IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUSCHAD/STUD
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Israeli children.
20d ago(video post)1,611 thread views#316523
IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUSCHAD/STUD
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Israeli children.
JimieWhales 20d ago#7316923
spent 0 currency on pings
i actually just pasted your question into google and got this lol
JimieWhalesshe/bitch
An educated, strictly organic, ortho molecular aware patriotic princess.
IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUS 20d ago#7316944
spent 0 currency on pings
That sounds like some AI bullshit. This article from some law website is like "uh... it's complicated, hire a lawyer" But obviously they want everyone to solve all their legal problems with lawyers.
Same with doctors. As a man with above-average intelligence I am perfectly capable of diagnosing and treating myself and I am not falling for the "see a physician if..." scam
IVIayaelTheAnimaI/We
I’m 100% certain that at least half the mods do not have Faith or the Holy Spirit.
JimieWhales 19d ago#7318674
spent 0 currency on pings
That sounds like some AI bullshit
Well yeah it literally says so right there in the header
Trump won a big victory, but you need far more overwhelming support to pass an amendment, and I don't think Trump of all people could possibly get that support for literally anything.
Take a close look at the electoral map and then let me know where they're going to come up with 3/4 of the state legislatures (38 states lol) to ratify their amendments.
Judicial review, even Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch are strict constructionists. Congress cannot contravene the Constitution, if a law is unconstitutional it is unenforceable.
Normally, uhh, yeah, but historically, in representatitive republics with these 3 branches: a state of exception or emergency makes prior rulings are irrelevant. What matters is is loyalty and hegemony.
Trump has loyalty and Hegemony, only thing he needs is a state of exception/emergency and the SC will play ball.
>All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
KoreanGrinchKinghey/hem
Tallest Ricecel on this site. Increasing the East Asian Birth Rate by ANY means necessary
Geniud2 19d ago#7317962
Edited 19d ago
spent 0 currency on pings
Surely all those CCP/Saudi/Jeet Princelings born in the US and then flown back to their shitholes won't harm the US in 30 years
They are supposed to refuse entry to pregnant women near term
On January 24, 2020, the Department of State amended its B nonimmigrant visa regulation to address birth tourism. Under this amended regulation, U.S. consular officers overseas will deny any B visa application from an applicant whom the consular officer has reason to believe is traveling for the primary purpose of giving birth in the United States to obtain U.S. citizenship for their child.
Yeah but that became legally untenable, it was originally assumed they were independent sovereign nations.
US v. Wong Kim Ark is more relevant. Wong Kim Ark was a man who had been born in the United States to Chinese parents. After he went to visit China, he was denied the right to re-enter the United States under the terms of the Chinese Exclusion Act. He argued that the terms of the Act did not apply to him because, having been born in the United States, he was a citizen of this country. The majority of the Supreme Court agreed—In the 1890s
Anyone who sets foot in the US except for diplomatic personnel and foreign politicians are subject to the laws of the nation and no conceivable argument can be made that they aren't
IVIayaelTheAnimaI/We
I’m 100% certain that at least half the mods do not have Faith or the Holy Spirit.
GuyOnABuffalo 19d ago#7318676
spent 0 currency on pings
Or, if birthright citizenship is decided to be an absolute thing, the kid gets deported with the parents but has the right to move to the US once they turn 18
You can't deport the children, but they could leave voluntarily to stay with the parents.
Also, extreme hardship to a U.S. citizen child can be a defense that allows cancellation of removal, but it has to be more than the ordinary hardship of deportation so that's rarely granted. Usually you see that when they allege the child won't be able to get medical care in the foreign country, or the like.
You can't force them to leave, but they can move voluntarily with their parents and return whenever they want later
I know a lot of people in Mexico with US citizenship who live there because they have a career and land or whatever (i'm not friends with poors so there's that)
It was common for a long time for people on the border to go back and forth, lots of people in Nuevo León were born in the US and vice versa
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What's the actual law on deporting US citizen children with non-citizen parents?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i actually just pasted your question into google and got this lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That sounds like some AI bullshit. This article from some law website is like "uh... it's complicated, hire a lawyer" But obviously they want everyone to solve all their legal problems with lawyers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How about for each illegal, we pick one of those tards who threatens to move to Canada and deport them instead? Remember, bottled water only, Lily!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Same with doctors. As a man with above-average intelligence I am perfectly capable of diagnosing and treating myself and I am not falling for the "see a physician if..." scam
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The Big Lawyer always wins.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Well yeah it literally says so right there in the header
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Trump says he's going to end birthright citizenship
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Would require a constitutional amendment. It'll never happen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not necessarily, the jury is out on whether congress can define it, birthright citizenship is not explicitly written in the constitution.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Say that to R* House, senate, WH, SC. Trump can do whatever he wants and you just have to like it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol they will not pass a single amendment in the next 4 years on any subject.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
40 years*
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
says increasingly nervous man for 9th time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Trump won a big victory, but you need far more overwhelming support to pass an amendment, and I don't think Trump of all people could possibly get that support for literally anything.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And especially not for presidency
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Take a close look at the electoral map and then let me know where they're going to come up with 3/4 of the state legislatures (38 states lol) to ratify their amendments.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
75% of state legislatures have to ratify amendments you r-slurred BIPOC
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The Constitution is the supreme law of the land so anything passed by Congress would be shot down just based on 150 years of case law
They might pass it to make it look like they tried though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
shot down by who?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Judicial review, even Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch are strict constructionists. Congress cannot contravene the Constitution, if a law is unconstitutional it is unenforceable.
Their past rulings on similar cases support this
BIPOCs ate my cat
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Normally, uhh, yeah, but historically, in representatitive republics with these 3 branches: a state of exception or emergency makes prior rulings are irrelevant. What matters is is loyalty and hegemony.
Trump has loyalty and Hegemony, only thing he needs is a state of exception/emergency and the SC will play ball.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
i think he said some bullshit about 're-interpreting' the constitution.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Seems pretty clear to me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i see some wriggle room
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Surely all those CCP/Saudi/Jeet Princelings born in the US and then flown back to their shitholes won't harm the US in 30 years
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They are supposed to refuse entry to pregnant women near term
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The Mayocide is nigh.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Latinx are white now, mayos will live
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is the key phrase. Native Americans for example weren't citizens until a law in the 20s because they weren't considered subjects of the US.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah but that became legally untenable, it was originally assumed they were independent sovereign nations.
US v. Wong Kim Ark is more relevant. Wong Kim Ark was a man who had been born in the United States to Chinese parents. After he went to visit China, he was denied the right to re-enter the United States under the terms of the Chinese Exclusion Act. He argued that the terms of the Act did not apply to him because, having been born in the United States, he was a citizen of this country. The majority of the Supreme Court agreed—In the 1890s
Anyone who sets foot in the US except for diplomatic personnel and foreign politicians are subject to the laws of the nation and no conceivable argument can be made that they aren't
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Trump is stubborn enough to make it happen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's easy. The child stays with the parents who are responsible for them. They all have to go back.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or, if birthright citizenship is decided to be an absolute thing, the kid gets deported with the parents but has the right to move to the US once they turn 18
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe. Don't really care. Prefer 'no' because they shouldn't have been born here to begin with.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You can't deport the children, but they could leave voluntarily to stay with the parents.
Also, extreme hardship to a U.S. citizen child can be a defense that allows cancellation of removal, but it has to be more than the ordinary hardship of deportation so that's rarely granted. Usually you see that when they allege the child won't be able to get medical care in the foreign country, or the like.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Its not uncommon to send the children with the parents until they get older
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You can't force them to leave, but they can move voluntarily with their parents and return whenever they want later
I know a lot of people in Mexico with US citizenship who live there because they have a career and land or whatever (i'm not friends with poors so there's that)
It was common for a long time for people on the border to go back and forth, lots of people in Nuevo León were born in the US and vice versa
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context