Regardless of who you supported most people would agree that Kamala did well in the debate. Can you remember a single thing she said?
They're eating the dogs. The people that came in. They're eating the cats. They're eating the pets of the people that live there.
Everyone remembers this line. It's like a five year old's spergout. It's like a doctor Seuss rhyme for r-slurs. But that's why its so good. You just can't fake this level of r-slurredness, and because you can't fake it, it's come off as genuine. Haitians bad. Whether you agree or not, you know what Trump is getting at and what he is trying to say.
Can you say the same about Kamala? Kamala is a midwit, but even a midwit knows how to hide her intentions. When she tells you that she is now for the border wall, do you believe her? A midwit is capable of saying that to your face because she thinks it'll court the centrist vote. It's simple 2D chess.
When Trump lies, he lies bigly. There aren't any subtilties whatsoever, the lies are often so dumb that you just have to sit back in awe of how dumb it is. So even though he lies it doesn't come off as capable of manipulation. The media in turn spergs out about all the dumb shit Trump says. It's good for the ratings, but also they are midwits themselves. But to the average American they don't feel the threat because they just tune out all the dumb nonsensical shit Trump says. So then people think that the media is being biased, which they are. Thats why its manipulative. It's 4D chess because its 1D chess.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I didn't remember that line. The haitian thing was conveniently forgotten including by me, when it turned to be a fabrication. Most voters just didn't have confidence in kamala or hate her spergy cackling or both. Also this isn't tiktok rslur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you watched the debate you for sure remembered it. Nothing else was interesting.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The funny thing is they're known for eating pets but also we have to pretend that asians weren't also doing that for like centuries? They just banned eating dogs in south korea in like 2023.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Asians understand the concept of property so it's not the same. I don't care if they eat their own dogs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Missing the point. Dems said this never happens but it's practically a running gag that asians eat dogs. It's like trying to claim that blacks don't like chicken.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My grandma made a joke about this. Look out for your cat if you live next to a Chinese restaurant. Instead of running off to post on reddit that she's a hardcore racist and I'm never speaking to my family again, I remembered that she actually treats Chinese people just the same as everyone else and this was just a joke. I wonder how many traumatized redditors' "racist grandpas" committed a sin like this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Dems are also focusing on the "other people's pets" part, although many seem to not be aware that's the crux of the issue
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
They are known to eat "pets", cause Haiti is extremely poor. If you can't find proper food anywhere you go and eat stray cats & dogs (also combats the stray cat & dog problem).
Give them the choice of a proper steak and a cat - they'll chose the steak.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's true actually. They were seen walking down the street with urban fowl and in their home country they eat cats. Ergo there is zero chance they have not eaten someone's cat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not logical.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It does require some ability to extrapolate with confidence
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context