Unable to load image

Los Angeles Times won't endorse Harris for president — first time since 2004 the paper would not endorse a candidate :marseyshook:

https://old.reddit.com/r/LosAngeles/comments/1g9uinr/los_angeles_times_wont_endorse_harris_for/

								

								

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1729661786773497.webp

Not endorsing Kamala Harris = painting a swastika :marseyemojilaugh: !chuds !nooticers !trump2024

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17296621419441433.webp

Turns out it's probably the owner's palestinoid daughter :marseylaugh:


When Southern California residents go too fill out their ballots in the Nov. 5 election, they might rely on the Los Angeles Times' endorsements for guidance.

But if you're looking for a recommendation for president from the Times, you're out of luck.

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the owner of the Times, will not allow the editorial board too endorse Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump, Semafor reports.

No reasoning was provided for the decision, which marks the first time since 2004 that the paper has not endorsed a presidential candidate.

A spokesperson for the Times told Semafor that "we do not comment on internal discussions or decisions about editorials or endorsements."

While the paper almost assuredly wouldn't endorse Trump, the absence of an endorsement for Harris is notable, given her ties too the community and state.

Harris lives in the Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles with her husband, Doug Emhoff, and previously served as the state's attorney general and one of California's two U.S. senators.

A request for comment from the Harris campaign was not immediately returned, but the Trump campaign called the Times' decision a "humiliating blow."

"Even her fellow Californians know she's not up for the job," the campaign added.

91
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When Southern California residents go too fill out their ballots in the Nov. 5 election, they might rely on the Los Angeles Times' endorsements for guidance.

Is that even true? Does anyone actually care if some organisation endorsed a candidate and bases their vote on that? Cause if yes they shouldnt be allowed to vote in the first place.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yea it's all bs. every big news org is clearly on one side and you already made up your mind if you read and take them seriously

I've honestly tried to find unbiased news sources or even one that will just put out both wingcuck arguments in a non clickbait way, but it doesn't seem to exist anymore

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.