Diversity Is Our Strength 
Top Poster of the Day:
peepeehands
Current Registered Users: 28,684
1. No metadrama except in arbitrary circumstances.
2. Don't post in bad faith!
3. Try to be thought provoking, not provoking.
/h/pol SETTINGS /h/pol LOG /h/pol MODS /h/pol EXILEES /h/pol FOLLOWERS /h/pol BLOCKERS
Current software version: 690f739
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good old recursive reasoning, trying to define woman in terms of feeling like a woman
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Also defining it as a feeling rather than a fact. People 'feel' all sorts of things. Doesn't make them true except, apparently, in this instance.
Emotions are the last thing we should trust in terms of what is real, and yet they're exactly what's been used as the criteria for transgenderism. It's the problem all throughout prog logic, like 'feeling' unsafe or 'feeling' like a victim of bigotry. Doesn't matter if they're not true, doesn't matter how self-inflicted they are, doesn't matter how mentally ill the person already says they are. Their feelings demand others accommodate them, and if they don't whatever happens next is everyone's fault but their own.
Emotions lie. Maybe that's why shitlibs let them define reality for themselves.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh but that's not a mistake, that is by design
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Of course it is. If it's just a feeling you can include all the heckin' valid
. You don't have to even have evidence, you can just say that's how you feel and boom, welcome to the club.
Gatekeeping is only good when they do it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wait wait, are you saying they're gatekeeping... gatekeeping?
That's kinda based when you put it that way. We too should do that more often
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's because the !ifrickinglovescience types are deeply religious. They've gotten rid of the theological aspects, but their manner of thinking is identical to pre-Enlightenment apologetics. Knowledge doesn't come from empiricism or even rationalism, it comes from revelation.
Unfortunately, Friedrich Nietzsche is too busy eternally recurring to rise from the grave and tell these losers he fricking called it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is a good post.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context