https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-big-return-office-131325537.html
They are both r-slurs who think they know how the economy works which we can tell is completely false when you realize that Elon really believes that sending people back to the offices is going to save money.
The only theory I found online that makes sense is that the purpose isn't to save money by having people come to the office, but instead saving money by having people quit because they do not want to come to the office.
It's a firing employees run.
Trump has gone full r-slur with his 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada plan. I have zero idea who this helps. I don't even expect the US capitalists to be making a profit if their product prices suddenly jumped by 25%.
The American economy is hitting that wall hard. China is 100% going to surpass the US economy at this rate. They already make better games than the US for cheaper. Chinese movies are also catching up to US movies in quality.
All Elon Musk understands is the profit motive. It is not going to be an issue for him if he gets 100 billion dollars richer and the US economy in exchange slows down by another percent.
Watch as we reach the moon and find out it is going to be another 30 years before moon mining becomes a profitable venture.
Elon Musk is 53 years old now. So we got another 40 years of him trying to define the direction of the world.
Say goodbye to workers rights.
Say hello to third world work hours and work conditions for everybody.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Were you not awake for when he fired most of Twitter to save costs? He knows exactly how RTO saves money.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's okay to take big risks like this with Twitter because the worst case scenario is that Twitter survives
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Twitter delenda est
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
software companies and the products they produce are generally overbloated in complication by a 3+ orders of magnitude, so firing even 80% still means it's highly over-bloated.
of course there is zero chance he actually understands this or how to get programmers to operate at efficiencies with 2-3 order of magnitude less code ... because it requires allowing engineers to continually experiments with highly meta paradigms, outside the scope of understanding of ur typical EM/PM management setup... and certainly can't be done on a modern software stack.
i'm not even sure he knows how to get it to really operate at 20% staff, twitter is mostly just operating off the leftover fumes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What great innovations came out of twitter in the last 10 years with all their staff and R&D investment?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
nothing innovative has been created in the last several decades. modern software is just complexity building on itself for the sake of it.
cause market ideology doesn't understand competition is incapable of weeding out all this unnecessary complexity.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context