NYT fact checks RFK Jr

Is it becouse they are mostly foids and want to nagg

!slots200

⬅️ foid saying something dumb

It's because the simple act of conveying the information is enough to muddy the waters or reorient the narrative. The vast majority of people do not care, so when down the line he is trying to remove the gay chemicals, some opposition can go "well he was fact checked by the grey lady of journ*lism" and that will be sufficient for a large number of people. Same as when reddit was getting a full blown disinfo campaign over project 2025 on it. Trump flatly stated it has nothing to do with him and he won't implement it, but redditards of course believe the sky is falling because dnc shills spammed it enough. There is too much noise in the modern world for the vast majority of people to be able to differentiate lies from truth

I maintain that most people involved in politics on a non-governmental level are in it just to see their enemies (both real and imaginary) suffer. Which is just one of the many reasons why the !grillers life is the righteous one. Just sit back with a plate of tendies and watch non-stop r-slur slapfights.

It's a slippery slope. Once you get rid of blue 52 and green 19 who is to say they won't ban vitamin enrichments?

Because the enemy team said it so its wrong even though its right.

When you rely on advertisers more than subscribers for money you're incentivized to cater to the former at the expensive of the later.

That's because anyone who is concerned about food additives only does so in bad faith

11% of Journos being "good journos" seems really high to be fair.

89% of journ*lists ejaculate during r*pe.