IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUSCHAD/STUD
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Israeli children.
20d ago(video post)1,611 thread views#316523
i literally don't even understand what sort of answer you could possibly give besides that one? like is the implication that you're not supposed to deport people who dragged their kids through 300 miles of desert?
IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUSCHAD/STUD
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Israeli children.
johannesalthusius 20d ago#7317049Found 17 Coins!
spent 0 currency on pings
Deport the parents, congratulations, the kid is now a ward of the state. Easy.
Don't like it? Ok, we can end birthright citizenship which is nonsense.
JimieWhalesshe/bitch
An educated, strictly organic, ortho molecular aware patriotic princess.
IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUS 20d ago#7317068
spent 0 currency on pings
Birthright citizenship is one of the really great things about America. It means you can never (well, not since 1920, anyway) have a permanent underclass of nonvoting slaves like the UAE.
IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUSCHAD/STUD
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Israeli children.
JimieWhales 20d ago#7317125
spent 0 currency on pings
>one of the really great things about America
>means you can never have a permanent underclass of nonvoting slaves
Yeah it's not actually a good idea to try to get rid of it. You can end up creating the regressive issue of statelessness, which is widely considered a human rights violation, when you try to deport a child who is neither a citizen of the US, nor necessarily of whatever country you're sending them "back" to. I'm not a big fan of recreating problems we fixed a long time ago.
Everyone who hasn't served in the Military honorably for 4 years or a least one combat deployment should lose their citizenship and be given a green card. Any criminal loses their green card and is deported to whichever country volunteers to take them before we air-drop them into the middle of the Atlantic ocean
Voting conditional on an IQ test over 115 and owning property
as soon as the fed starts back up handing out the rest of that land out west again we can talk about policies designed to populate a vast (newly ) empty land 200 years ago
also the welfare state. those people back then got their free land and citizenship but there were no frozen tendies let alone neetbuxx
there aren't neetbux for anyone but refugees, EMS and School is covered by taxes they pay through sales and ad valorem from renting + the majority of the US is uninhabited, only citycels think it's overcrowded
maybe we just secure the border and don't change our fundamental laws
IVIayaelTheAnimaI/We
I’m 100% certain that at least half the mods do not have Faith or the Holy Spirit.
johannesalthusius 19d ago#7318666
spent 0 currency on pings
Compromise: birthright citizenship but only for first worlders
fr the only reason the US has birthright citizenship is bc when we made that decision it took months to get here and there was a fairly significant chance you'd die along the way, especially in the shittier passenger classes
nobody at the time could have foreseen that any prole would be able to fly from Europe to the US in less than a day for less than a single month's wages
I don't think it can ever be removed, though. You'd never get the majority you'd need to change it.
So we have to pay for their kids, way more expensive than the illegals just staying here, and there's a 110% they'll get into gangs and meth as soon as they're released.
Modern "j*urnalists" are basically LLMs trained on buzzwords that just string them together with an upward inflection to see how the interview subject reacts.
The entire point is to churn out as many statements as possible in response to as many buzzwords as possible to build an /r/politics headline.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
what a woman moment, she teed that one up for him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i literally don't even understand what sort of answer you could possibly give besides that one? like is the implication that you're not supposed to deport people who dragged their kids through 300 miles of desert?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, the issue is if illegal parents have US citizen kids
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Deport the parents, congratulations, the kid is now a ward of the state. Easy.
Don't like it? Ok, we can end birthright citizenship which is nonsense.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Birthright citizenship is one of the really great things about America. It means you can never (well, not since 1920, anyway) have a permanent underclass of nonvoting slaves like the UAE.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
come again?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah it's not actually a good idea to try to get rid of it. You can end up creating the regressive issue of statelessness, which is widely considered a human rights violation, when you try to deport a child who is neither a citizen of the US, nor necessarily of whatever country you're sending them "back" to. I'm not a big fan of recreating problems we fixed a long time ago.
https://www.state.gov/other-policy-issues/statelessness/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The child should get the parent's citizenship.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Some places they do, some they don't, but we don't have any control over that so it's kind of a pointless statement to make.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The vast majority of people live in countries without birthright citizenship.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Not our problem.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They do sometimes, but it doesn't nullify their US citizenship and it can't be revoked even if the policy changes
Everyone thank the based farmers for cooking up this spicy taco of a problem
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Just create tiers of citizenship
Anchor babies should get no entitlements, no voting rights, period
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No ex post facto laws so you're kinda fricked unless you burn the constitution
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It would be for things going forward. Current anchor babies obviously no one can do anything about
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Service guarantees citizenship. Frick entitlements without work. They have to go back. And you should lose your citizenship until you earn it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Everyone who hasn't served in the Military honorably for 4 years or a least one combat deployment should lose their citizenship and be given a green card. Any criminal loses their green card and is deported to whichever country volunteers to take them before we air-drop them into the middle of the Atlantic ocean
Voting conditional on an IQ test over 115 and owning property
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!americas kill this Old World-cel
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
darn that's very continental
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
its not 1820 anymore.
as soon as the fed starts back up handing out the rest of that land out west again we can talk about policies designed to populate a vast (newly ) empty land 200 years ago
also the welfare state. those people back then got their free land and citizenship but there were no frozen tendies let alone neetbuxx
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
there aren't neetbux for anyone but refugees, EMS and School is covered by taxes they pay through sales and ad valorem from renting + the majority of the US is uninhabited, only citycels think it's overcrowded
maybe we just secure the border and don't change our fundamental laws
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Compromise: birthright citizenship but only for first worlders
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So just Japanese or what?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
fr the only reason the US has birthright citizenship is bc when we made that decision it took months to get here and there was a fairly significant chance you'd die along the way, especially in the shittier passenger classes
nobody at the time could have foreseen that any prole would be able to fly from Europe to the US in less than a day for less than a single month's wages
I don't think it can ever be removed, though. You'd never get the majority you'd need to change it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nah it was passed after the war to grant citizenship to all former slaves and their children
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
So we have to pay for their kids, way more expensive than the illegals just staying here, and there's a 110% they'll get into gangs and meth as soon as they're released.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Sounds like the parent fricked up. There's a lot of kids that grow up without their parents because they are fricking idiots.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Specifically parents who came across the border illegally, then have an american born child because we are slow as frick at processing them.
soil based citizenship needs to go.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
dirt doesn't vote, chud
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Pictures that make you say fuk laws n shit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Modern "j*urnalists" are basically LLMs trained on buzzwords that just string them together with an upward inflection to see how the interview subject reacts.
The entire point is to churn out as many statements as possible in response to as many buzzwords as possible to build an /r/politics headline.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Landlord Messiahs?
Frick that's worse than I though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context