.
Complete and never gonna happen of course but I'll settle for making them mad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well that's not going to happen so you better just vote for Biden.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
shut up libtard
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lol have fun paying $83 million
We wrote the law to say that if you appeal you need to put up 10x the fine amount, as cash, and if you lose the appeal you lose that money and we sue you again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
what are you even talking about lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Noooooo you can't just retroactively change the law to punish your political enemies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We changed the law retroactively in good faith.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Never gonna happen LMAO
Smugness is more addictive than heroin to the avg social media user
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good point, don't care
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Who's who in your scenario?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Both are both
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's a big part of why I want him to win, too. Would I prefer a better candidate? Yes, but this shit is literally insane
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
They literally made a law just so the actual case (not the civil one) could be brought against him lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And that's a good thing because
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zoz
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zozzle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots400
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Fill me in on this. I keep reading this everywhere hoping to stumble upon someone elaborating what happened, but it never materializes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Survivors_Act
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!nooticers !nonchuds
The chuds are claiming this law was passed as a political hit job against Trump and coincidently Caroll hit him with a case the day the law passed. Why are they so r-slurred? I have no doubt about Carroll being used as a political battering ram but they can't accept that their daddy just got rolled in court.
Carroll and her lawyers had a year and a half to prepare this.
BUT
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
THIS GOES DEEPER THAN I THOUGHT !nooticers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't get your point. That was not a coincidence, they passed a law specifically to allow her to sue past the statute of limitations (the 20 years even if it was retroactive) and so she did so as soon as the law went into effect.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Crazy that Caroll actually started this lawsuit in 2016 and had to put it on hold while Trump was in office, so any conspiracy after 2016 doesn't even make sense
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They're not even hiding it anymore🤡
Crazy I tried to google wtf happened and got nothing but tabloid answers too
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Which law was that?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Survivors_Act
Enacted for exactly one year and Trump was the first case brought lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Holy shit lmao. I thought it extended the statue of limitations or something. But nope, it's literally just "yeah it's open season, statue of limitations don't matter, for exactly one year".
I swear these people should just push a bill to eliminate statue of limitations altogether if they're so fricking pressed about it. They won't because that's incredibly r-slurred but this kind of doubletalk really pisses me off.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm pretty sure it was literally only so she could sue Trump for bad press
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's what I had assumed but it passed the NY State Senate with unanimous support and only had 3 nays in the house.
___________________________________________________________________________
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I also liked this part:
And that apparently settled it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You r*ped me!
No, I didn't.
Thats defamation!!!
Shit's r-slurred.
Anyway, that law made sense for former inmates who alleged that they were sexually assaulted. Still, I don't see how they really prove or disprove it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is it r-slurred if she knows any New York jury will side with her?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Trump's lawyer to Trump:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
There's a lot of prominent celeb cases that were filed on the last day or close too it. That actually seems worse than being a day 1 filer
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lol disregard my previous ask. Thank you 🙏.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No prob, I was wrong though (i think), it was for the civil case
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Trump is literally too r-slurred to defend himself in court.
Its why most lawyers wont represent him.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How many people survived communist/nazi show trials? Do you think you're the one that defies the reason and proves you're not guilty?
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Play stupid games...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Because tard lives in Democratic areas while being a republican
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Trump is even more r-slurred than this skank with his inconsistencies. It's dumb & dumber
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context