Akshually my Iowa poll was totally correct but it energized Trump voters that's why he won by 13 points :!marseyfoidretardtalking:

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1854617892546830726

								

								

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17310128600542958.webp

!nooticers :marseyxd:

74
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's saying that if she skewed the poll results to show Harris ahead that wouldn't help the Democrats, it would help the Republicans.

Maybe that's what happened.

Probably was tongue-in-cheek. :marseyshrug: If she actually says "yes, I really believe the Republicans won because of my poll" then she is a tard. Doesn't change the fact that anyone who believes she doesn't know what D and R means is an actual literal r-slur lacking the ability to do logical reasoning like an adult human should.

I love how you cute twinks always ping me about this stuff, like I'm supposed to be really emotionally invested in it. I never heard of this woman until a couple days ago and if I hear about her again in 4 year I'll have forgotten who she is. But you knuckle-dragging r-slurs imagine I must be in love with her if I corrected something stupid that was said about her. I'll say "The Israelis have been extremely cautious about getting into a ground war in Lebanon." Then Nasrallah gets killed. Then my inbox is filled with gloating twinks asking me how I feel now that my boyfriend is dead. You can't get under my skin because I don't give a shit about these people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love how you cute twinks always ping me about this stuff

:#marseyembrace: I shall interpret this as an invitation to keep doing it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like Redactor's grumpy grandpa arc

(Let's see if I can trigger a response) @Redactor0 Why are you simping for journos? :marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because I remember a time when there were actually good journos. :marseyboomer:

Let's see if I can trigger a response

The big secret is: Just give me any attention at all and I usually respond at least once. :marseythumbsup:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>any attention at all

He just like me fr fr

:marseyzoomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyagreefast:

Please do. I can never get enough attention.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's alotta seething words to say you don't care bub

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pinging people to argue with them is fun. And it means someone remembered you and wants to talk with you. :@redactor0love::@redactor0love::@redactor0love: You should play along.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It makes me feel important. :#marseyaward:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, your one single poll was responsible for a 16 point shift...

If single polls had such a large effect size in how people vote on the day you can bet both sides would be spending a significant portion of their total campaign cash to commission polls and then release those which showed their side losing slightly.

The fact that they don't do this suggests someone is wrong here, and it's not the behemoths whose whole raison d'etre is to get more votes for their side.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nothing inspires confidence in your abilities like ending your paragraphs with "maybe that's what happened."

:#marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Now THIS is cope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I lie to democrat pollsters because I don't like them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

why tf are chuds still so assblasted about this poll? I would've thought they'd be over it by the evening of the release (nope) or by election day (also nope). Instead they're still whining about it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Own the libs

Pwn a foid

Laugh at an r-slur

Pick your poison.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also dunk on all the reddit-brained r-slurs saying "but it's the gold standard poll they're never wrong hurrr durrrrrrr :marseyretard3: "

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Betting markets remain the true gold standard over supposed "polls" :marseysmug2:

!goomble represent

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!bookworms !chuds !the_donald

A haiku


Pwn the libs and foids

I kek at all ev'ry r-slur

Pick your poison, dude

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kamala could have won if she won Iowa. The math works out.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Based and Double-Downpilled

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Across both parties, voters were more likely to intent to vote for the party if the poll showed increased electoral support than if presented with no poll or a poll showing decrease in electoral support for the party. This provides evidence for the band-wagon hypothesis in the survey experiment: voters flock towards parties that show electoral strength.

Science disagrees

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most accountable woman

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river."

Snapshots:

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1854617892546830726:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.