Diversity Is Our Strength 
Top Poster of the Day:
peepeehands
Current Registered Users: 28,684
1. No metadrama except in arbitrary circumstances.
2. Don't post in bad faith!
3. Try to be thought provoking, not provoking.
/h/pol SETTINGS /h/pol LOG /h/pol MODS /h/pol EXILEES /h/pol FOLLOWERS /h/pol BLOCKERS
Current software version: bca0a1c
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What is a woman?
Leftoids: Well you see this is really quite complicated and to answer this question you need to listen to me ramble for the rest of the afternoon.
Rightoids: She has a kitty and not a peepee.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Are you familiar with Sal Alisky's Rules for Radicals? Have I told you about my "Dilemma of the Megaphone" analogy? Have you even read Antonio Gramsci or Foucault?"
https://www.conorfitzgerald.com/p/how-should-a-left-wing-politician
Yes, we're the party of the working class.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"What is a theta function?"
"For me, who I am going to relate to as a theta function, would be any function who I identify as deliberately trying to exist in math as a theta function."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Case closed I guess?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What if it's a feminine peepee?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Good old recursive reasoning, trying to define woman in terms of feeling like a woman
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Also defining it as a feeling rather than a fact. People 'feel' all sorts of things. Doesn't make them true except, apparently, in this instance.
Emotions are the last thing we should trust in terms of what is real, and yet they're exactly what's been used as the criteria for transgenderism. It's the problem all throughout prog logic, like 'feeling' unsafe or 'feeling' like a victim of bigotry. Doesn't matter if they're not true, doesn't matter how self-inflicted they are, doesn't matter how mentally ill the person already says they are. Their feelings demand others accommodate them, and if they don't whatever happens next is everyone's fault but their own.
Emotions lie. Maybe that's why shitlibs let them define reality for themselves.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's because the !ifrickinglovescience types are deeply religious. They've gotten rid of the theological aspects, but their manner of thinking is identical to pre-Enlightenment apologetics. Knowledge doesn't come from empiricism or even rationalism, it comes from revelation.
Unfortunately, Friedrich Nietzsche is too busy eternally recurring to rise from the grave and tell these losers he fricking called it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Oh but that's not a mistake, that is by design
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Of course it is. If it's just a feeling you can include all the heckin' valid
. You don't have to even have evidence, you can just say that's how you feel and boom, welcome to the club.
Gatekeeping is only good when they do it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wait wait, are you saying they're gatekeeping... gatekeeping?
That's kinda based when you put it that way. We too should do that more often
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is a good post.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
TL;DR: He says the question is a trap and then falls directly into it by following it up with a wordier version of 'a woman is a woman'
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Pakman somehow annoys me more than Destiny. And, my god, this is the last question on Earth that should be a 'gotcha'. Everyone has heard this question before by now, especially among the terminally online culture war grifters. And yet, 2 years after a fricking movie with that name came out, the best Pakman has is a circular definition, lol. "Well, uhh, a woman is like who, uh, I relate to as a, uh, woman because they identity as a woman".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Is he saying he's a woman??
Libtards smdh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He talks about himself wearing a wig, too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
His point is so childish I'm partially inclined to believe he's baiting.
Sorry? What? A) Has he seen the majority of mtfs? They have the voice of a man and are in a wig (and a dress). The only difference is they have a name like Krystal or something. So that is the differentiating factor?
And B) How does he gets to say what someone's gender is? Who died and made him the judge of gender? Either you leave it to an established, scientific, legal basis or you make it free for all where one day I get to be a man and kill someone, the next day I get to be a woman and go to a woman's prison and r*pe half the inmates.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I legitimately thought that's what he was going to say.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Out of 2 choices he managed to make a 3rd one that's even more r-slurred and manages to make both sides mad.
Truly a radical centrist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
1 minute and 20 seconds of nothing later
there saved you a watch
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
He gave a circular definition. This one is still making libshit's logic fold back over on itself four years later without even trying. "What is a woman?" A four year old could answer this. But it escapes the educated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
HEY
It's thanksgiving. A time for coming together. A time for family. A time to switch it up and ask "what is a daughter" As soon as someone mentions any familial relation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Funny you say that. I'm already interrogating my cousins pregnant wife about their unborn childs gender identity.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My friend in med school snapped a few years ago at a classmate who kept referring to fetuses as AMAB of AFAB
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
his definition
is transphobic. you don't have to try to pass as a woman 
to be one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm all for redefining the term woman of we can exclude fat people and include trains who pass extremely well.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Chuds are too homosexual for nuanced gender.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"In Mexico an air conditioner is called a politician because it makes a lot of noise but doesn't work very well."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context